Unmined gems in Pat's motion

[More Worser]

A+ rib-buster
View attachment 145535

HO LEE SHIIIITTTTT

" Furthermore, a cornerstone of due process rights is the right to confront your accuser."

Hahahahahahaha
Yes, if you are being tried in a court of law (but not in a tribunal, a university hearing, an HR meeting, etc.) for CRIMINAL charges brought against you on the basis of an accusation, you *may* have the right to confront your accuser.

YOU, Fat, are the one who made the accusations and it was in a CIVIL action, not a criminal one. NO ONE IN THIS HEARING WAS ACCUSING YOU OF ANYTHING.
NO ONE IN THE FAILED CIVIL ACTION WAS ACCUSING YOU OF ANYTHING.

My head is spinning I'm laughing so hard,
But there's more!

"If it is a close question of law as to whether an unrepresented party is entitled to an appointed lawyer in this type of proceeding,"

It's not a close question of law in this type of proceeding, Pat, because this is a CIVIL case. I know you think you know everything because your jewish TV showed you a bunch of lame shows and movies, but "If you cannot afford one, one will be appointed for you" is only for CRIMINAL defendants.

My fawkin riiiiiiiibs

 

[peckafacce]

I'm accusing him of being fat

 

[More Worser]

I'm accusing him of being fat

Criminally fat

 

[CompoundBasement]

 

[More Worser]

"torment litigants"

Aaahahahahaha

The pig squeals out as he strikes you

 

[guest]

He claimed that Miller&Miller, whom he hired days after skipping the debtor's exam, recommended that he skip it - which would be malpractice at the highest levels. So not only did this poor guy get stiffed, he was later accused of malpractice. Patrick then glossed over the non- fulfillment of the amortization of debts, giving no explanation for why he filed it only to not pay, then criticized Quasi for not setting up a new... something... (Debtor's exam I guess) that would be to Patrick's liking and specifications. This is despite not once contacting Quasi or his attorney, and ghosting all parties involved including his own attorney's.

 

[RobertMewler]

He claimed that Miller&Miller, whom he hired days after skipping the debtor's exam, recommended that he skip it - which would be malpractice at the highest levels. So not only did this poor guy get stiffed, he was later accused of malpractice. Patrick then glossed over the non- fulfillment of the amortization of debts, giving no explanation for why he filed it only to not pay, then criticized Quasi for not setting up a new... something... (Debtor's exam I guess) that would be to Patrick's liking and specifications. This is despite not once contacting Quasi or his attorney, and ghosting all parties involved including his own attorney's.

I hope no one shares with Miller & Miller what Pat wrote about them. It could bum them out or lead to them asking him to explain himself.

 

[Mitch Weaver]

He claimed that Miller&Miller, whom he hired days after skipping the debtor's exam, recommended that he skip it - which would be malpractice at the highest levels. So not only did this poor guy get stiffed, he was later accused of malpractice. Patrick then glossed over the non- fulfillment of the amortization of debts, giving no explanation for why he filed it only to not pay, then criticized Quasi for not setting up a new... something... (Debtor's exam I guess) that would be to Patrick's liking and specifications. This is despite not once contacting Quasi or his attorney, and ghosting all parties involved including his own attorney's.

Fat fucking cocksucker.

You rolled the dice and as usual you lost, spectacularly as only you can you goddamn rube. But of course it’s never your fault, right?

Pay your debts you cry bully faggot.

 

[Udders]

I love that he included a screencap of a Sosnay parody twitter touting his 'long dick of the law' or whatever it was. What judge would see that and not be in hysterics? This whole document is Pat at his best, and it's endlessly hilarious.

 

[Jims_Maroon_Pants]

How long does he have before he has to fork over the cash?

 

[LockedHDD__Pot]

then criticized Quasi for not setting up a new... something...

he wanted a chance to re-litigate the whole thing, he imagines himself standing there holding court (literally this time) & talking like he did in Josiah *5. he still stupidly thinks he can swing things but the judge will never allow this; it's done & he didn't appeal, anything he says which doesn't regard his payment will be disallowed. stupid pig.

 

[DominusOdium]

Now remember kids, this legal scholar is the one who has a firm grasp on all those felonies that have already ended your life and his brilliant legal theories have sealed your fate thousands of times over as the walls of justice close in.

 

[guest]

How long does he have before he has to fork over the cash?

A week lol

 

[Jims_Maroon_Pants]

A week lol

Hahahahaha

 

[Meownaw]

He watched She Hulk so he knows everything about law, child.

 

[BudDickman]

You know you fucked up when the counter argument to your 27 page motion is simply "this is all irrelevant, please disregard".

 

[SFWA liaison]

"tune out" this is him TRYING to sound formal and professional, what a rube

 

[Chive Turkey]

"tune out" this is him TRYING to sound formal and professional, what a rube

It's hilariously classless. He put in so much pretentious legalese-sounding gibberish but he couldn't help himself from sounding like a dumb teenager through half of the document either. The man's a parody of himself.

 

[Ladynyahh]

I love this new Rick Tomlinson, Esquire character. Is there anything he can't do? He's like an expert on... everything

 

[Slackjawed Cow]

He was actually proud of writing all that. He really thought he made a case for himself. He just forgot it wasnt a debate and all they want to know is how and when he is going to pay.