• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

Anyone watched any of the Darrell Brooks Trial?

G

guest

Guest
I like courtroom arguments and general sperging if the case is interesting. The Waukesha parade massacre was already an interest of mine since it's clearly a black nationalist trying to terrorize white families during holiday festivities. The trial itself though is above and beyond what I could have expected. Darrell Brooks has chosen to represent himself and has used sovereign citizen style arguments to try to get himself out of the case at every turn and has done nothing but disrupt the proceedings. I should try to make a supercut of the insanity. It's rather dry but can be extremely humorous at times. For instance, any time the opposing party objects he immediately says "GROUNDS" (sounds like "grounz") before they can even give a reason for their objection.

Highlights include:
  • Brooks argues with the judge every change he can and actively tries to be held in contempt of court
  • Anytime someone says his name, "Darrell Brooks" or "Mr. Brooks" he says "objection I do not consent to being called that name"
  • Brooks objects to every question the prosecution asks with random reasons, usually "Leading" or "Relevancy" even when the questions are not leading or the questions are relevant to something he asked on cross-examination
  • Brooks claims there is no opposing party. The state of Wisconsin is who is prosecuting him since this is a criminal complaint and he tries to ask all witnesses about this and how there is no one accusing him of any crime.
  • Far more stuff I'm failing to recall because this shit is so tiring
 
TehSamurai

TehSamurai

‎
‎
Randy Weaver said:
He's a shining example of why lynching's were a thing. This jew judge is a complete weakling. He's been treated with the utmost courteousness and respect, and he cannot help but chimp out and think he's being treated unfairly. If he was White, he would of been admonished ten times over already.
Click to expand...
You think the judge doesn't know what she is doing? She's going to destroy him during sentencing, and when he tries to appeal the verdicts, he will be laughed at later on.
 
Randy Weaver

Randy Weaver

‎
Kim_Jong_Poon_ said:
She's only giving him this much slack so the families don't have to deal with any appeals. I can't hate on her for it, but I do realize she'd probably be a complete cunt in a normal trial to a defendant
Click to expand...
TehSamurai said:
You think the judge doesn't know what she is doing? She's going to destroy him during sentencing, and when he tries to appeal the verdicts, he will be laughed at later on.
Click to expand...
No matter the course this farce of a trial went, he was getting consecutive life sentences. There isn't much she can do anyway except remove him to an adjacent court room since he stupidly decided in his infinite wisdom to represent himself.
 
not that Jack Horner

not that Jack Horner

If you saw me IRL you very likely wouldn't look me
‎
‎
TheGhostOfAbeVigoda said:
The sovereign citizen shit is generally laughably retarded. Tenfold in this context.

This guy is the only cool one I've seen:

Click to expand...


Sovereign citizens make more sense to me than gender reassignment surgery, but everyone has to go along with a hairy guy in a dress breast feeding a baby and applaud

this dude rules btw, that bitch aint ever right

“no bitch, i live in myself. im the living man. sometimes i sleep at that address, i thought judges were smart fuck

edit: this guy is the king, he is yelling at the judge to come back here and shut up



the living man rules
 
Last edited:
Imager

Imager

I see penises everywhere
‎
‎
Kim_Jong_Poon_ said:
She's only giving him this much slack so the families don't have to deal with any appeals. I can't hate on her for it, but I do realize she'd probably be a complete cunt in a normal trial to a defendant
Click to expand...
No. If a White nationalist ran over a bunch of niggers at a Mardi Gras parade, that White nationalist would not get to make a 50-minute speech to the court and would have already been barred from being in the same courtroom.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top