• This forum is dedicated exclusively to parody, comedy, and satirical content. None of the statements, opinions, or depictions shared on this platform should be considered or treated as factual information under any circumstances. All content is intended for entertainment purposes only and should be regarded as fictional, exaggerated, or purely the result of personal opinions and creative expression.

    Please be aware that this forum may feature discussions and content related to taboo, controversial, or potentially offensive subjects. The purpose of this content is not to incite harm but to engage in satire and explore the boundaries of humor. If you are sensitive to such subjects or are easily offended, we kindly advise that you leave the forum.

    Any similarities to real people, events, or situations are either coincidental or based on real-life inspirations but used within the context of fair use satire. By accepting this disclaimer, you acknowledge and understand that the content found within this forum is strictly meant for parody, satire, and entertainment. You agree not to hold the forum, its administrators, moderators, or users responsible for any content that may be perceived as offensive or inappropriate. You enter and participate in this forum at your own risk, with full awareness that everything on this platform is purely comedic, satirical, or opinion-based, and should never be taken as factual information.

    If any information or discussion on this platform triggers distressing emotions or thoughts, please leave immediately and consider seeking assistance.

    National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (USA): Phone: 1-800-273-TALK (1-800-273-8255) Website: https://suicidepreventionlifeline.org/

  • On 01-26-2021, Patrick S Tomlinson submitted a lawsuit, case number 2021CV000500 in Wisconsin. The address listed on the court website is 2316 North Oakland Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53211 US

    This lawsuit claimed multiple torts. One of which was that a book review quoted as "John Doe 11 posting as 'barfyman362': "Not good...Just not good."

    As stated on page 3 of the complaint. This was brought by Minc Law "NOW COMES the Plaintiff Patrick S. Tomlinson ("Plaintiff") by his atorneys, Axley Brynelson, LLP and Minc Law," Specifically Brinton J Resto.

    The Complaint authored by Brinton J Resto's stated verbatim, "Upon information and belief, Defendants John Does 1-60 ("Defendants") are individuals who anonymously authored and published false and defamatory statements regarding Plaintiff"

    As per Minc Law's website

    • https://www.minclaw.com/wisconsin-defamation-law-state-guide/

    • Opinion refers to statements and communications which are unable to be independently verified as fact or fiction, and relied on by defamation defendants in the United States and Wisconsin.

    • After a performer emailed her customer to complain about her performance being posted and shared online, the customer distributed the performer’s email among its community, along with a notation characterizing it as “overzealous,” “litigious” and “heavy-handed.” The court held that such characterizations merely expressed the author’s opinion about the email and was thus not defamatory.

    • This page has been peer-reviewed, fact-checked, and edited by multiple qualified attorneys and legal professionals to ensure substantive accuracy and coverage. Our publication process is robust, following a 16-step content creation and review process.

    Mr Resto, who does in fact hold a law degree (I’m as shocked as you, but I doubled checked). Decided that statement Not good...Just not good was in fact defamatory per Wisconsin law.

    Yes that’s the very same Brinton J. Resto who joined The Calkins Law Firm in July of 2022.

    By dismissing this notice you accept these factual statements.

More bad friends stock.



Once again his "allies" are now calling the arrest a photoshop because they love pedophiles.

Screen Shot 2023-03-18 at 3.44.15 PM.png


This really shows how retarded Pat is. He could've just denied that the document was real, or just not acknowledged at all. Some people here were even suspecting that Dan photoshopped it until Pat confirmed it's authenticity.
I got Pat to say that by suggesting Rona cold only have lied because he committed worse crimes. Pig wrangling him into his own admissions is so easy.


Sperg weaboo pariah wasn't happy when you said you were productive and spent quality time with your family
The best part of all these things (as my wife just said "you realize it's quarter after four") is I know I waste too much time, but this is literally the best thing to make me laugh available in the world. It's my entertainment and nothing these idiots say that think is biting can ever make me feel anything but good. The worse the shit they say the funnier it is. I'm away with my wife and kids, he's drawing Pokemon, but I'm a loser for mocking Pat, sure.


I got Pat to say that by suggesting Rona cold only have lied because he committed worse crimes. Pig wrangling him into his own admissions is so easy.

Did we ever get to the bottom of his logic on this?

Clearly he means he was only guilty of threatening to hurt John. Which means either A) His sister in law made up the rest for reasons or B) She made a mistake and was wrong

The truth, obviously, is she didn’t lie about anything and it was her word against his and he decided to admit to threatening John so they charged him with that.