What the FBI does

[HotDogJoe]

From their website..

This insane pig in human form truly believes this organization should be dedicating resources to investigating him being sent mean tweets and texts.

Richard - the FBI are never ever going to help you with this. There is one way to end this and one way only - stop fucking responding. The revenge fantasies you're harboring in that swollen head of yours are never going to happen. You had a full, confirmed ID of one of us and you couldn't even successfully take out a restraining order against him.

Now stop bothering the good folks at the Bureau, you silly pig. They have bigger fish to fry (which says a lot given your heft).

 

[Patrick O'Neal]

> international terrorism

Have you heard the way Dan pronounces the word 'about'?

Someone should foward the podcast to the FBI immediately.

 

[guest]

For all he talks about putting people in jail, it will not surprise me if he ends up there himself. He's already shown multiple times where he'll lie and manufacture evidence to try and lend credibility to his case. He lied in court multiple times about sending BDA threats. It's pretty obvious he made up some of those voicemails. YouWontGetMe1488 has a writing style that sure looks close to Pat's. The fake vandalism video and the "vandalism" itself that wiped off with a paper towel. That obvious plant account on the old board that registered and made threats about him that he included in the lawsuit.

If he actually somehow gets the FBI involved, what does he think they're going to do with all this made up evidence he has? His opsec is terrible. It wouldn't surprise me at all if he logged in from Hooligans or even his house when he made that account on the board. He's probably leaving these voicemails from Niki's phone. The feds will see through this bullshit in a minute and what's gonna happen to him when they find out this is all because he's mad about being called fat and refuses to change his number to end the texts?

 

[guest]

If he does get the FBI involved, it's much more likely to go after Richard's colorful associates with some Child Exploitation Task Force. Unfortunately they'll just ignore him right off the bat.

 

[FurBurger]

The key words in your post are "Mass Destruction" - and Patrick has a lot of mass.

I'm sorry I can't help you, stupid, etc.

 

[guest]

Can someone please explain how this shit he pulled in BDA case isnt perjury?
Unless he has diagnosed mental disorder he lied under oath right?

 

[Missy's Mangled Handster]

Can someone please explain how this shit he pulled in BDA case isnt perjury?
Unless he has diagnosed mental disorder he lied under oath right?

The state isn't going to care about perjury in a civil case where large sums of money are not on the line, if BDA asked the court to prosecute him, they'd tell him to fuck off. The way he goes to prison is if he actually gets the police to start a criminal case against a brotherman like Quasi and he demonstrates Pat lies under oath, which would be really easy.

Take one for the team Rahul.

 

[Slackjawed Cow]

 

[JoeCumiawearsDIAPERS]

The FBI and CIA are primarily tasked with protecting the interests of the wealthy elite (including your savior Joe Biden). They’re a bit more sophisticated than you realize because the criminals are way more sophisticated, Pat. That’s why they hire people who accounting and finance backgrounds.

Cyber crimes would be reserved for people who hack into an investment bank, not for trolls who call a fat man fat.

 

[guest]

Russia is teasing WW3. America's southern border is wide open and it's only a matter of time before there's a Sicario 2 situation and the towel heads smuggle a cell of "martyrs" over. The Chinks are stealing American tech every day and cultivating agents in the States. But the FBI are going to put all that on the back burner and get on the case of some fat faggot in Milwaukee getting teased on the internet for being a pompous and insufferable cunt. His mental illness is breathtaking.

 

[FurBurger]

Can someone please explain how this shit he pulled in BDA case isnt perjury?

Technically it was, but since nobody pressed him on it he could argue that he misspoke or misremembered.

If BDA had a lawyer there, though, he could have queried the pig on the details. If he doubles down and confirms a lie, it's much easier to argue perjury; if he backs off and keeps changing his story... well, good luck getting anyone in authority to listen to him.

 

[guest]

Technically it was, but since nobody pressed him on it he could argue that he misspoke or misremembered.

If BDA had a lawyer there, though, he could have queried the pig on the details. If he doubles down and confirms a lie, it's much easier to argue perjury; if he backs off and keeps changing his story... well, good luck getting anyone in authority to listen to him.

But it is all on tape. So is possible to push it forward?

 

[FurBurger]

But it is all on tape. So is possible to push it forward?

Tell you what - you identify specific, repeated statements in which Pat lied under oath - ones he can't claim he misremembered, or misspoke - and then find someone who's willing to swear under oath that he lied, and present evidence to back that up (don't use BDA, as he might be seen to have a grudge) and then present all that to the Milwaukee PD; and see how you go.

Tweet your driver's licence to Pat while you're at it.

 

[guest]

But it is all on tape. So is possible to push it forward?

Tell you what - you identify specific, repeated statements in which Pat lied under oath - ones he can't claim he misremembered, or misspoke - and then find someone who's willing to swear under oath that he lied, and present evidence to back that up (don't use BDA, as he might be seen to have a grudge) and then present all that to the Milwaukee PD; and see how you go.

Tweet your driver's licence to Pat while you're at it.

Here's the jury instructions in Wisconsin. This is what a jury would be looking to ascertain.

[URL unfurl="true"]https://wilawlibrary.gov/jury/criminal/instruction.php?n=1750[/URL]

 

[guest]

Any lawyer would just argue since he gets thousands of texts (as he claims, if he can prove it), he could reasonably have not remembered.

 

[FurBurger]

Here's the jury instructions in Wisconsin. This is what a jury would be looking to ascertain.

Wisconsin Criminal JI - Wisconsin State Law Library

wilawlibrary.gov

View attachment 37764

> 5. The statement was material to the proceeding.

As I recall, the judge threw out pretty much all of Pat's evidence, so that bit might be tricky.

I'd suggest we hold off on this until he's paid Quasi; as a perjury conviction gets him barred for X years from selling insurance - which I believe is his main source of income.

 

[guest]

Tell you what - you identify specific, repeated statements in which Pat lied under oath - ones he can't claim he misremembered, or misspoke - and then find someone who's willing to swear under oath that he lied, and present evidence to back that up (don't use BDA, as he might be seen to have a grudge) and then present all that to the Milwaukee PD; and see how you go.

Tweet your driver's licence to Pat while you're at it.

Im asking if it is possible, you seem to be in a bad mode today.

 

[JoeCumiawearsDIAPERS]

Any lawyer would just argue since he gets thousands of texts (as he claims, if he can prove it), he could reasonably have not remembered.

He’s stupid too so there’s that