Not sure what you mean. Can't a judge hold people in contempt (aka put them in jail) for almost anything? Granted, I'm sure it won't look good if it goes to appellate courtYeah that contempt charge isn't going to hold up, what a dumb judge.
You are a stupid zoomer retard, please shut up.Uh oh contrarian (nuanced) view incoming
The judge has every right to question a lawyer on how they obtained that information. Yes, according to what Thugs lawyer cited, the private meeting was probably unlawful. HOWEVER, as the judge says, if it IS unlawful an appellate court can work that out…OR you could just say where you got the information (but the reason you won’t is because you’re doing some really unethical shit that could get you hit by the bar.)
Dudes an actual idiot because there were presumably ways to work this out and potentially get this case overturned without getting arrested. From what i’ve seen of it despite being a RICO charge against a literal gang the prosecution has been fucking up and making terrible arguments and the judge has “been on the defenses side” for a while.
I feel like you’ve said you have a construction job. If true I can imagine you in the portable shit posting after men tell you that you’re a fag.Uh oh contrarian (nuanced) view incoming
The judge has every right to question a lawyer on how they obtained that information. Yes, according to what Thugs lawyer cited, the private meeting was probably unlawful. HOWEVER, as the judge says, if it IS unlawful an appellate court can work that out…OR you could just say where you got the information (but the reason you won’t is because you’re doing some really unethical shit that could get you hit by the bar.)
Dudes an actual idiot because there were presumably ways to work this out and potentially get this case overturned without getting arrested. From what i’ve seen of it despite being a RICO charge against a literal gang the prosecution has been fucking up and making terrible arguments and the judge has “been on the defenses side” for a while.
Hey Mr sue can you approve my 60 hours of overtime! ThanksI feel like you’ve said you have a construction job. If true I can imagine you in the portable shit posting after men tell you that you’re a fag.
I would never use a portable.I feel like you’ve said you have a construction job. If true I can imagine you in the portable shit posting after men tell you that you’re a fag.
I meant the shitty office that they randomly place at a job site.I would never use a portable.
Look, but don't touch!We’re in the thread for a stupid autotune rapper. This is exactly where I belong.
Thats what I meant, sorry. Am retarded. He's going to appeal it and get the judge in some shit.Not sure what you mean. Can't a judge hold people in contempt (aka put them in jail) for almost anything? Granted, I'm sure it won't look good if it goes to appellate court
Please post nigger surgeon rapafter this thread and the other about a nigger surgeon rapping while cutting people open, can we just nuke atlanta
what a zoo
![]()
In a just world the judge would have to answer for why he broke the law first but then we are where we are and I am retardedUh oh contrarian (nuanced) view incoming
The judge has every right to question a lawyer on how they obtained that information. Yes, according to what Thugs lawyer cited, the private meeting was probably unlawful. HOWEVER, as the judge says, if it IS unlawful an appellate court can work that out…OR you could just say where you got the information (but the reason you won’t is because you’re doing some really unethical shit that could get you hit by the bar.)
Dudes an actual idiot because there were presumably ways to work this out and potentially get this case overturned without getting arrested. From what i’ve seen of it despite being a RICO charge against a literal gang the prosecution has been fucking up and making terrible arguments and the judge has “been on the defenses side” for a while.
Man, that attorney is going to make so much money for not tattling on his source. Gtfo if you think he fucked upUh oh contrarian (nuanced) view incoming
The judge has every right to question a lawyer on how they obtained that information. Yes, according to what Thugs lawyer cited, the private meeting was probably unlawful. HOWEVER, as the judge says, if it IS unlawful an appellate court can work that out…OR you could just say where you got the information (but the reason you won’t is because you’re doing some really unethical shit that could get you hit by the bar.)
Dudes an actual idiot because there were presumably ways to work this out and potentially get this case overturned without getting arrested.