• Recently, onaforums has taken to opening a substack. You can subscribe to this substack to get email notifications when the site is down, gets a new domain name, or is otherwise running into trouble. We are not accepting donations at this time, so please skip the part where it asks if you would like to contribute. Subscribe at onaforums.substack.com

  • Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators. If you want your account deleted, send a private message to @BlackTransLivesMatter

    Do not post IRL pranks here without including the source

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

Washington Post interviews Pat, he oinks a lot

G

guest

Guest
Couple of bullet points in no particular order;

Pat doesn't work at Hoolies- he types at their bar

Pat's windows were not looked in.

Pat's conduct is not discussed

No proof is offered for any of this, nor is there any mention that he "alleges" all of this, none of it is proves

The two dissenting justices were right wingers and the the author of the opinion is a lefty

Lastly he claims "internet experts" like himself should be writing law on issues of freedom of expression and also ruling on it, because people who don't use the internet to seek fame by displaying their whole lives can't use their JD to appropriately limit freedom of expression so failures with an internet addiction can be able to say what they want free from reply. Meanwhile he supports this notion by saying that internet virgins are no longer existent but somehow claims, that they are and judge these cases. Very bad logic there.

In summary I want to see Pat's head caved in by somebody he gets obnoxious with online. Our razzing is not sufficient for his behavior. The. best part is I was "doxxed" according to Hildy and nothing happened? Why is that? What separates a mush-mouthed, fat, dago, boomer, who has strong opinions from a fruity, fat, millennial, who has strong opinions? Maybe it's his lack of work ethic, sense of entitlement, hubris, threats of violence, failed morals, and so much more.

Die fat about it, Pat.
 
gassers

gassers

CakeHorn/Say "Cookie"/BonnieMcFarlaneMe2 Alt
‎
‎
Forum Clout
14,931
covidcumia said:
Couple of bullet points in no particular order;

Pat doesn't work at Hoolies- he types at their bar

Pat's windows were not looked in.

Pat's conduct is not discussed

No proof is offered for any of this, nor is there any mention that he "alleges" all of this, none of it is proves

The two dissenting justices were right wingers and the the author of the opinion is a lefty

Lastly he claims "internet experts" like himself should be writing law on issues of freedom of expression and also ruling on it, because people who don't use the internet to seek fame by displaying their whole lives can't use their JD to appropriately limit freedom of expression so failures with an internet addiction can be able to say what they want free from reply. Meanwhile he supports this notion by saying that internet virgins are no longer existent but somehow claims, that they are and judge these cases. Very bad logic there.

In summary I want to see Pat's head caved in by somebody he gets obnoxious with online. Our razzing is not sufficient for his behavior. The. best part is I was "doxxed" according to Hildy and nothing happened? Why is that? What separates a mush-mouthed, fat, dago, boomer, who has strong opinions from a fruity, fat, millennial, who has strong opinions? Maybe it's his lack of work ethic, sense of entitlement, hubris, threats of violence, failed morals, and so much more.

Die fat about it, Pat.
Click to expand...
1688058817327.png
 
Brooke Shields

Brooke Shields

forward all complaints to x.com/hackingbutdeadbeat
‎
‎
Forum Clout
77,099
IGotATreeOnMyHouse85 said:
One quick view of this site will prove its not a “Far Right” site but they don’t even know how to define what makes something “Far Right” but just slap it on to make it “bad”

Political wise I think everyone can agree basing your whole identity around politics / political party is pathetic and stupid. We have a whole section making fun of a conservative boomer who believes his retirement fund rests on the value of Trump merchandise.
Click to expand...
1688060178369.png
 
G

guest

Guest
IGotATreeOnMyHouse85 said:
Her post about doesn’t even make sense. “Bated breath?” The ruling was two days ago and we just had a laugh at it and moved on. Also funny the SUPREME COURT just ruled in our favor (like every court case involving this site as gone in our favor) yet she’s still threatening to get us in trouble.

NOBODY IS AFRAID OF YOU, FAT JACKIE!
Click to expand...
Think of it this way, the existent laws are all in our favor for the tweeting and texting, if for some strange reason they change, nothing we've done before that becomes illegal. We just stop. Meanwhile they're threatening us as if this ruling made Pat's case better. Literally she just wanted to brag that WaPo mentioned fatty. It mentioned his debt too lol.
 
G

Guest

Guest
covidcumia said:
Couple of bullet points in no particular order;

Pat doesn't work at Hoolies- he types at their bar

Pat's windows were not looked in.

Pat's conduct is not discussed

No proof is offered for any of this, nor is there any mention that he "alleges" all of this, none of it is proves

The two dissenting justices were right wingers and the the author of the opinion is a lefty

Lastly he claims "internet experts" like himself should be writing law on issues of freedom of expression and also ruling on it, because people who don't use the internet to seek fame by displaying their whole lives can't use their JD to appropriately limit freedom of expression so failures with an internet addiction can be able to say what they want free from reply. Meanwhile he supports this notion by saying that internet virgins are no longer existent but somehow claims, that they are and judge these cases. Very bad logic there.

In summary I want to see Pat's head caved in by somebody he gets obnoxious with online. Our razzing is not sufficient for his behavior. The. best part is I was "doxxed" according to Hildy and nothing happened? Why is that? What separates a mush-mouthed, fat, dago, boomer, who has strong opinions from a fruity, fat, millennial, who has strong opinions? Maybe it's his lack of work ethic, sense of entitlement, hubris, threats of violence, failed morals, and so much more.

Die fat about it, Pat.
Click to expand...

There’s also the concern that you could “kill me with one punch”, as you threatened @NoBacon. Pat would only neutralize me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top