• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

Whats a conspiracy theory you think is 100% bullshit?

bovinebrain

MIND CONTROL!!!
Forum Clout
13,481
That anything other than planes flew into the world trade towers.
A lot of the conspiracies surrounding 9/11 are midwit nonsense. If you take some time to research the structural design of the twin towers, you’ll understand very quickly why they collapsed. Jet fuel may not melt steel beams, but it sure does soften it enough to cause it to collapse. The framed tube / shear core structural design was brilliant as it allowed for wide open office spaces without any awkward support beams, but it was not designed to support the impact and added weight of a 767.

Bin Laden allegedly didn’t even intend to bring the towers down. It just happened to be an unintended side effect of the buildings’ structural design which he definitely jizzed himself while watching.

That said, the theories that the plans of the attacks were known about and intentionally ignored by the Bush administration are highly plausible and at least supported with circumstantial evidence.
 

DMAN

The Surgeon General of ONAForums.net
Forum Clout
47,076
It literally makes no sense. Either the planes were fake (not possible)

There is one called PsyOpera by a video editor who makes a compelling argument that a lot of the live news footage and handheld eyewitness video was employing green screen and keying techniques. Anyone with even an entry level understanding of production can follow his explanation and see with video evidence that a lot of that 9/11 footage is very suspicious.

Two handheld video perspectives from many blocks apart would not have the same exact perspective on the plane if filmed from those vantage points, and yet the video clearly shows the exact same 3d render video of a plane disappearing into a building without a hint of impact other than tiny sparks that looks comically 1999 in their computer-generated imagery.

There is also the case where videos get "updated" with entirely different audio tracks, different voices, etc.
 

Sue Lightning

IS SHE TALKING ABOUT ME?
Forum Clout
119,300
A lot of the conspiracies surrounding 9/11 are midwit nonsense. If you take some time to research the structural design of the twin towers, you’ll understand very quickly why they collapsed. Jet fuel may not melt steel beams, but it sure does soften it enough to cause it to collapse. The framed tube / shear core structural design was brilliant as it allowed for wide open office spaces without any awkward support beams, but it was not designed to support the impact and added weight of a 767.

Bin Laden allegedly didn’t even intend to bring the towers down. It just happened to be an unintended side effect of the buildings’ structural design which he definitely jizzed himself while watching.

That said, the theories that the plans of the attacks were known about and intentionally ignored by the Bush administration are highly plausible and at least supported with circumstantial evidence.
Almost every conspiracy to explain how 9/11 was a conspiracy makes no sense. My favorite is “They HAD to bring the towers done.” Did they, stupid? Like the US couldn’t convince its citizens to go to war with 3000 dead and attacks on NYC + the Pentagon? They had to bring down two buildings to get them REALLY primed for war? Ok.
 

Sue Lightning

IS SHE TALKING ABOUT ME?
Forum Clout
119,300
There is one called PsyOpera by a video editor who makes a compelling argument that a lot of the live news footage and handheld eyewitness video was employing green screen and keying techniques. Anyone with even an entry level understanding of production can follow his explanation and see with video evidence that a lot of that 9/11 footage is very suspicious.

Two handheld video perspectives from many blocks apart would not have the same exact perspective on the plane if filmed from those vantage points, and yet the video clearly shows the exact same 3d render video of a plane disappearing into a building without a hint of impact other than tiny sparks that looks comically 1999 in their computer-generated imagery.

There is also the case where videos get "updated" with entirely different audio tracks, different voices, etc.
Ok. So then we play with the video evidence is faked. How do you explain everyone who clearly watched two planes fly into the towers.

I’m trying not to turn this into the 9/11 thread
 

Sue Lightning

IS SHE TALKING ABOUT ME?
Forum Clout
119,300
"If we can't explain how Black people did it, it must be aliens!"

2,000 years ago, Black people were like the white people of now.
Nobody questions the fact that Rome had running aqueducts, public toilets, water fountains, shopping malls, sports arenas, and a modern society that mirrors ours. But a bunch of niggers arranging blocks in a triangle formation must be the work of aliens.
 

Jims_Maroon_Pants

Joe's Geek Squad Technician
Forum Clout
65,718
A lot of the conspiracies surrounding 9/11 are midwit nonsense. If you take some time to research the structural design of the twin towers, you’ll understand very quickly why they collapsed. Jet fuel may not melt steel beams, but it sure does soften it enough to cause it to collapse. The framed tube / shear core structural design was brilliant as it allowed for wide open office spaces without any awkward support beams, but it was not designed to support the impact and added weight of a 767.

Bin Laden allegedly didn’t even intend to bring the towers down. It just happened to be an unintended side effect of the buildings’ structural design which he definitely jizzed himself while watching.

That said, the theories that the plans of the attacks were known about and intentionally ignored by the Bush administration are highly plausible and at least supported with circumstantial evidence.
It's also wild that the Pentagon pilot was able to pull off that turn fly so low to the ground and actually hit the Pentagon, all with barely any flight time. Incredible
 

Sue Lightning

IS SHE TALKING ABOUT ME?
Forum Clout
119,300
Black people never built shit Egyptians were never black, this is an American black person cope. You never hear of this myth outside the USA
0C6C2B67-E118-4A4F-BC0A-C69F21E677D2.jpeg

7E818754-ECD1-449C-8290-17F1E7D40F6F.jpeg


Looks white to me, funster.
 

DMAN

The Surgeon General of ONAForums.net
Forum Clout
47,076
Ok. So then we play with the video evidence is faked. How do you explain everyone who clearly watched two planes fly into the towers.

I’m trying not to turn this into the 9/11 thread

I've lived in Manhattan all my life. If you are going to be charitable enough to go off of people's memory, you will also include the people who say wild shit like they saw missiles instead of planes. But that doesn't sound to you like what you heard happened from hundreds/thousands of miles away, possibly years after the fact depending on your age.

Whether or not a plane itself could bring a building down is an irrelevant argument when we still don't know what else they all had brought onto the planes with them. If those planes ever even existed.
 
Top