- Forum Clout
- 7,946
I won't name him here (I'm pretty sure I know, not 100%) , but all the big time tweeters have an admirer that poses as them in texts and tweets and Rick falls for it over and over. Keep in mind he has several people he's named so those misdirected tweets go in his folders for Dan, Bernard, Gibney, and Robert. I also think he uses the nicknames of Kyle, Honey Badger, and others and has the sending parties all confused, so great evidence gathering, pig.There's a couple things here:
If H.B. Piggypacker walked into MPD and handed them a dossier of his printed out tweets, they'd take it only to put in the men's bathroom with the rest of their Juggs magazines.
Also, I've said this before, but one reason Toad believes there's only 6 of us is because some of the regular fatposters both past and present worked together on so many group bits that they absorbed some of eachother's idiosyncrasies in cadence and diction. The "Dan is free, Robert is free, Andrew..." etc. could've been sent by a list of suspects who use that phrasing. Toad thinks HB, Bud Dickman, myself, and probably a handful of others are all the same person. That would mean this hypothetical Superposter was on twitter 36 hours a day running 25 accounts simultaneously. It's insane to believe that. But Toad has bragged publicly several times that he can pick up on "subTle tells" we each have and has thus deduced there's only 5-6 of us in total. Remember, he wasn't good at Problem Solving.
Finally, someone please shop a badger head on this for HB's new twitter character.
View attachment 183176
Best part is that nowhere does it say reviewing media requires a purchase or even completing said media to the end. I can look at a cover and say a book is shit, unlike saying a restaurant sucks based on what others say. I could review a food place as being filthy or crowded and not have eaten there. I can't say their lasagna tastes like shit though, but I could say it looks like it. He's very stupid.people turn themselves in when there's a warrant or an open investigation. You know, like the warrant that would have been issued for you being in contempt of court before the retard handlers had to step in at the final hour.
The only open investigation is into the torswats guy. People don't randomly wander into police stations in different states or countries and say, "some obese man on the internet said i'm going to prison forever, i don't know what I'm turning myself in for".
This is the kind of jurisprudence we can expect from the brilliant legal mind who brought us such arguments as, "we need to delay the hearing so that quasi can identify himself because we just recently confirmed his identity", and "if quasi doesn't conclusively prove he purchased a book to give a review online his constitutional rights should be violated"