- Forum Clout
- 57,311
Should have kept the first ending to Clerks. Nice sticking to your vision, stupid.
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
I'm embarrassed that I remember Dogma as a fun movie. I watched it 10+ years ago and found it entertaining.I agree but putting this in comedian criticism doesn't make sense. I can't believe I liked Clerks 1 +2 and Mallrats when I was younger.
She has PCOS. That condition makes chicks grow a lot of facial hair. Full beards, in some cases. I knew a chick that had it and she had to shave every day and you could even see a five o’clock shadow on her some days.WWAW his daughter's fawkin dumper tho? Included her caption essay for maximum ribs
View attachment 32785
She’ll be more of a man than her dad thenShe has PCOS. That condition makes chicks grow a lot of facial hair. Full beards, in some cases. I knew a chick that had it and she had to shave every day and you could even see a five o’clock shadow on her some days.
That semi-ironic artsiness might've been refreshing back in the mid-90s maaahn, but it already felt very dated when I watched the film for the first time 15 years ago.Also, what's up with the artsy random title cards? Vagary. Malaise. Perspicacity. That faggot be pretending they tie into the scenes somehow, and that he didn't intentionally look up difficult words in a lexicon.
I agree but putting this in comedian criticism doesn't make sense. I can't believe I liked Clerks 1 +2 and Mallrats when I was younger.
And it's supposed to be his one redeeming thing.
Hey I was just implying his movies aren't funny. No disrespect.They are comedy movies but thanks for being the forum hall monitor.
According to who? He sucks uneblievably, but I still like his shit out of nostalgia.
Clerks 2 was a good movie. The shittiest parts of his movies are when they make gay references/reenactments of other movies.
If you like Kevin Smith it's always with an asterisk.
I heard Linda Fiorentino was a huge cunt on the set of Dogma if it makes you feel any better. Considering that she had the lead role in the movie means she probably ruined the whole experience for him which makes me very happy.
Every time they have a response it's always the greatest off the cuff comeback you could ever hear. It's almost as if somebody sat there and rewrote it over and over and over and over again.
Yes but there's a difference between good script writing and bad script writing. When the dialogue sounds fake and unbelievable, you aren't doing it right. His movies are the only ones where the dialogue is out of place and sounds overly written.Yeah but you just described scriptwriting.
Yes, and thank you for saying that because I was trying to think of it but couldn't articulate it. He writes every character with the same emotions and point of view that he has, except he writes everybody way too intelligently. That's where the unbelievable dialogue comes in. Nobody who's working at a fast food restaurant in their forties speak that articulately, witty and have snappy comebacks that quickly. Maybe if he limited it to one character per movie like Brody in mallrats or Randall and clerks it would make sense. But EVERY character saying the funniest joke possible every single time off the cuff? It sounds fake as hell.I think what you're more saying is he writes every single character in his own voice and gives them his own traits...
Exactly.ROSARIO DAWSON is not managing a fast food restaurant, and she's not having witty banter with the 50 year old "bachelors."
His movies are the only ones where the dialogue is out of place and sounds overly written.
I mean if you want to write an amazing comeback to something, do it once or twice per movie. I can picture him waking up at 3am going "no no this would sound WAY better!" At every piece of dialogue in his script.I can't disagree, even as a kid I recognized his almost Seinfeld shtick, it's repetitive and does in fact make me bite my own teeth *sniff*
You can probably imagine Kevin sitting there laboring over the script, "yeah people are going to say this movie is all killer no filler" Then he writes an early 20s woman to argue like a 40 year old comic book guy.
Kevin Smith fans are like The Big Lebowski people who dress up and make people call them The Dude.
Weed is what REALLY fucked up his movies. I mean the old ones weren't anything outstanding that belong in the criterion collection or anything, but at least they were okay. I mean Dogma was actually an alright movie.I like his movies out of nostalgia, and even then I cringe at his silent acting, which you know he studied and practiced in the mirror like a psycho.
He has become so pretentious and eager to be seen as positive. Probably smoked himself schizo. People who smoke weed care too much about how they're being perceived, now add that to the fact that he thinks he's Marcel Marceau brilliant silent actor. What an asshole.
My ex used to write like this when she was super addicted to Xanax...WWAW his daughter's fawkin dumper tho? Included her caption essay for maximum ribs
View attachment 32785
And like everyone who smokes too much weed, he marvels over absolutely everything like it's the most incredible piece of art he's ever seen. And his movies clearly devolved after he started smoking weed all day...Tusk, Yoga Hosers, and that atrocious Reboot, which was obviously the "work" of someone stoned out of his gourd.Weed is what REALLY fucked up his movies. I mean the old ones weren't anything outstanding that belong in the criterion collection or anything, but at least they were okay. I mean Dogma was actually an alright movie.
But then he started smoking pot and got involved with people like Seth Rogen, and started making movies like tusk. Yech.
Fuck out of here with that garbage.
This forum is dedicated exclusively to parody, comedy, and satirical content. None of the statements, opinions, or depictions shared on this platform should be considered or treated as factual information under any circumstances. All content is intended for entertainment purposes only and should be regarded as fictional, exaggerated, or purely the result of personal opinions and creative expression.
Please be aware that this forum may feature discussions and content related to taboo, controversial, or potentially offensive subjects. The purpose of this content is not to incite harm but to engage in satire and explore the boundaries of humor. If you are sensitive to such subjects or are easily offended, we kindly advise that you leave the forum.
Any similarities to real people, events, or situations are either coincidental or based on real-life inspirations but used within the context of fair use satire. By accepting this disclaimer, you acknowledge and understand that the content found within this forum is strictly meant for parody, satire, and entertainment. You agree not to hold the forum, its administrators, moderators, or users responsible for any content that may be perceived as offensive or inappropriate. You enter and participate in this forum at your own risk, with full awareness that everything on this platform is purely comedic, satirical, or opinion-based, and should never be taken as factual information.
If any information or discussion on this platform triggers distressing emotions or thoughts, please leave immediately and consider seeking assistance.
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (USA): Phone: 1-800-273-TALK (1-800-273-8255) Website: https://suicidepreventionlifeline.org/