I Wanna See the Courthouse Movie! Updated Schedules, Links to Casefiles

[Harry Powell]

WE WIN! We win!! SOMEONE get ahold of Patso immediately

 

[Opesterino]

16, dick, ect. Is this final ? do we have to wait until tomorrow to be sure? Either way this is a nice way to start things off.


Fuck you Patrick S Tominson.

 

[guest]

Knock, knock! It's the monster! Remember me? You can't sign this away three times.

 

[Uncle Anthony Cumia]

tentative ruling has been posted

View attachment 8067

Ohhhhh I see that latern, trimmed on the low level and burning away. The cost of justice is fleeting because now a Tubby Pig owes 17k, Quasi sleep with feather of Angels stuck beneath your head, the regulator, swinging pendulum


We win you fat failure. Quasis win is our win, your loss is all yours you fat piece of shit. Go get fucked you tiny dicked larper.

 

[Kim_Jong_Poon_]

16, dick, ect. Is this final ? do we have to wait until tomorrow to be sure? Either way this is a nice way to start things off.


Fuck you Patrick S Tominson.

It's over, Johnny

 

[Uncle Anthony Cumia]

Covid Cumia go ahead and text the fat failure proof of his L. I’m salivating at seeing his narcissistic lies to claim victory.

 

[MunchausenByProxy]

 

[Cuphead]

 

[Will Tate]

Covid Cumia go ahead and text the fat failure proof of his L. I’m salivating at seeing his narcissistic lies to claim victory.

Quasi's already informed him, it seems.

Rahuul Kumar

Rahuul Kumar has 12 books on Goodreads, and is currently reading In Shambles by Sam Goodno

www.goodreads.com

 

[RobertMewler]

HOW DOES THAT FEEL, FUCKER!??

 

[Mr-Wrinkle-Paws]

thaT is whaT appeals are for liTTle baby child....

View attachment 8078

With a appeal, doesn't the losers side need to show how the judge's decision was wrong legally?

 

[guest]

[URL]https://twitter.com/stealthygeek/status/1443329638651109381?s=20[/URL]

 

[guest]

In regards to the hearing tomorrow this is a tentative ruling so either party has the right to contest it and then will have to appear for arguments.

[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/sdcourt/civil2/civiltentativerulings[/URL]

A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time.


Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the court’s [URL='https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/sdcourt/CIVIL2/CIVILICVIRTUALHEARINGS']Civil Independent Calendar Hearings[/URL] webpage.


Failure to appear shall be deemed a waiver of oral argument. If neither party appears at the scheduled hearing, the tentative ruling shall become the final order of the court on the date set for the hearing.


Tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day

 

[LongIslandchomper]

I sure hope no one texts Patso for a reaction

@covidcumia

 

[Will Tate]

The judge pro tem's recommendation is only adopted in part, liTTle infanT baby child! Wait for what comes necksxxxxt!

Calling it now.

 

[Kim_Jong_Poon_]

https://twitter.com/stealthygeek/status/1443329638651109381?s=20View attachment 8082

@ToldYouSoPat shattered my ribs

 

[JumboYumYums]

Quasi's already informed him, it seems.

Rahuul Kumar

Rahuul Kumar has 12 books on Goodreads, and is currently reading In Shambles by Sam Goodno

www.goodreads.com

Oh fuck, he also doing the gay pointing at his temple thing like fatso's twitter pic. He taunts the piglet.

 

[Cuphead]

In regards to the hearing tomorrow this is a tentative ruling so either party has the right to contest it and then will have to appear for arguments.

Civil - Tentative Rulings | Superior Court of California - County of San Diego

www.sdcourt.ca.gov

Will that bald fucker even appear tomorrow to argue?

 

[Will Tate]

Will that bald fucker even appear tomorrow to argue?

Fuck do I hope so.

 

[guest]

With a appeal, doesn't the losers side need to show how the judge's decision was wrong legally?

Yes, it's basically procedural. You also generally can't introduce new evidence (though very rarely it can happen).