I accidentally outed my cousin’s husband for not ever wearing one to my aunt when we were all drinking. I don’t know how you can drive with the constant dinging. At least the old ones shut off.
-
- Mr. Tomlinson's feud started after members of the now-defunct Reddit site r/opieandanthony got his Twitter account suspended, causing him to threaten some bored trolls who never heard of him with a libel lawsuit. The trolls responded predictably.
- Mr. Tomlinson has been instructed many times by friends, family, police, and attorneys to stop engaging with his trolls, and that continuing to provoke them will cause him to be trolled even more. Mr. Tomlinson wilfully ignores this advice.
- He would eventually file a defamation suit against 60 anonymous people which was dismissed with Mr. Tomlinson being ordered to pay $34,762.25 for opposing parties' attorney fees.
- He ended up paying $83,736.99 due to his unsuccessful attempts to dodge the court-ordered judgement, for which he faced jail time and contempt charges.
- He also filed 2 frivolous restraining orders against people who had engaged in First Amendment-protected behavior (one for texting him and another for attending his contempt of court hearing), both of which were dismissed.
- Early on in the lawsuit, Mr. Tomlinson vandalized his own motorcycle and submitted a false police report blaming the people he was suing.
- He accidentally sent surveillance video of the alleged vandal to a troll. The individual in the video is very obviously Patrick S. Tomlinson.
- Mr. Tomlinson has never submitted this video footage during any of his many media tours, and desperately tries to scrub it from the internet.
- Mr. Tomlinson claims that the surveillance video was initiated by his "motion-activated" camera, which only collects "30 seconds at a time", despite the video being 32 seconds long and beginning several seconds before the "vandal" enters into the frame.
- On 13 April 2023, the individual responsible for calling the fake emergences (SWATs) to Mr. Tomlinson's house, a SWAT-for-hire dealer named "Torswats", revealed that Mr. Tomlinson ordered the SWATs to his own house because he wanted to get in the news and sue the MPD for money.
- Torswats would repeat these allegations in private chats which were not intended for public view.
- Mr. Tomlinson has gone on multiple news tours since the SWATtings started in order to promote his victimhood brand, utilizing the services of Lenora Claire.
- He also recently sued the MPD for money.
Do you wear a seatbelt when you drive?
- Thread starter BonnieMcFarlaneMe2
- Start date
I accidentally outed my cousin’s husband for not ever wearing one to my aunt when we were all drinking. I don’t know how you can drive with the constant dinging. At least the old ones shut off.
Huh? Of course...
No because it's uncomfortable. I just buckle it behind me. Massachusetts is one of the few states where it's not a primary stop violation, so you can only be cited if you're pulled over for something else. The legislature keeps voting it down because it's "racist" to pull people over for not wearing it. We also have the lowest rate of seat belt usage in the country except for NH, where there is no seat belt law for adults.
Last edited:
I don't want to go through the windshield child
G
guest
Guest
I'd rather not pinball around inside the car if there's an accident. I also make everyone else wear theirs so they don't pinball around inside the car if there's an accident.
G
guest
Guest
What are you - five? I love you Ruthie but what the fuck are you doing?
My parents set a very bad example for me. I know I should wear it on the highway at least.
Last edited:
I assume niggers have no problem with this.
G
guest
Guest
Safe just isn't your speed.
G
guest
Guest
By rights I should car crash this post but I'm feeling superstitious
I do, but not because I'm told to.
'dont step on snek' & 'I don't want to die' are not mutually exclusive
'dont step on snek' & 'I don't want to die' are not mutually exclusive
G
guest
Guest
G
guest
Guest
On the highway, yes. If I'm just cruising around, not really. My mom worked in a hospital when I was a teenager and I would have to listen to all the stories of kids coming in being thrown threw a windshield, and kids who where it saved their life. Who knows what was true, but it kind of worked.
I've always found the people who buckle it behind them to be retarded. I mean I like ya Rutherford too, but also wonder what is he doing?
I've always found the people who buckle it behind them to be retarded. I mean I like ya Rutherford too, but also wonder what is he doing?
Instead of babbling about work to you she should’ve been going over your spelling homework, stupid
a windsceen (windsheild) to-the-face is probably more uncomfortable... it's not selling out to wear a seatbelt my dude.
you know I'm die-hard anti most government intervention, you shouldn't be pulled-over for not wearing it, just wear it for you... if you hit someone who's not wearing one then you can (unlike them) probably drive home
I'm retarded.
When I’m out on my family’s property I click it in behind me but I’ve gotten into a bad habit of leaving it that way when I leave and go back to town.
I was talking to a firefighter about it and he said he used to do the same because if you get t-boned you can get crushed in your seat and it’s the lesser of two evils to go flying across the cab.
I was talking to a firefighter about it and he said he used to do the same because if you get t-boned you can get crushed in your seat and it’s the lesser of two evils to go flying across the cab.
that's much more succint reasoning than I gave, so fair enough
It takes a special brand of retard to buy a device that disables seat belts. Ever see someone fly through a windshield? It's not pretty. Then again, perhaps it's a good way to weed out those we'd all be better off without.