• New rule: Do not post IRL pranks here without including the source

    Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators. If you want your account deleted, send a private message to @BlackTransLivesMatter

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

On this day 21 YEARS AGO an INNOCENT MAN was CONVICTED OF MURDER for GOING FISHING.

Suetonius

LAUGH.
Forum Clout
124,272
I take hard evidence over Nancy Grace he ordered PPV porn! Gone Girl type "evidence". Everything in the Scott Peterson case is Gone Girl evidence. He was cold at the trial! He was cheating on her!

There was a ton of hard evidence OJ was guilty, he was lucky enough to do it in the right place (LA a couple years after Rodney King) at the right time (when you could still call DNA evidence witchcraft voodoo the white man is manipulating).
I don’t know if you’re playing a bit but how do you feel about the day Scott was found he had dyed his hair, was carrying two ID’s, a passport, a shit ton of cash, changes of clothes, 4 cell phones, etc etc?


My OP was ironic because there really is so much shit that makes him look guilty - and sometimes thats really all you need. He’s an avid golfer but on the one day his wife goes missing he goes fishing…and tells all his friends later that he went golfing. The DNA found on the pliers. Scott said he left home at around 9:30 and the dog wasn’t found until 10:14-10:30, essentially giving Laci an hour to independently disappear or for Scott to murder her. You have the spot the investigators didn’t check in the warehouse because “the power was out”, even though Scott claimed to have been sending emails from there the same day. You have the entire affair and the fact he told his mistress that his wife was missing a month before it actually happened. You have his constant lying and smug asshole face saying he told Laci of the affair before she went missing, or that he told his mistress he had a wife from the start. Or that his families bodys wash up at the same place he went fishing (albeit months later.)

20 years and not a single appeal that was worthwhile. Guys guilty as sin.
 

Jenna

personality dialysis
Forum Clout
65,983
I don’t know if you’re playing a bit but how do you feel about the day Scott was found he had dyed his hair, was carrying two ID’s, a passport, a shit ton of cash, changes of clothes, 4 cell phones, etc etc?


My OP was ironic because there really is so much shit that makes him look guilty - and sometimes thats really all you need. He’s an avid golfer but on the one day his wife goes missing he goes fishing…and tells all his friends later that he went golfing. The DNA found on the pliers. Scott said he left home at around 9:30 and the dog wasn’t found until 10:14-10:30, essentially giving Laci an hour to independently disappear or for Scott to murder her. You have the spot the investigators didn’t check in the warehouse because “the power was out”, even though Scott claimed to have been sending emails from there the same day. You have the entire affair and the fact he told his mistress that his wife was missing a month before it actually happened. You have his constant lying and smug asshole face saying he told Laci of the affair before she went missing, or that he told his mistress he had a wife from the start. Or that his families bodys wash up at the same place he went fishing (albeit months later.)

20 years and not a single appeal that was worthwhile. Guys guilty as sin.

Do you really believe retard Scott is that good of a crime scene cleaner? No crime scene anywhere on the property where he murdered Laci, no evidence in the truck, no evidence on the boat. Just one strand of his wife's hair on a pair of pliers (and when you live with a chick, their hair gets everywhere).

No traces of any crime, no traces of any cleanup either. But he had a "smug asshole face" so just mentally excuse how he apparently teleported Laci's body from the kitchen to the bottom of the bay.
 

Suetonius

LAUGH.
Forum Clout
124,272
Do you really believe retard Scott is that good of a crime scene cleaner? No crime scene anywhere on the property where he murdered Laci, no evidence in the truck, no evidence on the boat. Just one strand of his wife's hair on a pair of pliers (and when you live with a chick, their hair gets everywhere).

No traces of any crime, no traces of any cleanup either. But he had a "smug asshole face" so just mentally excuse how he apparently teleported Laci's body from the kitchen to the bottom of the bay.
Do i acknowledge there are holes? Of course. There are holes in every crime and no one is going to have a perfect recreation of how someone did it. The only burden the state needs to meet is beyond a reasonable doubt. This also does NOT mean they have to reason that Scott is the only person who could do it, only the most likely.

I’ll use another murder as an example. Guy named Christian Halderson murdered his parents. Found guilty and sent to prison. The prosecution argued that there was no way to rule out anybody else could have committed the crime, but through the evidence presented it was ruled that the most likely culprit was him. The evidence was that he had lied about his education and career to his parents for years and only a day after his dad found out the lies were they murdered. No evidence of an actual murder was found in the house beyond a fragment of skull near the fireplace. No blood, no tools, no DNA in the home. However, through video cameras in the neighborhood they determined all through the night his parents “left town” the fireplace could be seen going up and down, the garage light was being turned on and off, and he was seen buying ice at a grocery store - later used to chill his parents body parts. He was geolocated through Snapchat and when police searched the area they found the bodies.

Basically long shory stort is that there doesn’t have to be this perfect 1080p video of the full crime to convict someone.
 

BUBBLER

Janny of Ribbers
Forum Clout
118,137
I don’t know if you’re playing a bit but how do you feel about the day Scott was found he had dyed his hair, was carrying two ID’s, a passport, a shit ton of cash, changes of clothes, 4 cell phones, etc etc?


My OP was ironic because there really is so much shit that makes him look guilty - and sometimes thats really all you need. He’s an avid golfer but on the one day his wife goes missing he goes fishing…and tells all his friends later that he went golfing. The DNA found on the pliers. Scott said he left home at around 9:30 and the dog wasn’t found until 10:14-10:30, essentially giving Laci an hour to independently disappear or for Scott to murder her. You have the spot the investigators didn’t check in the warehouse because “the power was out”, even though Scott claimed to have been sending emails from there the same day. You have the entire affair and the fact he told his mistress that his wife was missing a month before it actually happened. You have his constant lying and smug asshole face saying he told Laci of the affair before she went missing, or that he told his mistress he had a wife from the start. Or that his families bodys wash up at the same place he went fishing (albeit months later.)

20 years and not a single appeal that was worthwhile. Guys guilty as sin.
I think he probably did it but death penalty based purely on circumstantial evidence is a bit much
 
Forum Clout
5,340
n2jvjfxbbs221.jpg
Laci was way hotter than Amber to be honest witcha.
 
G

guest

Guest
Is this the guy whose wife went missing, then after the media released the fact that he had gone fishing earlier in the day, the niggers who murdered her dumped her into the lake? Yeah, that shit's fucked. That's why I always tell people, it's not enough to be innocent. You don't even want the possible appearance of guilt. Stay as far away from the "justice" system as possible.

Also, the average juror is a fucking idiot CNN watching rube. You can explain the definition of "proof beyond any reasonable doubt" to them 100 times, and they will still convict someone if they are 51% sure that they did it.
 
Top