And the members look hideous.
-
- Mr. Tomlinson's feud started after members of the now-defunct Reddit site r/opieandanthony got his Twitter account suspended, causing him to threaten some bored trolls who never heard of him with a libel lawsuit. The trolls responded predictably.
- Mr. Tomlinson has been instructed many times by friends, family, police, and attorneys to stop engaging with his trolls, and that continuing to provoke them will cause him to be trolled even more. Mr. Tomlinson wilfully ignores this advice
- He would eventually file a defamation suit against 60 anonymous people which was dismissed with Mr. Tomlinson being ordered to pay $34,762.25 for opposing parties' attorney fees.
- He ended up paying $83,736.99 due to his unsuccessful attempts to dodge the court-ordered judgement, for which he faced jail time and contempt charges.
- He also filed 2 frivolous restraining orders against people who had engaged in First Amendment-protected behavior (one for texting him and another for attending his contempt of court hearing), both of which were dismissed.
- Early on in the lawsuit, Mr. Tomlinson vandalized his own motorcycle and submitted a false police report blaming the people he was suing.
- He accidentally sent surveillance video of the alleged vandal (himself) to a troll.
- Mr. Tomlinson has never shown this video footage during any of his media tours, and desperately tries to scrub it from the internet.
- Mr. Tomlinson claims that the surveillance video was initiated by his "motion-activated" camera, which only collects "30 seconds at a time", despite the video being 32 seconds long and beginning several seconds before the "vandal" enters into the frame.
- On 13 April 2023, the individual responsible for calling the fake emergencies (SWATs) to Mr. Tomlinson's house, a SWAT-for-hire dealer named "Torswats", revealed that Mr. Tomlinson ordered the SWATs to his own house because he wanted to get in the news and sue the MPD for money.
- Torswats would repeat these allegations in private chats which were not intended for public view.
- Mr. Tomlinson has gone on multiple news tours since the SWATtings started in order to promote his victimhood brand, utilizing the services of Lenora Claire.
- He also recently sued the MPD for money.
-
Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
[email protected]
The Beatles - gay and bad
- Thread starter Maybe even kiss you
- Start date
G
guest
Guest
People are sheep. Moreso in the past.
This forum suggests otherwise.
I enjoy Wings more sniff
Revolver, St pepper, abbey road and let it will hold up for the rest of time. Everything else is impressive for its time but mediocre at best now.
Anyone who says they're their favorite band is almost as embarrassing as Fat pretending he loves the Foo Fighters, when in reality he only loves himself.
Anyone who says they're their favorite band is almost as embarrassing as Fat pretending he loves the Foo Fighters, when in reality he only loves himself.
I legit hate The Beatles.
"They paved the way for other artists". Because they made their own music, or what? That's a music industry thing that has nothing to do with the music itself. It was still the same type of trivial nonsense as what came before.
Last edited:
The Kinks → The Beatles
Any day of the week.
Any day of the week.
G
guest
Guest
I don't completely hate them musically, but the handful of good songs they had have been done to death. "She's so heavyyyyy" is she? Their whole manufactured rebellious image is gay as shit.
Lennon acting like he's some tortured genius who wants to save the world, while he's just another degenerate sellout junkie crooner with a caterwauling slope for a wife. God bless Mark David Chapman's pinpoint aim.
Lennon acting like he's some tortured genius who wants to save the world, while he's just another degenerate sellout junkie crooner with a caterwauling slope for a wife. God bless Mark David Chapman's pinpoint aim.
Oops, got the first car crash! Hey @RIP-Allen-Lanier, kill yourself for liking that whimsical faggot band.
I'm all in with a bit of (((revisionist))) history but the Beatles are to pop music as Shakespeare is to playwriting.
They changed the way people wrote pop music at such a fundamental level that everything that comes after is indebted to the Beatles to some extent.
People from all across the musical world, including classical composers, appreciate their remarkable gift for melody and genius songwriting.
There was no ulterior motive to manufacture the Beatles and force them upon the public. They were not 'used' by the establishment or aided by the elite class.
In fact, it's remarkable they became famous at all as no-one in the music industry wanted to touch them. It was mostly incredible good fortune that they got a record deal.
They were a legit natural cultural phenomenon that in time, the establishment had to absorb and try to position them as an influence on the social revolution that took place in the 60's.
Most people on this forum will be aware of the role the CIA played in releasing hallucinogenic drugs or the connection between rock stars having family members in the military or the way the (((media))) used pop culture to promote degenerate behaviour.
Yet the Beatle, at least initially, were operating outside of these social changes and were simply the soundtrack to it as it was happening.
Sorry for the autistic response but it's either this or I bake a cake with Patrick Tomlinson's face on it and I'm not that gifted.
They changed the way people wrote pop music at such a fundamental level that everything that comes after is indebted to the Beatles to some extent.
People from all across the musical world, including classical composers, appreciate their remarkable gift for melody and genius songwriting.
There was no ulterior motive to manufacture the Beatles and force them upon the public. They were not 'used' by the establishment or aided by the elite class.
In fact, it's remarkable they became famous at all as no-one in the music industry wanted to touch them. It was mostly incredible good fortune that they got a record deal.
They were a legit natural cultural phenomenon that in time, the establishment had to absorb and try to position them as an influence on the social revolution that took place in the 60's.
Most people on this forum will be aware of the role the CIA played in releasing hallucinogenic drugs or the connection between rock stars having family members in the military or the way the (((media))) used pop culture to promote degenerate behaviour.
Yet the Beatle, at least initially, were operating outside of these social changes and were simply the soundtrack to it as it was happening.
Sorry for the autistic response but it's either this or I bake a cake with Patrick Tomlinson's face on it and I'm not that gifted.
Beatles hate is gay. The sheer amount of songwriting that was cranked out by 2 guys in a 7 year span is immaculate.
Abbey Road B-side medley is the greatest 16 minutes of music ever created by man in one sitting. I could geek the fawk out right now.
Abbey Road B-side medley is the greatest 16 minutes of music ever created by man in one sitting. I could geek the fawk out right now.
Before the Beatles music was pretty shitty. They were only 12 years removed from the 40s sound when they brought out their early stuff like Love me do which imo is still a catchy pop song. By they time they burnt out at the end of the 60s everything changed. The speed they changed was incredible. I guess giving up touring as it couldn't really be done in big numbers back then helped them with that but bands today would tour two hit albums in the time the Beatles did their whole career and be happy with it
I keep hearing this but I don't see what people are talking about. What was different about their music compared to Elvis Presley's music?
I’m as big a Beatles fan as any but that statement is trash, brothaman. We had Elvis, Little Richard, Buddy Holly, Sinatra. Granted the Beatles did push shit forward in part because they had George Martin to help facilitate on the technical side, but music was pretty fawkin good in the 50’s.
Elvis’ sun sessions rivals anything the Beatles ever put out, shit still slaps, child.
Its fashionable for music fags (me) to hate on The Beatles, but the fact remains that they're the most important and influential group of the 20th century. Personally, I can take em or leave em. Abbey Road is good, The White Album has its moments, Revolver and Rubber Soul are pretty flawless, but I despise Sgt. Pepper. Anyway, that's my gayass opinion.
Oh yeah, Taxman is a banger. Post-punk before Punk.
And without the Beatles (Apple Records) we may have never gotten this stone cold masterpiece.
Oh yeah, Taxman is a banger. Post-punk before Punk.
And without the Beatles (Apple Records) we may have never gotten this stone cold masterpiece.
This country music fan respectfully disagrees.
Elvis is the only one that has truly lasted. Buddy Holly stinks. Sinatra stinks.