• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

GNAA Member Jackie Singh has a meltdown after her racist, transphobic and pedophilic IRC logs were uploaded to nanaimg.net.

RickReternal

I hope people Ouija you tweets after your dead
Forum Clout
45,094
IMO Jax locking down her Twitter account this morning pretty much confirms the authenticity.
I tend to agree BUT on the other hand she was getting trolled like crazy in her replies by KF users mad at her trying to get Moon suspended. She could claim mah mentals/their racism as why she locked.
 

quasi101

the $83,736.99 fugitive
Forum Clout
78,276
IMO Jax locking down her Twitter account this morning pretty much confirms the authenticity.
thats jackie --> dushatar levels of bad logic. Please sir, don't do that.

You can't post hoc (ergo propter hoc) attribute a human's response as evidence. I mean you can but you look dumb doing it. It will always be undetermined. If she left her twitter open and posted her usual clown emoji i totally don't care guys for real. You'd say she was overcompensating or projecting.

This is the exact problem of underdetermination.
 

quasi101

the $83,736.99 fugitive
Forum Clout
78,276
This is the same logical error

1702589306960.png




He didn't deny it in the right way, so that's evidence of his guilt.
 

TheGhostOfBernellTrammell

Getting my rocks off. Emptying my boulders.
Forum Clout
12,255
What evidence is there those chat logs are real? It'd be nice if the evidence was unimpeachable before spreading it around.
This leak is a chat log that was covered in the news previously. Here's the article which has the following excerpt: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...t-participated-in-racist-internet-troll-group

1702607775141.png


So others in the IRC chat have said that they are real. It's worth noting that #2600 was not a GNAA channel itself but there was user overlap in their circles.
 

BoomerSperg

Forum Clout
23,220
thats jackie --> dushatar levels of bad logic. Please sir, don't do that.

You can't post hoc (ergo propter hoc) attribute a human's response as evidence. I mean you can but you look dumb doing it. It will always be undetermined. If she left her twitter open and posted her usual clown emoji i totally don't care guys for real. You'd say she was overcompensating or projecting.

This is the exact problem of underdetermination.
She hasn't denied it in the specific way I wanted her to so it's true.
 
Top