- Forum Clout
- 76,379
I want to give Leslie's asshole head.
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
I want to give Leslie's asshole head.
Also note she was tweeted about how her work was possibly responsible less than 5 minutes after Pat tweeted it. Also there was a time she tweeted about him getting swatted BEFORE Pat tweeted about it.I wonder if Jackie is the one calling in the SWATtings and not Pat.
Lets say the first 30 or so were real and deranged Kiwifags or other Pat obsessed haters. Now you have a perfect alibi so that any future ones can be blamed on the 30 real ones from before
We know the SWATtings ramped up shortly after Jackie came into contact with Pat. We see here that Jackie inserting herself into Pats story provides her with a career and content to further herself with.
Sure, originally we thought the SWATtings were for media attention and a lawsuit. It makes sense. But the net negatives of it sort of outweigh that. If Pat is to be believed, when these calls are made he’s afraid for his life. No one believes the story he tells of cyberstalkers terrorizing him. The lawsuit against the MPD and media tour didn’t pan out. So what would Pat have to gain from doing this other than getting to post another “They swatted me” tweet? He can do a lot less for pity likes.
But as explained before, it is almost a net positive for Jackie. She’s not the one getting SWATted. Pat will always be the main person on Litcrit so she’ll never seriously be “harassed”. And each new SWATting that happens she can parlay into new tweets or a speaking session.
Does anybody have a date on Jackie's first appearance or mention and how close it was to the swattings? They felt really close.I wonder if Jackie is the one calling in the SWATtings and not Pat.
Lets say the first 30 or so were real and deranged Kiwifags or other Pat obsessed haters. Now you have a perfect alibi so that any future ones can be blamed on the 30 real ones from before
We know the SWATtings ramped up shortly after Jackie came into contact with Pat. We see here that Jackie inserting herself into Pats story provides her with a career and content to further herself with.
Sure, originally we thought the SWATtings were for media attention and a lawsuit. It makes sense. But the net negatives of it sort of outweigh that. If Pat is to be believed, when these calls are made he’s afraid for his life. No one believes the story he tells of cyberstalkers terrorizing him. The lawsuit against the MPD and media tour didn’t pan out. So what would Pat have to gain from doing this other than getting to post another “They swatted me” tweet? He can do a lot less for pity likes.
But as explained before, it is almost a net positive for Jackie. She’s not the one getting SWATted. Pat will always be the main person on Litcrit so she’ll never seriously be “harassed”. And each new SWATting that happens she can parlay into new tweets or a speaking session.
Leslie is a nice lady!
But they threw pepperoni on his duplex! Look it up while never returning!The only proper ending for this saga is Pat getting arrested,
She thinks his story and her being involved will get her some kind of fame - she doesn’t give a shit about him and don’t forget she once tweeted about Pat getting swatted before he did. It was less than 5 minutes after Pat told people he was swatted she was claiming it was because of “her work” which was her dumb keynote speech barely anybody watched over than us to laugh at her.Jackie has the means. While she falsely believes she’s some genius hacker, she has some knowledge and skill and would be able to pull it off.
She has the motive. Several actually. Fame, relationship with pat, food.
She has the opportunity. What else that fat bitch gon’ do with her day
Case closed. Checkmate atheists
Thank the Lord that there’s people like this broad Eileen for bringing attention to this!
I see where Jackie's coming from.
Can someone tell me why Turk is treated separately and doesn’t get prisoned?Pat is totally looking for attention.
An unprovoked response to a porsalin post that he wasnt even tagged in. This is how pat "markets" himself and tries to drum up reasons to lash out.
View attachment 167035
Are her teeth staying in, or not?would anyone fuck Eileen for a bit?
Jackie is the kid who throws the ball onto the roof when playing with you, then runs to tell the teacher you did it.Jackie is a far more efficient manipulator. Pat uses his tantrums to wear people down to get his way and that doesnt work too well as an adult male as it did for him as a child.
They also call me an associate, not a member. "The people you associate with"Can someone tell me why Turk is treated separately and doesn’t get prisoned?
No no, I meant you. I just replied to the Porsalin tweet because it reminded me that like Porsalin he doesn’t prison you.They also call me an associate, not a member. "The people you associate with"
I think it's because I do say in the videos that this place is a fucking cess pit of alcoholism and untreated schizophrenia. I think I described it as "a hill of autistic fire ants a junkie accidentally dropped a bag of meth in to" so I think they assume I'm an outsider.
edit : I just realized you meant Porsalin. I am not now, nor have I ever been Porsalin. This is a malicious rumor started in group chats.
Also, I assume we grossly underestimate how much information, and lore sharing Pat, Jackie, HiFi, Stewartson, Hildy, Weimer, etc. all do. For example, HiFi knew I had spent time in an addictions treatment facility, which he either got here, or, I suspect from Jackie's time here, because that's when that would have been a story line. I'm guessing they have some kind of boomer version of discord set up. If they do, they'll have rules for different people, depending on what their goals are with them.No no, I meant you. I just replied to the Porsalin tweet because it reminded me that like Porsalin he doesn’t prison you.
This forum is dedicated exclusively to parody, comedy, and satirical content. None of the statements, opinions, or depictions shared on this platform should be considered or treated as factual information under any circumstances. All content is intended for entertainment purposes only and should be regarded as fictional, exaggerated, or purely the result of personal opinions and creative expression.
Please be aware that this forum may feature discussions and content related to taboo, controversial, or potentially offensive subjects. The purpose of this content is not to incite harm but to engage in satire and explore the boundaries of humor. If you are sensitive to such subjects or are easily offended, we kindly advise that you leave the forum.
Any similarities to real people, events, or situations are either coincidental or based on real-life inspirations but used within the context of fair use satire. By accepting this disclaimer, you acknowledge and understand that the content found within this forum is strictly meant for parody, satire, and entertainment. You agree not to hold the forum, its administrators, moderators, or users responsible for any content that may be perceived as offensive or inappropriate. You enter and participate in this forum at your own risk, with full awareness that everything on this platform is purely comedic, satirical, or opinion-based, and should never be taken as factual information.
If any information or discussion on this platform triggers distressing emotions or thoughts, please leave immediately and consider seeking assistance.
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (USA): Phone: 1-800-273-TALK (1-800-273-8255) Website: https://suicidepreventionlifeline.org/