- Forum Clout
- 18,857
I wonder how much of all of the memory in the world is wasted by sub 320k audio content being converted to bigger formats for no reason. I used to routinely convert thousands of mp3 loops and samples to wav just to get rid of the id3 tags because 35kb vs 350kb didnt feel like it mattered much, even on a small hard drive. It's probably not even a negligible amount in the grand scheme of things. Video has to be even worse.No, it gets a lot more complicated than that, but 64kbps MP3s tend to just be CD rips that have had their quality reduced greatly to fit on MP3 players from 2001 that held like 32mb total. CDs themselves have a much higher bitrate and sound fine. So did cassettes, for that matter. That miniscule blip of time when MP3 players sucked ass was the only reason anyone needed to have dogshit quality music since the advent of vinyl records.
That being said, MP3s ripped directly from CDs at top quality, come out sounding great, and their filesizes are miniscule by today's standards. So there's no reason to actually listen directly from your CD collection when you can rip all of it onto a cheap hard drive, or shit, even a $20 SD card by now.
It's all smoke and mirrors anyway. Youtube audio maxes out at 128k unless you pay for premium and 99% of the users aren't listening in an environment where they would even notice enough to care.