• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

No Official Audio Recording on 8/24

Slackjawed Cow

I laugh at them because they're all the same.
Forum Clout
262,694
If there are specific rules stating no cell phones, no cameras, no audio recordings, don't do it. It's illegal. Don't give fatso any reason to squeal, "SEE, OINK, THEY'RE CRIMINALS!! I TOLD YOUUUU!! OINK, FART, OINK"
The only legal recording would be quasis if he arranges that to happen but at least it would be recorded. We can only hope at some point it becomes public. Not sure the legality of him sharing it publicly.
 

Slackjawed Cow

I laugh at them because they're all the same.
Forum Clout
262,694
I hope everybody gives him some space on the day of. He needs lots of time to prepare and get his head together. Childing stalkers all morning won't help him at all.
Whatever you do, dont fuel his oppositional disorder by telling him to cooperate with the court and bring the income documents or a check for $50k required to speed up the process of paying quasi.
 
Forum Clout
42,292
The only legal recording would be quasis if he arranges that to happen but at least it would be recorded. We can only hope at some point it becomes public. Not sure the legality of him sharing it publicly.
If Quasi's attorney is permitted to record the proceedings but is not granted permission to share it publicly, Quasi could have one of the autists do an animated reinactment using the official court transcripts, but with the appropriate inflections, pauses, stutters, screams, etc. as heard in the audio recording without using the actual recording.
 
Forum Clout
4,110
If Quasi's attorney is permitted to record the proceedings but is not granted permission to share it publicly, Quasi could have one of the autists do an animated reinactment using the official court transcripts, but with the appropriate inflections, pauses, stutters, screams, etc. as heard in the audio recording without using the actual recording.
It's a serviceable Plan B and much more legal, but let's not kid ourselves and pretend a re-enactment will come close to the real thing. Just compare the Nadolski transcript to the actual audio. You totally miss a lot of amusing interruptions and don't get a sense of the pace of conversation in the transcript. The transcript dropped first and it was amusing, but none of us could have predicted the judge's bemused affect and how fucking funny the moment where Pat directly addressed Nadolski was.
 

Uncle J’s Sink Emporium

Enjoy prison, Y’munkoke
Forum Clout
32,269
The other side (Quasi's defense team) would obviously want the transcript for their own defense. So there should be something tangible from that day, that we can take a look at.

But if want a fucking REAL recording, then one of us local Brothermen are going to have to man up, roll to the hearing with an iPhone that's got Voice Memo's fired up and ready to go, and get us a recording of the proceedings as inconspicuously as they can, while avoiding all eye contact with Patrick and Niki.
Don’t be a faggot and ruin things for us here. But if you are going to be a faggot anyways..

 
Forum Clout
42,292
If he doesn’t show up, will the proposals be adopted by default, including the penalties and everything?

Not turning up is the most stupid possible move so he almost certainly will do it and no show
Judges usually have their minds made up prior to these types of contempt hearings. They read through everything given to them by the Plaintiffs and Defendants and have enough with that alone to decide how to rule. It's up to fatso to convincingly plead his case as to why he's brazenly ignored court orders and beg for mercy, and give the judge a reason not to hold him in contempt. If fatso tries to re-try the original case, argues with and interrupts the judge, throws a tantrum, doesn't shut up when told, he's screwed, and he's held in contempt. If he doesn't show up, he's also screwed, and it's a bench warrant.

Judges are always unpredictable, though, so there are no guarantees either way.
 

Prison Enjoyer

Status: Enjoying Prison! 😁
Forum Clout
35,759
@Dan, send the clerk Rick's tweets saying Sosnay has no power over him, can't make him pay, and can't touch him. It's a long-shot but could perhaps sway some opinions if they see his insults towards the court's authority & the judge.

Just have the AI thing Porsalin used act out the transcripts in Rick's voice. Bobo's voice for the judge, Intern David's for quasi's lawyer.

There's clips of the judge talking on YouTube whipping the piss out of a chinese woman debtor in court after she too skipped a hearing. As for Pawlowski, I vote for Josiah's voice; more fitting as he's there as Quasi's representative.
 

PorqueDealer

Portly Pepperoni Purveyor
Forum Clout
35,932
1692315133400.png
 

Toothless Enthusiast

Killed by Patrick!
Forum Clout
33,707
Judges usually have their minds made up prior to these types of contempt hearings. They read through everything given to them by the Plaintiffs and Defendants and have enough with that alone to decide how to rule. It's up to fatso to convincingly plead his case as to why he's brazenly ignored court orders and beg for mercy, and give the judge a reason not to hold him in contempt. If fatso tries to re-try the original case, argues with and interrupts the judge, throws a tantrum, doesn't shut up when told, he's screwed, and he's held in contempt. If he doesn't show up, he's also screwed, and it's a bench warrant.

Judges are always unpredictable, though, so there are no guarantees either way.
I can understand where Sosnay is coming from to be fair to him. One party is anonymous and the other party is allegedly being stalked and self-swatting, it makes sense based on the court filings alone.
 
Forum Clout
42,292
I can understand where Sosnay is coming from to be fair to him. One party is anonymous and the other party is allegedly being stalked and self-swatting, it makes sense based on the court filings alone.
The audio/video recordings? It often comes down to budgetary reasons for not making recordings available for the public in these lower level court proceedings. The cameras and audio in these smaller courts are there for security purposes and evidentiary/appellate records. Most courtrooms have rules for no cell phones or cameras because they're constant distractions and interruptions, and to protect the privacy of innocent parties.
 
Last edited:
Top