StutJo Cracks Under Questioning From VTM (w/ Adam Busch)

[Cruisin’ Joe Cumia]

Lol what?

Answer the question. Is it worse to deface the funeral page of elderly family members of those in the dabbleverse (not John, the faggots shitting on him)…Or is it worse to be a non offending pedophile?

 

[RoTheHo69]

Is it worse to deface the funeral page of elderly family members

Wait..Somebody stole our bit??

@Dabbler that's it. now get the fuck out.

 

[Jims_Maroon_Pants]

I am unfortunately not a bit. I you thought guys might enjoy this type of content. I mean both Anthony Cumia and Jim Norton are guests sometimes and always great, I thought maybe Opie and Anthony fans would enjoy a podcast that spawned from Jocktober (which I'm not that familiar with, I'm a Howard Stern fan, mostly) and that featured two of its hosts on occasion. I guess I was totally wrong. I assumed once they let me post in main forums that everyone would embrace watp. I guess not though looking at all the comments.

I listen to WATP but I know the fellas here wouldn't take kindly to it so I don't bring it up often

 

[Jims_Maroon_Pants]

It doesn't help that Karl is an Anthony and Missy ball washer too

 

[aRTie02150]

Did anyone else pause the video immediately after .5 seconds because the guy sounds fucking annoying?

 

[DMbA]

Did anyone else pause the video immediately after .5 seconds because the guy sounds fucking annoying?

That's Karl the Hebebeger, he used to spam the old sub with his show

 

[aRTie02150]

That's Karl the Hebebeger, he used to spam the old sub with his show

Well obviously he did a poor job because I've been here for years and have never heard of the faggot.

Fucking hack radio voice.

 

[DMbA]

Well obviously he did a poor job because I've been here for years and have never heard of the faggot.

Fucking hack radio voice.

His big break was hooking up with compound media era cumia I guess

 

[fusciasomething]

Dan bringing people like this here is worse than when he brought torswats in

 

[BoqsDiaperHat]

I am unfortunately not a bit. I you thought guys might enjoy this type of content. I mean both Anthony Cumia and Jim Norton are guests sometimes and always great, I thought maybe Opie and Anthony fans would enjoy a podcast that spawned from Jocktober (which I'm not that familiar with, I'm a Howard Stern fan, mostly) and that featured two of its hosts on occasion. I guess I was totally wrong. I assumed once they let me post in main forums that everyone would embrace watp. I guess not though looking at all the comments.

The dabbleverse is for faggots and WATP is for pedophiles.

 

[BoqsDiaperHat]

is his Kiwi Farms thread on the first page page of "lolcows"?

EDIT: btw- not only is stuttering john not relevant in the general lolcow sektur (not to be confused with Da Sektur), he's not even relevant in the dabbleverse

Kiwi farms faggots only care about trannys because they are queers.

 

[Dabbler]

Answer the question. Is it worse to deface the funeral page of elderly family members of those in the dabbleverse (not John, the faggots shitting on him)…Or is it worse to be a non offending pedophile?

I don't get what you're saying. Non offending pedophile? I dont think pedophiles are good, and I don't think trolling a funeral page is either. What kind of question is that?

 

[fusciasomething]

What kind of question is that?

 

[Cruisin’ Joe Cumia]

I don't get what you're saying. Non offending pedophile? I dont think pedophiles are good, and I don't think trolling a funeral page is either. What kind of question is that?

Man it’s not that difficult.

Let’s say that wrinkly old kike Deb had a dead mother with a funeral page. Let’s say someone made an account named “Dan Mullen” and posted about how Joe Cumia enjoyed drinking child saliva or some such thing.

Would that be worse than a pedophile who was not known to have committed crimes against children?

In other words, does the non offending pedophile get any credit for not offending (or at least not being discovered yet?)

Maybe you have to be a Mensa member to tackle this problem…I don’t know. I just keep my radio tuned to the virus and my eyes on the open roads

 

[Dabbler]

Man it’s not that difficult.

Let’s say that wrinkly old kike Deb had a dead mother with a funeral page. Let’s say someone made an account named “Dan Mullen” and posted about how Joe Cumia enjoyed drinking child saliva or some such thing.

Would that be worse than a pedophile who was not known to have committed crimes against children?

In other words, does the non offending pedophile get any credit for not offending (or at least not being discovered yet?)

Maybe you have to be a Mensa member to tackle this problem…I don’t know. I just keep my radio tuned to the virus and my eyes on the open roads

Absolutely the pedophile gets credit. In that case I think the pedophile not acting on his urges is way better than the troll in this example. Like a lot better. The pedophile is doing no harm but the troll definitely is. Why are you asking me this?

 

[Cruisin’ Joe Cumia]

Absolutely the pedophile gets credit. In that case I think the pedophile not acting on his urges is way better than the troll in this example. Like a lot better. The pedophile is doing no harm but the troll definitely is. Why are you asking me this?

Ok this is a good bit. Posting retarded unfunny bits from the dabble faggots to irritate people is pfg

I approve.

 

[Niggerotchi]

Absolutely the pedophile gets credit. In that case I think the pedophile not acting on his urges is way better than the troll in this example. Like a lot better. The pedophile is doing no harm but the troll definitely is. Why are you asking me this?

Jill yourself pedophile