• Recently, onaforums has taken to opening a substack. You can subscribe to this substack to get email notifications when the site is down, gets a new domain name, or is otherwise running into trouble. We are not accepting donations at this time, so please skip the part where it asks if you would like to contribute. Subscribe at onaforums.substack.com

  • Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators. If you want your account deleted, send a private message to @BlackTransLivesMatter

    Do not post IRL pranks here without including the source

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

Pat has the sentencing hearing all planned out.

Salted Earth Truffle

Eric Hildeman poked my no-no hole when I was 5
Forum Clout
41,085
Plus I don’t think they have victim impact statements for misdemeanor phone harassment cases.
There hasn’t been any harassment, just Pat engaging in conversation with Reddit users. Pat is still pretending he thinks the SWATs came from here, all based on his own hunches and despite all evidence to the contrary. The onus is on him to prove it, because the authorities would have bothered trying if they had any persuasive evidence. But they don’t and he knows it. That’s one of the reasons he’s gone even further off the rails lately.
 

Bin_The_Blacks

What you Torquin 'bout Wheelers
Forum Clout
22,777
StealthyGook is my favorite.
stealthygook.jpg
 

BudDickman

Forum Clout
43,086
I had to look this up, and it's actually called a "victim impact statement", not a "witness impact statement". Pat isn't a witness, because he insists that there actually won't be a trial. Only a trial has witnesses.

Every time that it's been brought to his attention that if there is a trial, he would be cross examined by opposing counsel and inconsistencies in his testimony would be found and would lead to the exoneration of whoever it is that will be spending "many many years in prison", he responds that there won't be a trial because they'll just accept the plea deal offered to them.

A more effective rebuttal would be "there are no inconsistencies in my statements and the evidence against you is irrefutable", but Pat is so stupid that he is constantly being tricked into tacitly (or "tactically" in Patspeak) acknowledging that he is full of his shit and that he would be exposed as a liar in front of a jury.
 
Top