Anyone watched any of the Darrell Brooks Trial?

[AntSucks]

This guy really makes an argument for the death penalty. What deterrent is this going to be for similar criminals? He got all the attention he wanted. The next mass murderer that comes along will probably want to top this guy.

 

[guest]

I was on jury duty on a case where this guy had gone into the senate and started yelling at them while they were in session.

[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/crime/protester-is-arrested-for-outburst-during-supreme-court-arguments/2015/04/28/c8d5e65c-edea-11e4-8abc-d6aa3bad79dd_story.html[/URL]

He was representing himself and dude was hilarious, I wish they recorded it. We convicted him but I never went and looked up what his punishment was.

 

[Monk]

Darrell Brooks' inspiration for his legal defense:

 

[Meownaw]

Darrell Brooks' inspiration for his legal defense:

As much of a faggot Tim is this makes me howl. I thought the same thing watching this trial

 

[guest]

 

[guest]

This case was amazing to behold. Should they have given him as much leeway as they did? Absolutely not. Did it produce amazing hilarity? Absolutely. So my hats off to the judge for the free entertainment. Also I'd like to see under her court gown.

What was everyone's favorite Brooksism? GROUNZ was a good one. Objecting all the time when they used his name was too.

 

[quark]

View attachment 73167

So I heard your mom died. Go

 

[TheNanaDook]

I like courtroom arguments and general sperging if the case is interesting. The Waukesha parade massacre was already an interest of mine since it's clearly a black nationalist trying to terrorize white families during holiday festivities. The trial itself though is above and beyond what I could have expected. Darrell Brooks has chosen to represent himself and has used sovereign citizen style arguments to try to get himself out of the case at every turn and has done nothing but disrupt the proceedings. I should try to make a supercut of the insanity. It's rather dry but can be extremely humorous at times. For instance, any time the opposing party objects he immediately says "GROUNDS" (sounds like "grounz") before they can even give a reason for their objection.

Highlights include:

• Brooks argues with the judge every change he can and actively tries to be held in contempt of court
• Anytime someone says his name, "Darrell Brooks" or "Mr. Brooks" he says "objection I do not consent to being called that name"
• Brooks objects to every question the prosecution asks with random reasons, usually "Leading" or "Relevancy" even when the questions are not leading or the questions are relevant to something he asked on cross-examination
• Brooks claims there is no opposing party. The state of Wisconsin is who is prosecuting him since this is a criminal complaint and he tries to ask all witnesses about this and how there is no one accusing him of any crime.
• Far more stuff I'm failing to recall because this shit is so tiring

what a nigger

 

[chocolatehellhole]

subject matter jurisdiction.