- Forum Clout
- 259,057
Now Jackie wants to jump in and make empty threats
More to come? Fat chance, Hacky.
More to come? Fat chance, Hacky.
-
Recently, onaforums has taken to opening a substack. You can subscribe to this substack to get email notifications when the site is down, gets a new domain name, or is otherwise running into trouble. We are not accepting donations at this time, so please skip the part where it asks if you would like to contribute. Subscribe at onaforums.substack.com
-
Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators. If you want your account deleted, send a private message to @BlackTransLivesMatter
Do not post IRL pranks here without including the source
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
[email protected]
Washington Post interviews Pat, he oinks a lot
- Thread starter IGotATreeOnMyHouse85
- Start date
- Forum Clout
- 77,074
What an insane thing to have happen to you. Really insane, is there another side to Pat's story?
- Forum Clout
- 67,767
The funniest thing about this is how Clarence Thomas & Amy Coney Handmaiden were the two dissenting opinions on the court.
But the liberals being for this and the conservatives being against it doesn't really gel with Patrick's "TRUMP! ALT-RIGHT! FASH!" oinks so let's leave that part out and imply it's the fault of Republicans.
But the liberals being for this and the conservatives being against it doesn't really gel with Patrick's "TRUMP! ALT-RIGHT! FASH!" oinks so let's leave that part out and imply it's the fault of Republicans.
- Forum Clout
- 52,153
Jackie wants our hate so bad. Its too bad that she's boring and unremarkable in every way possible.
- Forum Clout
- 42,775
I heard Judge Boomia Tetley (as doxxed by Jackie) was the one who influenced the supreme court to make this decision. But the real question is, was he funded by Russia?
- Forum Clout
- 259,057
There goes Pat ruining any credibility of the article
- Forum Clout
- 259,057
Her post about doesn’t even make sense. “Bated breath?” The ruling was two days ago and we just had a laugh at it and moved on. Also funny the SUPREME COURT just ruled in our favor (like every court case involving this site as gone in our favor) yet she’s still threatening to get us in trouble.
NOBODY IS AFRAID OF YOU, FAT JACKIE!
- Forum Clout
- 129,101
I'm so tired of being called a far right extremist. They have to drop that narrative eventually.
G
guest
Guest
Or linked the Nadolski tapes [MEDIA=youtube]u3cPAuNsSWg[/MEDIA] On second thought: Sir, don’t do that.
- Forum Clout
- 91,850
How is that ruling bad for this place? I know that everything here is found on reddit, but the ruling gives us an extra layer of protection.
Hey Jackie, we're celebrating this event, you dumb fat whore. Pat being mentioned in a stupid WaPo news article is meaningless, we've gained from this.
G
guest
Guest
Maybe it’s better they don’t considering that the bovine actually bested the Redditards in court, big hot tamale beefers aside.
G
guest
Guest
"Far-right" fuck off. I would have voted for Obama a third time if I could!
- Forum Clout
- 39,077
She’s tiptoeing an extremely fine line with calling Dan a stlaker, it’s interesting how they are both too scared to say a name on such a large platform as they know it’s defamatory.
Also, I’m happy to be the token left-leaning Patposter to dispell the far-right narrative whilst Bam and Carol cover the racist/homophobic accusations.
Also, I’m happy to be the token left-leaning Patposter to dispell the far-right narrative whilst Bam and Carol cover the racist/homophobic accusations.
Last edited:
- Forum Clout
- 72,667
I like that she's spinning this as some sort of victory
- Forum Clout
- 52,228
“It’s not an option to just not exist online,” he said, adding that there really is no meaningful distinction between one’s online presence and real life. “Anybody who still thinks that distinction exists is … divorced from the experiences of hundreds of millions of people.”
Patrick and his ilk are clearly insane. He admittedly acknowledges that there is no difference between people's online personas and their reality. He's one crazy motherfucker.
And yeah, it is possible to not exist online. It's a choice that no one is forcing on you-- especially in Patrick's case.
Patrick and his ilk are clearly insane. He admittedly acknowledges that there is no difference between people's online personas and their reality. He's one crazy motherfucker.
And yeah, it is possible to not exist online. It's a choice that no one is forcing on you-- especially in Patrick's case.
- Forum Clout
- 259,057
One quick view of this site will prove its not a “Far Right” site but they don’t even know how to define what makes something “Far Right” but just slap it on to make it “bad”
Political wise I think everyone can agree basing your whole identity around politics / political party is pathetic and stupid. We have a whole section making fun of a conservative boomer who believes his retirement fund rests on the value of Trump merchandise.
G
guest
Guest
90% of the Democrat members of the US Congress and senate would be considered very right-wing in most European countries, especially when it comes to foreign policy. If you're a centrist in Europe (as most people are) you're practically a commie by American standards. These idiots think making off-colour jokes online and laughing at a once-in-a-generation fat fool as he keeps stepping on rakes qualifies you as a member of the KKK. Of course, they actually don't. They're just pearl-clutching drama queens.
- Forum Clout
- 259,057
Typical Hacky, had nothing to do with anything and tries to spin it as “you’re in BIG trouble now, ONA! The knock is coming!” When we’ve had multiple judges rule in our favor and this site is breaking zero laws.
