I Wanna See the Courthouse Movie! - Part 3

[Cuphead]

You would've thought the judge would be good pals with my man Jerry

 

[guest]

The pro tem's tentative is so egregiously incorrect you can't read anything into it. It will be interesting to see what he says once Jerry explains everything he literally put in his response. But assuming Jerry objected properly, this goes before the real judge anyway. It's not an uphill battle, Quasi is entitled to everything in the subpoena. Jerry made the case in his subpoena and response. The pro tem didn't read it.

Read Jerry's response again. It is very clear.

I believe in Jerry. SFWA and Patrick aren't gonna Technicality Tomlinson their way out of this one.

 

[guest]

View attachment 42683

You would've thought the judge would be good pals with my man Jerry

Jerry's "based" out of LA, not SF.

 

[Stent]

All these chinks. Are they building another railroad in California?

 

[FranksWirecutters]

WWAW starting an anonymous donation thing to back Quasi up for being the realest ass dude of all time?

I don't know if it works because I'm 16 and all, that but I heard if you use brave browser and agree to the ads you can send your BAT crypto from clicking ads to the website. You can keep it anon by not connecting brave to a wallet, don't know how it works on the website owners end though or even if it's possible.

BAT isn't worth much but it's something to keep the lights on

 

[Kim_Jong_Poon_]

It's not an uphill battle

I hope Jen goes into court with that Alpha mindset. I'm not going to cope and act like this is a good thing. But if the judge will legitimately hear his arguments, he has a good shot. I just think this judge has it in his mind that to subpoena SFWA would be equal to granting Jen a subpoena to Disney for his + subscription

 

[VoodooChild]

. The pro tem didn't read it.

Noo, pro Tem child, you didn'T lisTen! Maybe iT was your ADHD or whaTever is wrong wiTh you!
-Jerry Jen, 5/19/22

 

[JoeCumiawearsDIAPERS]

The pro tem's tentative is so egregiously incorrect you can't read anything into it. It will be interesting to see what he says once Jerry explains everything he literally put in his response. But assuming Jerry objected properly, this goes before the real judge anyway. It's not an uphill battle, Quasi is entitled to everything in the subpoena. Jerry made the case in his subpoena and response. The pro tem didn't read it.

Read Jerry's response again. It is very clear.

Thanks for clarifying. Hopefully I’m way off base and Jerry cock slaps the SFWA.

The Virgin @JoeCumiawearsDIAPERS vs. the Chad @notalawyer

 

[SmellenShoehorn]

Jerry's "based" out of LA, not SF.

"Your motion is denied, you owe the SFWA $5,000, and oh by the way its legal to ransack drug stores and shit in the street."

 

[Cuphead]

I hope Jen goes into court with that Alpha mindset. I'm not going to cope and act like this is a good thing. But if the judge will legitimately hear his arguments, he has a good shot. I just think this judge has it in his mind that to subpoena SFWA would be equal to granting Jen a subpoena to Disney for his + subscription

The thing is Jerry has to prove to the judge they have a good reason for knowing that the SFWA the money to Patrick to fund the lawsuit and I don't think he can use the audio recordings from the Josiah tapes. He's going to need to have some good reasoning or some sort of proof. I'm also wondering since the judge didn't read the opposition if maybe he doesn't know that this is all happening because Patrick hasn't paid legal fees.

 

[guest]

"Your motion is denied, you owe the SFWA $5,000, and oh by the way its legal to ransack drug stores and shit in the street."

That's where we are out in that shit hole.

 

[Kim_Jong_Poon_]

its legal to ransack drug stores and shit in the street.

 

[guest]

Yes. The tentative reads like Quasi sent a subpoena for some other reason. What the judge thinks that is isn't clear.

Petitioner John Doe 1, has not supplied "evidence demonstrating a reasonable relationship between the materials sought to be produced and the issues involved in the case."

It doesn't say it was deficient. It says there was none supplied.

Opposing party has not made such a showing in the declaration submitted in opposition to the motion to quash.

Again, it doesn't say it was not substantial, it says "no showing".

I hope Jen goes into court with that Alpha mindset. I'm not going to cope and act like this is a good thing. But if the judge will legitimately hear his arguments, he has a good shot. I just think this judge has it in his mind that to subpoena SFWA would be equal to granting Jen a subpoena to Disney for his + subscription

It's not good or bad. It's essentially neutral since nothing in the tentative was relevant.

 

[guest]

I’m Not a lawyer but here’s my read on this bitch.

It’s preliminary so JJ has the chance to argue his case. To me, it’s a matter of determining if Jerry and Doe 1 feel it’s is in their best interests to proceed with arguing their case.

Basically, Quasi needs to decide if he wants to go the Patrick route of doubling down and possibly compounding his losses or cutting it off to limit the damage. This is the Judge Stein hearing equivalent of the process.

It was an uphill battle from the start because the burden of proof is on Jerry and Quasi. All the virgins at SFWA need to do is discredit and deflect well enough to get it tossed.

At the end of the day, the courts have ruled Patrick owes money and this doesn’t change that. All it means is Jerry can’t crowbar the SFWA’s books at this time.

WWAW starting an anonymous donation thing to back Quasi up for being the realest ass dude of all time?

Makes Mola Ram look like a punk ass biatch.

 

[guest]

Question. Say worst case Quasi has to pay SFWAs legal fees, is it possible that gets billed to Pat as part of the collection? So Quasi pays 5K and then Pat's debt goes up 5k, it's not his fault that they have to throw darts to get compliance with the judgement against Pat. I can't understand why a good faith collection attempt against a guy might not ensnare people you suspect wrongly and they shouldn't have to pay their own fees, but the party responsible for all of this is Pat, so can this eventually be collected off of him if Quasi pays SFWA's fees?

Possibly. If Jerry can find a statute then he'd need to file a motion for it. I'm not sure what that would be off the top of my head.

 

[guest]

Possibly. If Jerry can find a statute then he'd need to file a motion for it. I'm not sure what that would be off the top of my head.

Don't want the extra drama for Quasi, but wow if this pushes his debt to say 50k to and he then starts saying SFWA gave him the money this could be an awesome crash and burn.

 

[Harry Powell]

Yes. The tentative reads like Quasi sent a subpoena for some other reason. What the judge thinks that is isn't clear.



It doesn't say it was deficient. It says there was none supplied.



Again, it doesn't say it was not substantial, it says "no showing".




It's not good or bad. It's essentially neutral since nothing in the tentative was relevant.

Opposing party has not made such a showing in the declaration submitted in opposition to the motion to quash.

Doesn’t what I just put in bold mean that the pro tem did read the declaration but doesn’t find it adequate?

 

[Harry Powell]

I'm not sure how much we could raise but I'm down for some anonymous funding.

BDQ has consistently declined to accept funds. Maybe when all the dust is settled we can get him a nice toilet and bidet set.

 

[Gay Faggot.]

BDQ has consistently declined to accept funds. Maybe when all the dust is settled we can get him a nice toilet and bidet set.

Why? He doesn’t need lawn ornaments.

 

[guest]

Opposing party has not made such a showing in the declaration submitted in opposition to the motion to quash.

Doesn’t what I just put in bold mean that the pro tem did read the declaration but doesn’t find it adequate?

Or just skimmed and assumed the final SFWA motion would accurately recap BDJ's arguments. Same problem with kicking it to a judge later - he may assume the pro tem did his homework thoroughly.