Patrick hinting at a lawsuit with leslie.

[Racist Google Intern]

I hope not for Leslie's sake but I also want it to happen so he can lose again

 

[Faggot Boqposter]

“no one seems to care about her”

Rick you sell like 100 books per year and have to pay to speak in front of an audience of 7 people.

 

[kingship75]

Sounds like something someone in complete control would say

 

[guest]

Does someone need to remind him that hes still paying off Quasi?

 

[Uncle Anthony Cumia]

I hope not for Leslie's sake but I also want it to happen so he can lose again
View attachment 187085

Knowing Piggy’s history in court, Leslie should feel no fear. Besides he’s been ghosted by SFWA, he doesent have the money to sue her.

 

[guest]

Unless Bernell was carrying 100 grand in cash on him when he was murdered, the only place Pat will be suing Leslie is in his dreams.

The only way he was able to get lawyers to sue the MPD is because they're hoping to get a settlement from the city; I'm guessing that lawyer's office is slow so they're taking at a swing at it pro bono with an arrangement to keep the majority of the winnings if they're victorious.

 

[quasi101]

He's a public figure. Defamation is almost impossible to prove under the best circumstances in the united states against a public figure. It usually entails actual malice. Actual malice for example would be they knew the statement was false or acted without doing any research into the falsity.

Since this standard regards the Defendants state of mind its a ridiculous burden. Which is why most defamation lawsuits don't proceed unless its like foxes retarded email against those voting machine companies. The execs literally had emails like "we know this evidence isn't true but we're airing the segment anyway".

Unless he can show she didn't do any research (she did), Or she knew it was false it doesn't go anywhere.

You'd think someone who spent over 200k on a defamation lawsuit would know the very basics.

 

[Cuphead]

With what money?

 

[quasi101]

With what money?

Someone else's

 

[NoBacon]

He's a public figure. Defamation is almost impossible to prove under the best circumstances in the united states against a public figure. It usually entails actual malice. Actual malice for example would be they knew the statement was false or acted without doing any research into the falsity.

Since this standard regards the Defendants state of mind its a ridiculous burden. Which is why most defamation lawsuits don't proceed unless its like foxes retarded email against those voting machine companies. The execs literally had emails like "we know this evidence isn't true but we're airing the segment anyway".

Unless he can show she didn't do any research (she did), Or she knew it was false it doesn't go anywhere.

You'd think someone who spent over 200k on a defamation lawsuit would know the very basics.

Brother Joe had his “day in court” all by HIMSELF and WON. It’s just “lazy” and entitled MILLENNIAL libtards like Patrick who can’t “DEFEAT” the crooked demonRAT “system” like he did. Then Brother Joe revelled in the “SPOILS OF WAR” by posting that disgusting old liberal judges TITS all over HIS social media!

 

[Hudson]

Litigious Patso is on a (hoagie) roll.

I thought she sold her half of her business?

 

[quasi101]

Brother Joe had his “day in court” all by HIMSELF and WON. It’s just “lazy” and entitled MILLENNIAL libtards like Patrick who can’t “DEFEAT” the crooked demonRAT “system” like he did. Then Brother Joe revelled in the “SPOILS OF WAR” by posting that disgusting old liberal judges TITS all over HIS social media!

THE DEFENDANT, JOSEPH CUMIA

 

[Racist Google Intern]

Litigious Patso is on a (hoagie) roll.

I thought she sold her half of her business?

Wetbrains don't remember stuff.

 

[BakersfieldChimp]

Brother Joe had his “day in court” all by HIMSELF and WON

AND he got the girl!

 

[Uncle Anthony Cumia]

THE DEFENDANT, JOSEPH CUMIA

Little did the judge know that water bottle was in fact full of child spit.

 

[LeapYearRavioliCap]

Isn't this the same fat cocksucker who accused a publisher or artist of plagiarism because they had a black bird on a red cover like another book did?

Sorry, I meant stupid fat cocksucker

 

[Lard Glug]

He's a public figure. Defamation is almost impossible to prove under the best circumstances in the united states against a public figure. It usually entails actual malice. Actual malice for example would be they knew the statement was false or acted without doing any research into the falsity.

Since this standard regards the Defendants state of mind its a ridiculous burden. Which is why most defamation lawsuits don't proceed unless its like foxes retarded email against those voting machine companies. The execs literally had emails like "we know this evidence isn't true but we're airing the segment anyway".

Unless he can show she didn't do any research (she did), Or she knew it was false it doesn't go anywhere.

You'd think someone who spent over 200k on a defamation lawsuit would know the very basics.

And how is going to prove damages? With his book sales numbers? “I only sold 16 books this year, jury childs. Before her Tweet I sold 19. Clearly she should be jailed along with the cybercriminal terrorists enacting plans to murder my family, as is their stated goal.”

 

[NoBacon]

THE DEFENDANT, JOSEPH CUMIA

BROTHER JOE MARCHED IN THERE AND GOT PAID IN FULL THE SAME DAY ALL ON HIS OWN UNLIKE REDDITARD QUASI AND HIS 10 YEAR ODYSSEY TO GET MADE WHOLE.

 

[NoBacon]

Does this fat idiot really think anybody else believes he’s got the resources to start another unwinnable lolsuit again alongside his current one and former one?

It probably would lead to even more mandatory sanctions, he’s got more sanctions to navigate than North Korea.

 

[TheGhostOfAbeVigoda]

Keep digging that hole, Pat.