- Forum Clout
- 98,708
hahahaha damn Dan we got a new head podcaster
this what he looks like:
this what he looks like:
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
hahahaha damn Dan we got a new head podcaster
View attachment 80343
this what he looks like:
View attachment 80344
He looks like he sits down to pee. Pretty incisive regarding the pig, though.hahahaha damn Dan we got a new head podcaster
View attachment 80343
this what he looks like:
View attachment 80344
He's puttin' up da numbahsHe looks like he sits down to pee.
He ain't gotta do my man Rick like that
Someone should start a "Felony Crime Podcast" covering Pat's antics. What could go wrong?He should do a gang stalking episode. Nevermind, it says true crime.
he admitted it
View attachment 80348
Welp, I guess the nazis now own twitter because I can't post cartoons of girls that appear to be kids about to get fucked by animals anymoreIf he gets suspended for CP that'd be a fitting end to his twitter.
Well Twitter hid the meme as sensitive material so clearly twitter thinks its sketchy. Not just some rando calling pat out.How is it possibly any worse to infer something pedo-ish or creepy from ANYTHING, than to be the one posting that stuff under the guise of it being "normal"?
I attended a very left wing university class (redundant). The tutor was a gay guy. As an example of what is not considered appropriate in media, he presented a perfume advertisement featuring Dakota Fanning at age 15-16 in a very provocatively dressed and posed manner. Apparently, there was an outcry at the time because it considered vulgar, inappropriate, and had pedo overtones. The point being, things don't have to be hardcore CP before it's considered WRONG, some things are kind of wrong before they go too far.
Pat's logic works like this:
"Hey, you can't groom a child! I'll fucking kill you!"
"This isn't grooming, and if it were, those are your projections. If you try to kill me, you're just a Nazi who is really a pedophile."
It's a good sign. YouTube has a good model which virtually prohibits nudity and pornography which distinguishes it from the rest of the internet. Twitter could block the US President's account, but won't ban people for posting porn or anything questionable. How did that ever make sense?Well Twitter hid the meme as sensitive material so clearly twitter thinks its sketchy. Not just some rando calling pat out.
I read this in Boomia's voiceHow is it possibly any worse to infer something pedo-ish or creepy from ANYTHING, than to be the one posting that stuff under the guise of it being "normal"?
I attended a very left wing university class (redundant). The tutor was a gay guy. As an example of what is not considered appropriate in media, he presented a perfume advertisement featuring Dakota Fanning at age 15-16 in a very provocatively dressed and posed manner. Apparently, there was an outcry at the time because it considered vulgar, inappropriate, and had pedo overtones. The point being, things don't have to be hardcore CP before it's considered WRONG, some things are kind of wrong before they go too far.
Pat's logic works like this:
"Hey, you can't groom a child! I'll fucking kill you!"
"This isn't grooming, and if it were, those are your projections. If you try to kill me, you're just a Nazi who is really a pedophile."
This forum is dedicated exclusively to parody, comedy, and satirical content. None of the statements, opinions, or depictions shared on this platform should be considered or treated as factual information under any circumstances. All content is intended for entertainment purposes only and should be regarded as fictional, exaggerated, or purely the result of personal opinions and creative expression.
Please be aware that this forum may feature discussions and content related to taboo, controversial, or potentially offensive subjects. The purpose of this content is not to incite harm but to engage in satire and explore the boundaries of humor. If you are sensitive to such subjects or are easily offended, we kindly advise that you leave the forum.
Any similarities to real people, events, or situations are either coincidental or based on real-life inspirations but used within the context of fair use satire. By accepting this disclaimer, you acknowledge and understand that the content found within this forum is strictly meant for parody, satire, and entertainment. You agree not to hold the forum, its administrators, moderators, or users responsible for any content that may be perceived as offensive or inappropriate. You enter and participate in this forum at your own risk, with full awareness that everything on this platform is purely comedic, satirical, or opinion-based, and should never be taken as factual information.
If any information or discussion on this platform triggers distressing emotions or thoughts, please leave immediately and consider seeking assistance.
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (USA): Phone: 1-800-273-TALK (1-800-273-8255) Website: https://suicidepreventionlifeline.org/