• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

Why do you like wrestling?

Riccardo Bosi

Riccardo Bosi

has janny powers
‎
‎
Forum Clout
70,203
I think the Patrice Oneal explanation is good: it's stuntmen who also have to be good actors.

It's no different than action movies where you know it's fictional but the art of it is making you briefly believe that the stakes are important. Can you sell the idea to a large audience that the outcome of the main event will alter the course of some imagined history? It's some crazy psychology where the majority of the audience knows it's fake, the wrestlers are not trying to really injure one another, but everybody is in on the con and it makes money. But up to a point, wrestlers would be their characters in real life, never letting on that it's fake. So it sticks out as an industry. Also there's the athletic aspect of it; there's guys like Kurt Angle and Brock Lesnar who are true athletes who've spent most of their careers doing this.

I think a good example is this match, because quickly you understand who's the good guy, who's the bad guy, why the stakes are important, why certain actions take place... and then everything is done impeccably and crisply, and then it becomes a paradox in a way because you know they're not intending on hurting each other, but how the fuck do they do this shit and not get injured all the time. Well, Rey's beat the fuck up now (but still doing it) and Eddie's dead from his heart exploding, but still.




But really the main appeal is the big characters. Stone Cold ruled because he was a redneck who drank beers and hit his boss in the head with a bedpan. There's no mystery in that.
 
Riccardo Bosi

Riccardo Bosi

has janny powers
‎
‎
Forum Clout
70,203
Also there's weird real shit that lead to the boom of it in the late 90s, like they take something that was "unscripted" like the Montreal Screwjob and they play up the reality of it which lead to the creation of the Vince McMahon character who was the on-screen owner of the company... which he had been the whole time. When they do the Larry David/George Costanza "there's your show, that's your show" thing where the reality or the real drama IS the story, that's actually interesting. That's why Stone Cold's rise was entertaining: Vince legitimately didn't see him as the top guy, but the fans loved him. The Rock's tied into this too, as he was a guy who stunk, so then they made him a bad guy and then got popular and now he's the biggest Hollywood attraction. Rock debuted in 1996 and his last full calendar year in wrestling was 2000. The actual wrestling aspect has nearly nothing to do with why it's popular.
 
D

Dennyislife

‎
‎
Forum Clout
21,646
I liked it as a kid. It was one of the N64 games that got me into it for a few years during the whole Austin v Vince and The Rock era. I grew out of it a couple of years later.

It's fine for kids to like I guess considering the utter shite my nephew likes like "is it cake" or cartoons but even as a kid I was confused as to why so many in the crowd were adults and not even parents
 
Sue Lightning

Sue Lightning

IS SHE TALKING ABOUT ME?
‎
‎
Forum Clout
119,161
Riccardo Bosi said:
I think the Patrice Oneal explanation is good: it's stuntmen who also have to be good actors.

It's no different than action movies where you know it's fictional but the art of it is making you briefly believe that the stakes are important. Can you sell the idea to a large audience that the outcome of the main event will alter the course of some imagined history? It's some crazy psychology where the majority of the audience knows it's fake, the wrestlers are not trying to really injure one another, but everybody is in on the con and it makes money. But up to a point, wrestlers would be their characters in real life, never letting on that it's fake. So it sticks out as an industry. Also there's the athletic aspect of it; there's guys like Kurt Angle and Brock Lesnar who are true athletes who've spent most of their careers doing this.

I think a good example is this match, because quickly you understand who's the good guy, who's the bad guy, why the stakes are important, why certain actions take place... and then everything is done impeccably and crisply, and then it becomes a paradox in a way because you know they're not intending on hurting each other, but how the fuck do they do this shit and not get injured all the time. Well, Rey's beat the fuck up now (but still doing it) and Eddie's dead from his heart exploding, but still.




But really the main appeal is the big characters. Stone Cold ruled because he was a redneck who drank beers and hit his boss in the head with a bedpan. There's no mystery in that.
Click to expand...

I remember hearing something about how the showrunner (who wasn’t Vince but i cant remember his name) was upset about how when Vince really took the reigns he changed wrestling in some way. Something about storylines? I wish i could remember
 
Sue Lightning

Sue Lightning

IS SHE TALKING ABOUT ME?
‎
‎
Forum Clout
119,161
HH Brother said:
Click to expand...

3829B318-8929-4AF9-8218-26BA5B9D1573.jpeg

I appreciate you taking Vincespiration for the pedostache, funster.
 
Riccardo Bosi

Riccardo Bosi

has janny powers
‎
‎
Forum Clout
70,203
Sue Lightning said:
I remember hearing something about how the showrunner (who wasn’t Vince but i cant remember his name) was upset about how when Vince really took the reigns he changed wrestling in some way. Something about storylines? I wish i could remember
Click to expand...
Well, there was Vince Russo who urged McMahon to make wrestling more "reality based" and to keep the product up with the times.

There's other guys who worked with Russo and McMahon like Bruce Prichard who talks shit about Russo, but he's a notorious liar, and Jim Cornette who is a wrestling genius who absolutely DESPISES Russo, but even that may be a work. The podcasts about wrestling are the most interesting aspect of the business at the moment.
 
johnnynoname

johnnynoname

I have a face like a shovel
‎
‎
Forum Clout
19,504
Riccardo Bosi said:
I think the Patrice Oneal explanation is good: it's stuntmen who also have to be good actors.

It's no different than action movies where you know it's fictional but the art of it is making you briefly believe that the stakes are important. Can you sell the idea to a large audience that the outcome of the main event will alter the course of some imagined history? It's some crazy psychology where the majority of the audience knows it's fake, the wrestlers are not trying to really injure one another, but everybody is in on the con and it makes money. But up to a point, wrestlers would be their characters in real life, never letting on that it's fake. So it sticks out as an industry. Also there's the athletic aspect of it; there's guys like Kurt Angle and Brock Lesnar who are true athletes who've spent most of their careers doing this.

I think a good example is this match, because quickly you understand who's the good guy, who's the bad guy, why the stakes are important, why certain actions take place... and then everything is done impeccably and crisply, and then it becomes a paradox in a way because you know they're not intending on hurting each other, but how the fuck do they do this shit and not get injured all the time. Well, Rey's beat the fuck up now (but still doing it) and Eddie's dead from his heart exploding, but still.




But really the main appeal is the big characters. Stone Cold ruled because he was a redneck who drank beers and hit his boss in the head with a bedpan. There's no mystery in that.
Click to expand...

yo...can I borrow your STARDOM password?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top