advicefagging post: the De Novo hearing is definitely happening because it costs $0 and they're automatically granted literally always
if you're going to represent yourself again, interrupt Fatrick with OBJECTION HEARSAY at anything that someone else said, OBJECTION RELEVANCY at stuff that has nothing to do with you such as niggeroni. Hammer it home that what's before the judge is a 2-hour window in mid February. It'll also fluster and irritate the pig making him more erratic.
Mention your fucked up hand to downplay yourself as a threat in a fight
Mention he lied in the petition, both the African American thing and the bit about you continuing to contact him since that night
mention he sued 60 john does and videos about him have hundreds of thousands of views, he can't pin anything that came from random numbers on you
If his faggot friends testify or they write and sign an affidavit, erode their credibility by the fact that they had been drinking all night
he's going to be way more prepared, don't relax
All solid advice,
@ThatRetardWhoDoxxdHimself
As a fellow retard with no knowledge of the law, I'd emphasise that anything that happened at the bar is hearsay, and is likely to be inadmissible without a witness for you to question. You have the right to face your accusers, after all. Also point out that the bar handed over your credit card details to Pat which is at the very least unethical and most likely in violation of their contract with their credit card provider (who expects them to keep such details safe) and may even be illegal. That all suggests that the bar staff are ssssscumbags, which should lower their credibility in court. If you can get it dismissed as hearsay, then you won't have to answer to it.
Also, if he tries to enter the text messages into evidence, and there are
any of his responses to you missing, object as the evidence has been tampered with. If he says he just deleted some of them, ask how you can be assured of that? How do you know he hasn't edited any of your texts, or even added new ones? Why wasn't he upfront about it? How can the judge expect you to answer to evidence that Pat has admitted to tampering with?
It's up to him to show that he's being honest at that point, and he's in trouble if he isn't. You could
really be a cunt and ask for him to swear that the evidence is whole and correct before he enters it as evidence - like Pat had to do in the LOLsuit - and then
after that accuse him of perjury. $10k fine, felony conviction, up to six years in the pen, and you'd never be short of a blowjob around here. If he declines, ask that it not be allowed as evidence, as even the plaintiff doesn't believe it's accurate.
With luck, that leaves him without witnesses at the bar, or electronic evidence against you - i.e. he has nothing, and is again wasting the court's time.
If you win, ask the judge if there's anything he can do to prevent this vexatious litigant from bothering you again - sanctions, fines. He'll probably say no, or suggest a lawyer - but you never know your luck...
And, lastly, get a lawyer. Even talk to legal aid in Wisconsin if you have to; anything's better than nothing.
EDIT: If that bar receipt comes up, ask to see the chain of custody documentation on it - how long was it in Pat's greasy little trotters, being tampered with? Maybe having nasty words written on it?
archive.ph
