Great doc. Thanks for that. What's the name?
-
- Mr. Tomlinson's feud started after members of the now-defunct Reddit site r/opieandanthony got his Twitter account suspended, causing him to threaten some bored trolls who never heard of him with a libel lawsuit. The trolls responded predictably.
- Mr. Tomlinson has been instructed many times by friends, family, police, and attorneys to stop engaging with his trolls, and that continuing to provoke them will cause him to be trolled even more. Mr. Tomlinson wilfully ignores this advice
- He would eventually file a defamation suit against 60 anonymous people which was dismissed with Mr. Tomlinson being ordered to pay $34,762.25 for opposing parties' attorney fees.
- He ended up paying $83,736.99 due to his unsuccessful attempts to dodge the court-ordered judgement, for which he faced jail time and contempt charges.
- He also filed 2 frivolous restraining orders against people who had engaged in First Amendment-protected behavior (one for texting him and another for attending his contempt of court hearing), both of which were dismissed.
- Early on in the lawsuit, Mr. Tomlinson vandalized his own motorcycle and submitted a false police report blaming the people he was suing.
- He accidentally sent surveillance video of the alleged vandal (himself) to a troll.
- Mr. Tomlinson has never shown this video footage during any of his media tours, and desperately tries to scrub it from the internet.
- Mr. Tomlinson claims that the surveillance video was initiated by his "motion-activated" camera, which only collects "30 seconds at a time", despite the video being 32 seconds long and beginning several seconds before the "vandal" enters into the frame.
- On 13 April 2023, the individual responsible for calling the fake emergencies (SWATs) to Mr. Tomlinson's house, a SWAT-for-hire dealer named "Torswats", revealed that Mr. Tomlinson ordered the SWATs to his own house because he wanted to get in the news and sue the MPD for money.
- Torswats would repeat these allegations in private chats which were not intended for public view.
- Mr. Tomlinson has gone on multiple news tours since the SWATtings started in order to promote his victimhood brand, utilizing the services of Lenora Claire.
- He also recently sued the MPD for money.
-
Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
[email protected]
Legit Question: 9/11
- Thread starter medium wyzzz
- Start date
Great doc. Thanks for that. What's the name?
I don't know the answers to any of your questions, but I'll try to bullshit my way.
You want to demolish a building and you know a plane is going to hit the high levels, so you wire up the low levels. Eventually fires may spread and start a detonation naturally (that is, without someone pushing a button on a remote).
By the time the buildings collapsed many people had already fled, and would they attribute it to explosives even if so? I was once in NYC for July 4 and it's amazing how much louder the buildings make the fireworks. I think people who lived there didn't question the extra noise.
There are just other facts -- and yeah coincidences can happen, but one of the ones I really like is that the head of security at WTC, 9/11 was his first day, which is just weird. He died. Who starts on a Tuesday?
You want to demolish a building and you know a plane is going to hit the high levels, so you wire up the low levels. Eventually fires may spread and start a detonation naturally (that is, without someone pushing a button on a remote).
By the time the buildings collapsed many people had already fled, and would they attribute it to explosives even if so? I was once in NYC for July 4 and it's amazing how much louder the buildings make the fireworks. I think people who lived there didn't question the extra noise.
If they were, would we know? I mean, it's amazing that they found a completely unburned, intact passport of one of the hijackers.
Maybe but there is more than one way to do a job.
There are just other facts -- and yeah coincidences can happen, but one of the ones I really like is that the head of security at WTC, 9/11 was his first day, which is just weird. He died. Who starts on a Tuesday?
nice stupid questions, stupid
I’ll preface this with: Israel 100% was behind 9/11. He probably meant “pull it” as in “pull out the fire department, it’s not worth it.”. The people presenting this information do a bad job at pointing the viewer to the direct problem. To use your earlier posts as an example, those news anchors weren’t in on anything. They’re regurgitating information that was given to them. A lot of “sources” are government officials. The way the videos are portrayed, it comes across as saying the anchors were somehow in on it. That’s obviously not the intent, but to a passerby that’s the result. They were probably getting reports from AP, who were probably getting information from “trusted sources”.And this:
Spacecowboy 777 🇺🇸 on Gab: 'Larry Silverstein of Silverstein Properties, owne…'
Spacecowboy 777 🇺🇸 on Gab: 'Larry Silverstein of Silverstein Properties, owner of the World Trade Center, infamously admits that Building 7 was a controlled demolition. Building 7 was not hit by a plane, yet collapsed on 9/11 at free fall speed in the afternoon. The media covered it up and...gab.com
It's a one-minute clip and I'm wondering what the context could be about "pull it"....
Go listen to stupid Troy Quan justify 9/11 "skepticism"; the answer for literally everything is "I don't know" and "I have questions". They never have to actually back the shit they say, they just know that you are full of shit.
If there were planes and not shitty CGI - it was done on non-electric millisecond delays and det cord would work for the initiation system.
No electrical interference possible with nonel.
Or a single-point remote detonator as your charges are daisy-chained, at least dual-path and in this case more redundancy.
Structure demolition charges are small, like <10# each. Watch videos of commercial demolitions, not overly loud.
Thin aluminum shell with plastic shock tube or thin wires. Destroyed in fire.
No.
My question is directed at the instability and flammability of explosives. Most demolition sites are sensitive to electricity of any kind, including static charges. If a building is loaded with explosives and is hit by a plane, how wouldn't that ignite the explosives? If a building is loaded with explosives and functions as a normal office building weeks and days before the demolition, doesn't all that activity run the risk of igniting the explosives?
Those fireworks are further away than where people fled to. Taking down the WTC would require much more explosives near population centers. It would be a lot louder and less isolated than what you're describing.
I know this is an odd thing to have happened, but it's more plausible than the liabilities that would go with planting it and the minimal gains anyone stands to make from planting it. The case against Mohammed Atta isn't made or broken on his passport being discovered at the scene. There were tens of thousands of witnesses to the first plane, plus airport surveillance and his travel itinerary to say nothing of his activities leading up to that point.
Finding pieces like that sounds absurd, but remember that parts of the plane scattered onto the streets too. It was deliberately flown into the tower, so breaking apart at high speeds makes sense.
My concern about the thermite is there just isn't a track record of it being used in demolitions and the genesis of thermite as part of any counter-narrative is based on Steven Jones claiming to have found thermite at Ground Zero. Since then, you just see a lot of people starting with ways thermite was used and working their way backwards.
"That dude managing front desk gatekeepers? Make sure he gets it, too."There are just other facts -- and yeah coincidences can happen, but one of the ones I really like is that the head of security at WTC, 9/11 was his first day, which is just weird. He died. Who starts on a Tuesday?
-Some strike team, probably.
FLASHBACK: On Sept. 12, 2001, Alex Jones Blamed the Terrorist Attacks on Israel, Claimed We Would Get ‘Nuked’ And It Would Be Their Fault
Alex Jones owes the families of the Sandy Hook victims millions of dollars for his defamatory garbage lies, with more lawsuits still pending, but his status as a rotten-to-the-core spewer of rancid bovine excrement is far from a new development.
www.mediaite.com
So...so...so what evidence would you look for in the rubble to support this? What would survive the fire or what would be the fingerprints of this style of demolition?
Commercial explosives are very safe. Can be burned (unconfined) and will not detonate. The og Electric blasting caps are indeed sensitive to stray current unintended detonation, but electrics were rarely used in 2001. Det cord and Nonel were used then, and are not susceptible to electrical interference, lightning strike excluded.
Sounds absurd because it is absurd. Google the cgi planes. They think you're stupid, goyim.
Thermite is a Jesse Ventura red herring disinformation gimmick.
I don't know what I think anymore. I was 18 when it happened. 9/11 and the time in 8th grade when we had a teacher came over from the high school to the middle to give us a speech that if we didn't go to college, we would end up dead beats, are the 2 most detailed days I remember.
To think the government could pull this off is kind of funny. Government workers are trash. Also, I'm sure someone would of broke by now?
But, I find it odd 21 years later a plane full of people couldn't stop arabs with... boxcutters?
To think the government could pull this off is kind of funny. Government workers are trash. Also, I'm sure someone would of broke by now?
But, I find it odd 21 years later a plane full of people couldn't stop arabs with... boxcutters?
The average government employee is retarded, because it doesn’t matter. The citizen has to accept this because his dollar doesn’t matter since it’s not capitalism. The government will send police to your house to collect their money regardless. Intelligence operations however, are not. They by nature can’t be stupid, less the “enemy” discover your plan. It’s very easy to find on wiki leaks just how sophisticated the CIA’s spying network is. They do not higher morons to do their work. The Mossad, in this case, are no different. Israel needed a way to convince America to neuter it’s enemies. Enough of the right people in America could profit off of it, the rest can probably be blackmailed. How do you stop the media from finding out? Same way you stopped the people who don’t want to play along. Or, you give them “sources” that are intentionally spreading disinformation. If there’s going to be someone to trust during a “time of attack” it’s the government. Our entire society is predicated on the idea we need them to keep us safe. Who’s going to question it?
Because they thought the hijackers were taking everyone to Cuba or some shit. And they said they had a bomb.
Never would of happened if Hitler would have won.
I wonder what equivalent of 911 would a Hitler world have....?....Never would of happened if Hitler would have won.
Everyone in the world knows our government participated except half of Americans. Nearly the whole world is laughing at us.
G
guest
Guest
What am I reading here?