Recently, onaforums has taken to opening a substack. You can subscribe to this substack to get email notifications when the site is down, gets a new domain name, or is otherwise running into trouble. We are not accepting donations at this time, so please skip the part where it asks if you would like to contribute. Subscribe at onaforums.substack.com
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
I think I translated it.@Rodeo Clown i need a retard translation here. What do they think this is showing? The poster is saying they are happy that the swatter is caught so the forum can continuing called fat people fat without conflating that with the swaTTing. I can't even image what she thinks this proves?
View attachment 179296
Why bother? Blood from a stone etcWhen is Jackie going to apologize to that Nordic guy? He definitely needs to file a lawsuit...
New jackie's OSINT blogpost:
She does appear judgment proof since she allegedly has no assets and has hundreds of thousands of dollars in judgments against her. However, if any of her many faildoxes pursues a defamation lawsuit and prevails in court, she could land herself in jail the same way Fatso was almost jailed: contempt of court.Why bother? Blood from a stone etc
Giving them way too much credit. They’re focused here because here hurts their feelings.It's funny how they're both suspiciously not mentioning KiwiFarms, who they've also accused of being behind the swattings several times in the past. Maybe that's because "Null" is working on filing a defamation lawsuit against Epik for falsely accusing him and his site of committing crimes?
So does KiwiFarms. They both have huge, active threads there which are much easier to link to and have better explanations as to who these idiots are and why they are famous "lolcows". Linking to this place is a confusing jumble of sperg threads and inside jokes *from da show* which confuses normies.Giving them way too much credit. They’re focused here because here hurts their feelings.
True, but hot damn is it a classic case of defamation. She wrote articles on her blog and twitted/used his real name. He's one Google search away from never being hired again.Why bother? Blood from a stone etc
What she thinks and it's funny is that somehow because the guy swatting him got caught we should all be in panic even though we didn't swat him, my guess is it is to suggest to her followers we swatted him. She wants that illusion alive to her people, otherwise what Coonskin said is 100% accurate, Pat is the victim of felony locker room style ball=breaking which isn't illegal,@Rodeo Clown i need a retard translation here. What do they think this is showing? The poster is saying they are happy that the swatter is caught so the forum can continuing called fat people fat without conflating that with the swaTTing. I can't even image what she thinks this proves?
View attachment 179296
Rude and rude!This is NOT a soundboard!
She couldn’t be imprisoned for being unable to pay. Pat was at risk of being held in contempt of court for flaunting the debtor’s exam and the procedural shit he was poo pooing.She does appear judgment proof since she allegedly has no assets and has hundreds of thousands of dollars in judgments against her. However, if any of her many faildoxes pursues a defamation lawsuit and prevails in court, she could land herself in jail the same way Fatso was almost jailed: contempt of court.
Mrs b fully exposed you say..New jackie's OSINT blogpost:
Cyberterrorist Mrs Badger full identity EXPOSED: Flavia Peace Mullen
Something doesn't seem right. If the fbi really was sitting on this for a while, the most logical thing is that the they are using the 17 year old to get to the others who probably were more careful about their anonymity. Isn't that how they usually do shit when there's a group. Start at the bottom and start working up to get confessions and evidence?The idea that a bunch of Northeast jamokes in their 30s and 40s were paying a 17 year old in Florida $20 bucks a pop to swat a fat rube from Wisconsin for two years is honestly the most hilarious thing I've ever heard come out of this community. It's so fucking ridiculous I can't even wrap my mind around it.
That's what I was saying. If her faildox prevails in court, she refuses to pay her judgment, and the faildoxed pursues the same collection efforts "Quasi" did, she will find herself in the same position as Fatso, in contempt of court and facing jail (not prison) time. Prison time would be if the IRS finally decides to throw her in there for her alleged debts to them.She couldn’t be imprisoned for being unable to pay. Pat was at risk of being held in contempt of court for flaunting the debtor’s exam and the procedural shit he was poo pooing.
If he did the debtor’s exam and didn’t have his last minute benefactor, he likely would’ve been ordered to loan against his equity in the hovel or sell it and maybe sell his bike, then get a job at a gas station and pay Quasi like $11 a month or some other nominal figure in perpetuity. You don’t go to jail for owing someone money you go to jail for putting the judge on your pay no mind list. Jackie is truly possessionless so if she’s sued and complies with the debtors exam, she’ll just be ordered to do a job search.
Yeahhhhh but really she’d just fulfill whatever bullshit job search requirements the court lays out (easier than unemployment reqs I’m sure) and because any prospective employer would google her and see what a unhireable mess she is she could go on doing this forever and be fine. I’m sure she’s way too big of a coward and not as dumb as Pat in such a way as to actually challenge any judge convening over her.That's what I was saying. If her faildox prevails in court, she refuses to pay her judgment, and the faildoxed pursues the same collection efforts "Quasi" did, she will find herself in the same position as Fatso, in contempt of court and facing jail (not prison) time. Prison time would be if the IRS finally decides to throw her in there for her alleged debts to them.
This forum is dedicated exclusively to parody, comedy, and satirical content. None of the statements, opinions, or depictions shared on this platform should be considered or treated as factual information under any circumstances. All content is intended for entertainment purposes only and should be regarded as fictional, exaggerated, or purely the result of personal opinions and creative expression.
Please be aware that this forum may feature discussions and content related to taboo, controversial, or potentially offensive subjects. The purpose of this content is not to incite harm but to engage in satire and explore the boundaries of humor. If you are sensitive to such subjects or are easily offended, we kindly advise that you leave the forum.
Any similarities to real people, events, or situations are either coincidental or based on real-life inspirations but used within the context of fair use satire. By accepting this disclaimer, you acknowledge and understand that the content found within this forum is strictly meant for parody, satire, and entertainment. You agree not to hold the forum, its administrators, moderators, or users responsible for any content that may be perceived as offensive or inappropriate. You enter and participate in this forum at your own risk, with full awareness that everything on this platform is purely comedic, satirical, or opinion-based, and should never be taken as factual information.
If any information or discussion on this platform triggers distressing emotions or thoughts, please leave immediately and consider seeking assistance.
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (USA): Phone: 1-800-273-TALK (1-800-273-8255) Website: https://suicidepreventionlifeline.org/