G
guest
Guest
What are Patty's lawyers telling him? I mean he's a pay pig to them but they have to sell him on something, right?
The way I see it, his case against us is nonexistent. No judge is going to target a large group of people on behalf of an unlovable cis white male faggot with bitchtits. But legally the only case I see him pursuing is identity theft. And that's only if there were clear financial repercussions and only then, if the perpetrator received money from the fraudulent activity. Also the hurdle of reasonableness, like the fraudulent behavior be at all plausible. If somebody issues a credit card to his toilet I wouldn't be shocked but it would be VISA that has explaining to do.
Any postings on a website that allows accounts to be anonymous are irrelevant. Any posts that allow for anonymity would be non admissible as evidence since they are so clearly fakable. The only lawyers that would pursue this nonsense are predatory midwestern "Aw, geez!"
types.
The way I see it, his case against us is nonexistent. No judge is going to target a large group of people on behalf of an unlovable cis white male faggot with bitchtits. But legally the only case I see him pursuing is identity theft. And that's only if there were clear financial repercussions and only then, if the perpetrator received money from the fraudulent activity. Also the hurdle of reasonableness, like the fraudulent behavior be at all plausible. If somebody issues a credit card to his toilet I wouldn't be shocked but it would be VISA that has explaining to do.
Any postings on a website that allows accounts to be anonymous are irrelevant. Any posts that allow for anonymity would be non admissible as evidence since they are so clearly fakable. The only lawyers that would pursue this nonsense are predatory midwestern "Aw, geez!"
types.
Last edited by a moderator: