No i think that because somehow “the government is too much in our lives” usually comes back to “What even IS an age of consent anyway?”
-
Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it.
Do not post IRL pranks here without including the source
Yes.
- Thread starter Suetonius
- Start date
Does it? Because in my experience it's mostly debate around healthcare, education, and property. I don't think most people think "fucking children" when they think politics. But that's just me.
Oh so you learned that most people are smarter than libertarians
Same argument as saying all priests fuck kids.
I don’t know. Republicans have been arrested for being pedos. Democrats have been arrested for being pedos. But only the Libertarians make the age of consent such an issue their running politicians and even the vice chair of the convention have put it in their platforms.
Priests don’t run around arguing they’re converting the kids to jesus by fucking them
You could have just said "all priests do fuck kids" and I would have conceded defeat
I would never say something that succinct
I was going to type out a detailed response about why you have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about on this subject and suggest some background reading, but what’s the point?
I’ll just call you a faggot instead
G
guest
Guest
The only thing worse than libertarians that act like they have some hidden knowledge because they read hayek and rothbard are the smug reddit types (see: my pfp) that act like that was a phase of mine, but I grew up.
Time to act like an adult and join the real word, bud.
Shutup, stupid.
If michael ray bower started this thread, it would be titled, "YESSSH"
Everyone had that phase and it's called kindergarten.
excuse me, sir... I feel like you must be projecting.
Just because the government have proven themselves to not be more capable/intelligent than me, & are corrupt... doesn't mean I want to fuck kids... where did that even come from? Oh yeah, from you. WTF?
Maybe all gays want to fuck kids
I would rather trust a French philosopher around a child than a libertarian
why would a french philosopher be interested in a libertarian?
but c'mon now, just 'cus I see fault in elitest government it doesn't mean I'm a fucking creep... & just going by UK government, they're far more likely to be kid-fuckers than libertarians... but let's not stop there; Alistair Crowly / Maria Abramavich, bohemian grove... nice perverted government insiders, stupid.
If you knew anything about the history of political philosophy and theory you would understand how stupid this statement was.
it's hilarious, I do find it cute... similar to how a french philosopher would find a retarded child (which is basically what Sue is)
BefuddledBoyGeorge.jog
Libertarianism works with high-agency Whites. But any form of government would suffice.
When you add jews to 'libertarianism,' you get the current form state of that party, all of whom should be fed to a wood chipper.
He’s basically just a likeable version of Patrick (with an admittedly good sense of humor). Spouting off about stuff based on Wikipedia
He can join @NewJersey.gov in my introduction to political science class.