• Recently, onaforums has taken to opening a substack. You can subscribe to this substack to get email notifications when the site is down, gets a new domain name, or is otherwise running into trouble. We are not accepting donations at this time, so please skip the part where it asks if you would like to contribute. Subscribe at onaforums.substack.com

  • Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators. If you want your account deleted, send a private message to @BlackTransLivesMatter

    Do not post IRL pranks here without including the source

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

Welp. Our cyberstlakers just made mass-shooting threats in Madison and Waukesha

quasi101

quasi101

the $83,736.99 fugitive
‎
Forum Clout
82,444
Looks like the original snapchat suit was tossed, appealed, then tossed again



The trial court granted Snap's motion, dismissing the Maynards’ claims without leave to amend for two reasons. First, the court concluded that Snap owed no legal duty to the Maynards because Snap did not owe a duty as a manufacturer to design its product to prevent McGee from driving dangerously or to control McGee's conduct. Second, the court concluded that the Maynards could not establish proximate causation because (a) a driver's inattention, not a mobile phone application, causes a driver to wreck a car, and (b) McGee's criminal and negligent driving, as reflected in her May 17, 2018 plea of no contest to serious injury by vehicle, constituted a superseding and intervening cause that broke the causal chain. The trial court also granted Snap's motion for judgment on the pleadings, concluding that McGee's violation of Snap's Terms of Use and disregard for Snap's pop-up warning broke the causal chain.
Click to expand...


The Court of Appeals granted the Maynards’ application for an interlocutory appeal, and a divided panel affirmed the trial court's determination that Snap did not owe a legal duty to the Maynards. See Maynard, 357 Ga. App. at 498, 502, 851 S.E.2d 128.2
Click to expand...
 
Faggot Boqposter

Faggot Boqposter

The Alawite Assassin
‎
‎
Forum Clout
33,446
admin said:
Yeah its extremely stupid, but a clever way around getting tossed at the onset due to the CDA. As far as I can tell that's all that's happened. It gets around an initial motion to dismiss on 230 grounds, but that's just the minimum prima facie burden (the one Rick couldn't overcome). I doubt it goes anywhere, but who the fuck knows.
Click to expand...
Yeah it’s just clever sophistry and a complicit judge. I guess the schools and mental health institutions have completely outsourced their responsibilities to tranny moderators on social media platforms
 
TorqueWheeler

TorqueWheeler

An enormous amount of muscle.
‎
Forum Clout
78,350
www.lgbtqnation.com

An educator wore a rainbow facemask. Then the bomb threats started. - LGBTQ Nation

Butler Middle School in Waukesha, Wisconsin, has received four bomb threats in the past two weeks.
www.lgbtqnation.com www.lgbtqnation.com

IMG-6920.jpg


🤔
 
Prison Enjoyer

Prison Enjoyer

Status: Enjoying Prison! 😁
‎
‎
Forum Clout
41,978
OpiesDelishHog

OpiesDelishHog

‎
Forum Clout
7,297
F

Farmer Brown

‎
Forum Clout
3,190
Prison Enjoyer said:
Weird, don't think I've seen just "Notification" on the call logs before. https://mke-police.herokuapp.com/?date=2024-03-19

View attachment 188908
Click to expand...
So he's not lying? He was notified of bomb threats in other cities in his name. Odd. How are the police so quickly sure the threats are bogus? Sounds like he may be unaware of the genesis of the calls. Is he currently housing guests? If so is this a ploy to show he gets "swatted" even when guests are in his home? Confusing...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top