- Forum Clout
- 258,179
But he was not aware, now we gotta see what BS they ran with
Recently, onaforums has taken to opening a substack. You can subscribe to this substack to get email notifications when the site is down, gets a new domain name, or is otherwise running into trouble. We are not accepting donations at this time, so please skip the part where it asks if you would like to contribute. Subscribe at onaforums.substack.com
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
They just replayed the NBC Nightly News segment. It's not any new content other than maybe Mika making some dumb comment about the story.Would kill my ribs if it was a story about a pig.
MSNBC doing retractions? When pigs fly!I can’t wait until they have to do retractions once it’s discovered Pat was paying someone to call in the swats so he could sue the city and get famous.
Pat tends to drive to conventions, actually.MSNBC doing retractions? When pigs fly!
Deranged pigThis shit is getting ridiculous. Even if you believed every word that falls out of his fat mouth his story still makes no goddamn sense. How has nobody asked him the obvious questions? Swatters do it to get a reaction. Is giving him this reaction on a national level a good idea?
"Oh no.. it's much worse than that. My stlakers want the police to shoot me."
Then why are you showing us video of you screaming threats at them and throwing limp wristed punches?
That's not the behavior of somebody who is afraid of getting shot.
The whole story makes no sense at all. One tweet 5 years ago....
It's annoying right now but these public lies are just rakes waiting to be stomped on
That’s what’s so disgusting about this “media” tour where it’s all blamed on judges being stupid when we’re talking about respected judges who know the law. The one CA judge said something like “I don’t like what they’re saying but it’s not against the law to say it” which explains why he lost.No one ever explains how it is a technicality or misapplication. Because it's not. They just want the laws to change, not that's a judge is misinterpreting it. the changes they want fundamentally break free speech.
This forum is dedicated exclusively to parody, comedy, and satirical content. None of the statements, opinions, or depictions shared on this platform should be considered or treated as factual information under any circumstances. All content is intended for entertainment purposes only and should be regarded as fictional, exaggerated, or purely the result of personal opinions and creative expression.
Please be aware that this forum may feature discussions and content related to taboo, controversial, or potentially offensive subjects. The purpose of this content is not to incite harm but to engage in satire and explore the boundaries of humor. If you are sensitive to such subjects or are easily offended, we kindly advise that you leave the forum.
Any similarities to real people, events, or situations are either coincidental or based on real-life inspirations but used within the context of fair use satire. By accepting this disclaimer, you acknowledge and understand that the content found within this forum is strictly meant for parody, satire, and entertainment. You agree not to hold the forum, its administrators, moderators, or users responsible for any content that may be perceived as offensive or inappropriate. You enter and participate in this forum at your own risk, with full awareness that everything on this platform is purely comedic, satirical, or opinion-based, and should never be taken as factual information.
If any information or discussion on this platform triggers distressing emotions or thoughts, please leave immediately and consider seeking assistance.
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (USA): Phone: 1-800-273-TALK (1-800-273-8255) Website: https://suicidepreventionlifeline.org/