• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

White supremacist eric hildeman is spiraling

PorqueDealer

PorqueDealer

Portly Pepperoni Purveyor
‎
‎
Forum Clout
38,125
DominusOdium said:
6,240 words.

Nobody anywhere reads articles that amount to "I watch enough MSNBC to regurgitate it back onto my blog" longer than 3k and the best performing word counts online, according to many studies, is around 2500. A 6-8k article would be broken up by most magazines or newspapers if it was a long form investigative piece. This is some uninformed self important jerk off pedophile in Wisconsin blurting out DNC talking points for almost 3 times the optimal blog or online article length so he can convince himself that despite getting ZERO ENGAGEMENT on his blog, he's a writer, an intellectual and dare I say a firebrand.
Click to expand...

He's just building up to Huffpost.net levels.
 
Turry Fawks

Turry Fawks

Dean of Dog Piss Studies at Waterlooniversity
‎
Forum Clout
31,927
NoBacon said:
Who are the other gay pedophiles in question? You?
Click to expand...
You admitted to being a gay pedophile one day. You tried to play it off as a joke by posting a Breaking Bad meme but we all know the truth
 
Udders

Udders

Deeply interwoven in the pest community
‎
‎
Forum Clout
48,049
DominusOdium said:
6,240 words.

Nobody anywhere reads articles that amount to "I watch enough MSNBC to regurgitate it back onto my blog" longer than 3k and the best performing word counts online, according to many studies, is around 2500. A 6-8k article would be broken up by most magazines or newspapers if it was a long form investigative piece. This is some uninformed self important jerk off pedophile in Wisconsin blurting out DNC talking points for almost 3 times the optimal blog or online article length so he can convince himself that despite getting ZERO ENGAGEMENT on his blog, he's a writer, an intellectual and dare I say a firebrand.
Click to expand...
Almost as long as the rumored Huff Post piece on Pat.
 
TorquieTwoBeers

TorquieTwoBeers

‎
‎
Forum Clout
27,032
Odd that he zooms from 1988 to 2006. He was covering plenty of gaffes from the early 70s through the late 80s, then just skips the 90s and early 00s. Anita Hill was 1991. Biden teamed up with Strom Thurmond in 1991 for the Violent Crime Control Act. The Clinton crime bill followed a few years later, enthusiastically supported by Biden. Not saying any of these make Biden racist but it's pretty intellectually dishonest to not even address that shit when it is very notable, instead focusing on pithy quotes from the 70s.
 
captain_kamala

captain_kamala

Calling all simps
‎
‎
Forum Clout
112,114
Can you believe black men have a problem with being called boy? Me neither. Very productive meeting, let's do it again next week.
c1c11e6e59ce5b7ad16a79b7fbb47dee.jpg
 
Easily_Remembered

Easily_Remembered

It looks like she don't have an ass crack lmao
‎
‎
Forum Clout
67,874
Of course he's only comfortable tackling the safe subject of Biden's well documented racism. No way is he going to tackle the issue of Biden's pedophilia. Most likely because he doesn't see an issue with it.

Almost all elected officials are more than likely pedophiles - it's just that Pudding Head Biden is the only one not present enough mentally to even try and conceal it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top