Pat will get a slap on the wrist

[gassers]

I hope I am wrong, but I am guessing the contempt hearing could turn out be very underwhelming.

I think the funsters and redditors are too excited including myself, hope it doesn't disappoint us.

 

[StealthyFag]

The judge doesn't seem like he suffers fools gladly. Patrick has already defaulted and indicated publicly multiple times that he will not pay what he owes.

I was depressed after the Josiah Tapes dropped becuase I thought that was the peak, that the best was over. Now I think the best is yet to come.

 

[Slackjawed Cow]

Pat does have a way of turning into a meek sack of shit when he is possibly facing a punishment. He plays stupid and I wouldnt put it past him to turn on the water works. It would be unfortunate if he can bullshit his way out of this one. From hearing how this judge handles things like debts and the fact pat stiffed his own legal help should hopefully be enough that the judge doesnt show pity.

 

[AliceWorquer]

What would a slap on the wrist even be in a contempt hearing? Surely the absolute best Patrick can hope for is "you have this long to make a real attempt to play ball or I will have you arrested". Its not like he'll say "just don't do it again" and Patrick can skate on all issues.

 

[Slackjawed Cow]

What would a slap on the wrist even be in a contempt hearing? Surely the absolute best Patrick can hope for is "you have this long to make a real attempt to play ball or I will have you arrested". Its not like he'll say "just don't do it again" and Patrick can skate on all issues.

I dont know if its even possible but Id say somehow talking his way into another delay for a couple months.

 

[Udders]

Besides a possible jail stint, it's also gonna be fun when they start by seizing assets like his silly motorcycle and sell it. If he refuses to meet the debt, the debt will come to meet him. It's not like he can just refuse and ignore forever.

 

[Guest]

This is why you aren’t getting laid, Killjoy

 

[Butterknife]

I dont know if its even possible but Id say somehow talking his way into another delay for a couple months.

I don't see it. He screwed himself by signing the amortization plan and not following it. That was his free delay of a few months. If he isn't ready to start paying on 8/24, he's getting fined at the very least.

 

[Blurry Niki Enthusiast]

I have no reason to suspect otherwise but I hope Pawlowski is ready to deal with whatever bullshit Rick throws his way in court. Whether it’s relitigating the original case, asking to defer the trial because of funsters in the courtroom, self-swatting the night before, allegedly easily manipulated exhibits, no legal strategy is too stupid for this boring, white cis male.

 

[gassers]

asking to defer the trial because of funsters in the courtroom, + allegedly easily manipulated exhibits

I am expecting something along these lines. he has a habit of falsifying evidence, wouldn't surprise me if he does it this time as well.

 

[Cygnus Nana X-1]

This is a real judgement. It won't just disappear. He will be given some sort of requirement but he's not going to go to prison as he loves to tell everyone else. Well, unless he becomes belligerent or violently spurges out and gets dragged away.

 

[SFWA liaison]

"Pat will get a slap on the wrist"

Smelly Jackie: "THEY'RE THREATENING PATRICK WITH BATTERY!!!"

 

[chocolatehellhole]

the retards here seem to not understand what a court judgment is. They think its like credit card debt or something. This isn't debt collectors calling your house where you just ignore them. People keep saying dumb shit like "if the judge rules he has to pay" or something.

The reason it takes a long time is the process is slow, and they give people a lot of leeway...until they don't. You just don't know how much leeway that is. Just look at the options he has over the entire lifetime of the debt instead of each indivdual action, that's what 1.2 brains does. Skip the debtor's exam, then I don't have to deal with it today. Sign the amortization, which puts a stay on the collections for 3 months.

I doubt any retard here has ever been involved in any civil litigation whatsoever... it can take months to even get the most basic hearings scheduled... mediator sessions... It's a real schlep!

 

[guest]

I hope I am wrong, but I am guessing the contempt hearing could turn out be very underwhelming.

I think the funsters and redditors are too excited including myself, hope it doesn't disappoint us.

Having his atalkers show up can work in Fatrick's favor, forget deferring the trial, he can argue it is "Intimidation of a victim'

940.45  Intimidation of victims; felony. Whoever violates s. [URL='https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/statutes/940.44']940.44[/URL] under any of the following circumstances is guilty of a Class G felony:
(1) Where the act is accompanied by force or violence or attempted force or violence upon the victim, or the spouse, child, stepchild, foster child, parent, sibling, or grandchild of the victim, or any person sharing a common domicile with the victim.
(2) Where the act is accompanied by injury or damage to the real or personal property of any person covered under sub. [URL='https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/statutes/940.45(1)'](1)[/URL].
[URL='https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/statutes/940.45(3)']940.45(3)[/URL](3) Where the act is accompanied by any express or implied threat of force, violence, injury or damage described in sub. [URL='https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/statutes/940.45(1)'](1)[/URL] or [URL='https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/statutes/940.45(2)'](2)[/URL].
(4) Where the act is in furtherance of any conspiracy.
(5) Where the act is committed by any person who has suffered any prior conviction for any violation under s. [URL='https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/statutes/1979/943.30']943.30[/URL], 1979 stats., ss. [URL='https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/statutes/940.42']940.42[/URL] to [URL='https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/statutes/940.45']940.45[/URL], or any federal statute or statute of any other state which, if the act prosecuted was committed in this state, would be a violation under ss. [URL='https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/statutes/940.42']940.42[/URL] to [URL='https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/statutes/940.45']940.45[/URL].
(6) Where the act is committed by any person for monetary gain or for any other consideration acting on the request of any other person. All parties to the transactions are guilty under this section.
(7) Where the underlying crime is an act of domestic abuse, as defined in s. [URL='https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/statutes/968.075(1)(a)']968.075 (1) (a)[/URL], that constitutes the commission of a crime or a crime that, following a conviction, is subject to the surcharge in s. [URL='https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/statutes/973.055']973.055[/URL].
History: [URL='https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/acts/1981/118']1981 c. 118[/URL]; [URL='https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/acts/1997/143']1997 a. 143[/URL]; [URL='https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/acts/2001/109']2001 a. 109[/URL]; [URL='https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/acts/2007/96']2007 a. 96[/URL]; [URL='https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/acts/2009/28']2009 a. 28[/URL]; [URL='https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/acts/2019/112']2019 a. 112[/URL].

[URL unfurl="true"]https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/940/ii/43/7[/URL]

 

[Meownaw]

Yes, child they will slap his wrist in cuffs.

 

[chocolatehellhole]

Having his atalkers show up can work in Fatrick's favor, forget deferring the trial, he can argue it is "Intimidation of a victim'

https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/940/ii/43/7

Nice legal take, idiot. How would it be "furtherance of conspiracy", as you highlighted, for Dan to sit in the courtroom?

 

[Butterknife]

Having his atalkers show up can work in Fatrick's favor, forget deferring the trial, he can argue it is "Intimidation of a victim'

https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/940/ii/43/7

There's no trial, dumbass. He already lost.

 

[gassers]

Having his atalkers show up can work in Fatrick's favor, forget deferring the trial, he can argue it is "Intimidation of a victim'

https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/940/ii/43/7

That is quite a reach, let's say as a hypothetical the judge agrees with the above.

Sosnay will just schedule a private hearing. Probably just with court transcripts and audio recordings.