• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

Understanding Jim's Tranny Marriage: A Scientific Approach

HipTuckerCumia

hard drive full of CP media
Forum Clout
6,575
Both of them are fags and should be stoned to death, how about that?
You see, according to your logic one of them (the closeted gay man) is straight and not gay. You can have whatever opinions you want, but you can't have your dick and eat it too.
"Oh he was fucking kids but he was thinking about adults the whole time, he's not a pedophile!"
That could actually be true sometimes. Doesn't mean fucking kids is any less wrong.
Norton may be """straight""" in his wormy little head but his actions are that he's a gleeful bottom for a viking.
He is an extremely twisted heterosexual gynandromorphophilic autogynephile. Autogynephilia is very is similar or adjacent to some forms of pedophilia.

Abstract

The most salient dimension of men's sexual orientation is gender: attraction to males versus females. A second dimension is sexual maturity: attraction to children versus adults. A less appreciated dimension is location: attraction to other individuals versus the sexual fantasy of being one of those individuals. Men sexually aroused by the idea or fantasy of being the kinds of individuals to whom they are sexually attracted have an erotic-target identity inversion (ETII). We conducted an online survey to investigate the prevalence and phenomenology of ETIIs among 475 men sexually attracted to children. Autopedophilia, or sexual arousal by the idea of being a child, was common. Furthermore, autopedophilic men tended to be sexually aroused by imagining themselves as the kinds of children (with respect to gender and age) to whom they are sexually attracted. Results support the concept of ETIIs and exemplify the simultaneous importance of three dimensions of male sexual orientation.


 

LAZERBEAMZ

Forum Clout
1,978
I really think watching 90 Day Fiance has warped his mind.

After years of being rejected by every opening act comedienne he tried to come on to, he sat down and watched it and thought "that could be me." But he conveniently ignored that all the guys on the show were sad sacks of shit and were being used by the women for green cards. So instead of getting some semi-normal malnourished Filipino girl, he had to find someone who was mentally ill that couldn't call him out for all of his disgusting proclivities.
 
Forum Clout
54,891
Jim is not gay. Gay men are attracted to masculinity. If Jim was gay, he would have married a regular man, not a man pretending to be a woman. Besides, he has a long history of creeping on regular real women. Jim is twisted pornsick heterosexual man whose marriage is 100% tranny fetish based.
I agree. Jimmy is so consumed by his molestation-based sex fetishes that he now lives them 24/7. He secretly wants everyone to know that he takes his/her giant she-cock up his ass, it's part of the thrill for him.
 

RapistWithHIV

With Osteoporosis.
Forum Clout
9,088
You mean V wasn't a good strategy to snag a genuine woman? :image_9247:

kba5n7taaw621.jpg


Pathetic doormat faggot. To think this is what he was doing while he had an astronaut in studio. I'm of the opinion that in spite of the fact that he IS a faggot who likes tranny cock, he still tried & failed to get a genuine woman to be with him. He was trying to create the illusion for a while (see below), but eventually gave up on it around the time he abandoned his egg white Chad transition. All actual women friend zoned & used him to marginally advance their unwarranted careers. Only a pay4play tranny was willing & I cannot wait until Prince Alan divorces him & publicly accuses him of non-binary rape. Jim might finally get that Compound show the truckers have been itching for.

kba5n7taaw621.jpg
 

HipTuckerCumia

hard drive full of CP media
Forum Clout
6,575
Where does this place Anthony? Sue neither looks like a man nor a woman. He looks like a little boy.
While there is some evidence pointing to him being either a closeted gay man or in the same AGP boat with YimYim, I think Gronez_Bambatta is basically right:

Outside the school gates.
But what about his 'unapologetic masculinity'? What about Sue?

Sure, we joke, but Jim's tranny marriage is a healthy reminder: when people repeatedly tell you what they like, believe them. And when the people around them also say the same thing about the person...

Sue, tell us why Cumia invited you over?

US3d0PR.png


Cumia is into very young girls.
 

UnPRePared

For the last time, I am NOT James Arness!
Forum Clout
51,866
This is probably not going to be a popular opinion here, but when has that ever stopped me?

Love who you love, be who you are. I don't fucking care as long as you're not hurting others. That's really it. Don't touch kids, don't push an agenda with the fervor of a Hare Krishna at an 80's airport (I've seen Airplane!), and don't seek violence towards another person. Simple.

BUT...

I will criticize a fetishist. And that's what I think Jimmy really is.

I don't think the cunt is bisexual, even. His thing is remote femininity with a cock, he lusts after it. A transgendered woman with full surgery? He'd run away like he saw a bomb falling from the sky. But you present that lady with a tool that could give him a bloody rogering?

He'd be drooling on that like Joe Rogan surrounded by a room full of bar stools.

That's my issue, purriod. He doesn't want actual love - and as I said, don't hurt anyone, you can love who you love. He just wants to possess a trinket, a doll if you will, in a certain image that meets his twisted inner desire.

If anyone tried to tell me they have deep conversations, I'd laugh in their fucking face.
 

HipTuckerCumia

hard drive full of CP media
Forum Clout
6,575
There are huge political implications in even entertaining the thought that this should be approached from a "scientific" standpoint. The whole western world is obsessed with quantifying things, trying to pin every disordered behavior down to biological reasons, denying free will, etc.
That's stupid.

That immediately disregards the opinions of huge parts of society but they're shrugged off as relics of a bygone era. Or mocked for being stupid, whatever.
Stupid opinions are stupid, stupid.

Now, I'm all in with the basic critique of what could be called 'scienticism' and trying to mold society into a 'scientifically correct' shape. At the same time, I'm not at all in with this kind of jumbled retard populism, and neither should any other thinking brotherman.

For example, during the trannies-in-womens-bathrooms debate one side called them all dangerous perverts and the other side said they are all like real women, so no biggie. Both went with purely emotional diametrically opposing arguments, which is what you want. Which side was correct? The problem is, it's not that in this kind of situation everyone gets it wrong 50% of the time on average, it's much closer to 100%.

If basic tranny science hadn't been completely ignored by both sides, there still would have been a debate (which is good), but it would have been an informed debate (also good) and it would have undoubtedly resulted in better public policies (also good).

The same is true for all political issues. Economic policy, climate change, whatever. Retarded highly moralistic gut feeling politics leads to shit outcomes. You actually want everyone to be as uninformed as possible. That's stupid.
 
G

guest

Guest
That's stupid.


Stupid opinions are stupid, stupid.

Now, I'm all in with the basic critique of what could be called 'scienticism' and trying to mold society into a 'scientifically correct' shape. At the same time, I'm not at all in with this kind of jumbled retard populism, and neither should any other thinking brotherman.

For example, during the trannies-in-womens-bathrooms debate one side called them all dangerous perverts and the other side said they are all like real women, so no biggie. Both went with purely emotional diametrically opposing arguments, which is what you want. Which side was correct? The problem is, it's not that in this kind of situation everyone gets it wrong 50% of the time on average, it's much closer to 100%.

If basic tranny science hadn't been completely ignored by both sides, there still would have been a debate (which is good), but it would have been an informed debate (also good) and it would have undoubtedly resulted in better public policies (also good).

The same is true for all political issues. Economic policy, climate change, whatever. Retarded highly moralistic gut feeling politics leads to shit outcomes. You actually want everyone to be as uninformed as possible. That's stupid.

I don't need a chemical analysis of dog shit to know I shouldn't mix it in with my dinner. If I come across somebody who insists I eat dog shit I'm not going to waste time listening to their story about the possible health benefits of maybe putting just half a turd in there.
 

BrotherMan1488

Forum Clout
8,234
Understanding? The Worms aims to become part of the Woke establishment he still doesn't get it hes like Patrick S Tomlinson with his delusions... HES STILL WHITE, child
 
Top