Josiah Munoz Interviews Patrick S. Tomlinson - Part 5 (THE FINALE)

[guest]

Look her up. I don't think she's what you're really thinking she is.

Gosia Mielech.

Holy ham. This polack broad must be twisting you into pretzels at night.

 

[guest]

Warning - wall of text below.

I was legitimately stressed out through my first listen of this conversation. I've listened to it 4 more times since then to try to break things down.

There are two personalities at play here - the real Patrick (PST) and Stealthygeek. They are divided by a line but they are both generally omnipresent and work together except in the most extreme circumstances.

PST is the guy we heard through the first 4 interviews and the beginning of this one. PST is responsible for decision making, critical thinking and making memories. In his normal PST state, he has the capacity to socialize his thoughts, be minimally creative and can understand and respond to questions/comments. His opinions may be stupid as shit but he can at least articulate them.

The further into PST he goes, the more confident he becomes. He speaks with more conviction and makes increasingly outlandish statements like "I won't pay quasi" or "gamergate 2.0" to build himself up.

Stealthygeek is the persona responsible for protecting PST. Stealthygeek relies on the memories and actions of PST to defend against attackers. Stealthygeek's sole purpose is to aid PST and apply constant upward pressure to get back above the line and further into PST because Stealthygeek is inherently chaotic.

The "idea" of Josiah was what he used to build himself up - Josiah represented his opportunity to accomplish his goals and validate his existence. He wanted it so bad that he let his guard down and caught the virus. Once PST realized he had made a monumental mistake, Stealthygeek immediately emerged to defend.

Instead of letting him process that it was his own judgment and irrational exuberance at the idea of fame that led him down the wrong path, stealthygeek immediately perceived the situation as a felony case of deceit and betrayal. This absolved PST of any accountability and clearly defined where he sat in the good vs. evil situation that must be fought.

If PST or Stealthygeek can't fight using PST's legitimate decisions, actions or memories, he dives deeper into Stealthygeek and PST increasingly relinquishes control. This is where the "child," "baby infant" and "you did not listen to the judge" comes from.

I suspect that at the deepest parts of Stealthygeek, he is incapable of processing any single comment because he feels like he is surrounded and he enters into a blacked out state. At that point, his counters become the verbal equivalent of spraying and praying aimlessly until the magazine empties out. I strongly believe he is not hearing actual words or making any memories at this point, which is why he keeps repeating "you are not speaking" or "blah blah blah." He eventually begins to creep back up towards PST because nothing is being processed and/or Josiah isn't speaking.

He really is a broken person who appears to have been given up on by his family and allowed to free fall deeper into his mental illness. The only time I've ever seen anyone from his family try to help him is when his alleged brother posted one time right after the CA hearing. I don't blame them - just find that his family situation is so bad that he really is all alone out there, allowed to make one huge life-altering mistake after another.

At the end of the day though, this is all just the opinion of a guy who bakes bread at a fast casual restaurant.

Feed Nana

I believe Fat purposefully arranged call times to coincide with his nightly visits to Hooligan's, a 'pub and grill', so fellow regulars would think he was important.

Boy, there must be egg on his face now!

Usually it’s semen.

 

[HotDogJoe]

This entire saga was great but the one disappointment of it is that we didn't get confirmation of who's funding the lawsuit. I know it's almost certainly the SFWA but his retarded confidence that he'll never have to pay the money back makes me think that might not be the case.

Either way, he's fat.

 

[NoBacon]

This entire saga was great but the one disappointment of it is that we didn't get confirmation of who's funding the lawsuit. I know it's almost certainly the SFWA but his retarded confidence that he'll never have to pay the money back makes me think that might not be the case.

Either way, he's fat.

It’s the SFWA, there’s zero doubt about that.

 

[IGotATreeOnMyHouse85]

It’s the SFWA, there’s zero doubt about that.

It’s def the SFWA, he’s just so delusional he believes he won’t have to pay it back because he’s a very special boy. In his mind the rules don’t apply to Fat Rick so he hasn’t spend a cent and will never have to pay anyone.

 

[FurBurger]

It’s the SFWA, there’s zero doubt about that.

It's not likely to be the SFWA as they are a 501(c)3 charity, and the lawsuit is a defamation case for the benefit of Fatrick and Fatrick alone. Funding that could cost them their 501(c)3 charity status, as charities must not be "operated for the benefit of private interests".

Unless he's lied to them about what the case entails, and they aren't paying attention, in which case funding that could also cost them their 501(c)3 charity status.

The IRS have a page on how to complain if we find out the SFWA are, in fact, Funding Fatrickster.

 

[IGotATreeOnMyHouse85]

It's not likely to be the SFWA as they are a 501(c)3 charity, and the lawsuit is a defamation case for the benefit of Fatrick and Fatrick alone. Funding that could cost them their 501(c)3 charity status, as charities must not be "operated for the benefit of private interests".

Unless he's lied to them about what the case entails, and they aren't paying attention, in which case funding that could also cost them their 501(c)3 charity status.

The IRS have a page on how to complain if we find out the SFWA are, in fact, Funding Fatrickster.

I think they got involved over the whole good reads issue. That seems to be a common problem with SFWA writers getting review bombed because a majority of their writers act like assholes on social media and cry when it leads to a negative reaction. I’m sure Pat fibbed a lot about what was going on but that seemed to catch their attention as we saw many of the other mutants in the SFWA get behind piggy and cry to good reads. The CA hearing was all about trolling reviews and the judge even said something along the lines of he doesn’t like people leaving fake bad reviews but it’s not against the law to do so.

The good reads / review issue is something the SFWA has long cried about so I’m sure they saw funding Pat’s case (which they were most likely told some tall tales from Tomlinson) as a benefit to all their members. It might also explain why Pat thinks he doesn’t have a to pay since he’s doing this for ALL writers. Not so.

 

[Brooke Shields]

This video proves that "Fat faggot" is a way better insult than anything Patrick could come up with

Nyumnyumnyum you have nothing to sayyyy child.
That is why you use the "F" word

 

[IGotATreeOnMyHouse85]

Nyumnyumnyum you have nothing to sayyyy child.
That is why you use the "F" word

To me faggot was always another way of saying asshole or idiot. I never even looked at it as something towards gays, just “quit being a faggot!” When someone is doing something stupid or annoying. That makes Patrick a huge faggot due to his awful behavior. The Iron Shiek said it best with “YOU ARE GAY AND FAGGOT!” which proves gay and faggot are two different things.

 

[guest]

Nyumnyumnyum you have nothing to sayyyy child.
That is why you use the "F" word

Which word is the "F" word to him? Fat or Faggot?

 

[UnPRePared]

Holy ham. This polack broad must be twisting you into pretzels at night.

It takes work to keep up with her - but it's absolutely worth the effort.

 

[Mike Glyer]

Y

It takes work to keep up with her - but it's absolutely worth the effort.

You should post a picture of her that isn't online since you are the real Ray Wilson. Pussy.

 

[UnPRePared]

Y

You should post a picture of her that isn't online since you are the real Ray Wilson. Pussy.

And confirm everything so I can be cancelled, too? Poland is better about it than your U.S. of A, but it still exists here, and it's growing.

I've worked very hard for my middle-road Rut that I'm in, and I plan to keep it, thaaaaannnkkk yyyyooouuuuu.

This has been my Wils-O-Torial.

 

[SmellenShoehorn]

Which word is the "F" word to him? Fat or Faggot?

"Father"

 

[Harry Powell]

I understand that faggot is hurtful to the gays, and I generally don’t say it IRL anymore. But there is simply no replacement for it as an insult to another man. It was a great word.

 

[FurBurger]

I think they got involved over the whole good reads issue. That seems to be a common problem with SFWA writers getting review bombed because a majority of their writers act like assholes on social media and cry when it leads to a negative reaction.

...sure, but they can't fund Fatrick's personal lawsuits. Getting honest reviews removed from Good Reads via shadowy back channels (potentially) benefits all their members, and fits their charter. Putting money towards getting us to stop calling him a fat, child-abandoning asshole does not benefit any of their other members, and puts their charity status in jeopardy (and not the good kind, with Norm as Burt Reynolds).

 

[RobertMewler]

...sure, but they can't fund Fatrick's personal lawsuits. Getting honest reviews removed from Good Reads via shadowy back channels (potentially) benefits all their members, and fits their charter. Putting money towards getting us to stop calling him a fat, child-abandoning asshole does not benefit any of their other members, and puts their charity status in jeopardy (and not the good kind, with Norm as Burt Reynolds).

I honestly believe they are that stupid and yes, funded his suit with their legal funds. If they consulted their lawyers on the worthiness of his case, it was probably to a female lawyer who 'reasoned' with her emotions and allowed it through.

But I doubt they even asked their lawyer anyway. It's the Grievance Committee who grants the loan. And who was on the committee? Cat Rambo, someone who hates us and felt personally injured by the trolls. Oh.. she has a grievance alright. So of course the case would be greenlit.

Grievance Committee - SFWA

Griefcom is here to help. Maybe your publisher isn’t paying you royalties, or you have parted ways and now you can’t get a letter of rights reversion.

www.sfwa.org

They no doubt decided the case had merit because it satisfied qualification #3:

"To fund or contribute to the funding of court actions brought by others in issues which are of importance to SFWA’s members and the business of writing and which may help to raise SFWA’s profile as a pro-active writers’ organization."

Legal Fund - SFWA

The SFWA Legal Fund makes grants available to authors who must take a writing-related dispute to court. Grants are made on a case-by-case basis, after review by the Grievance Committee and the SFWA attorney. Donate SFWA Legal Fund Guidelines The SFWA Legal Fund does not seek to promote or...

www.sfwa.org

The beauty of their stupidity is that we could ostensibly get their charity status taken from them for this violation lol.

 

[Mitch Weaver]

I honestly believe they are that stupid and yes, funded his suit with their legal funds. If they consulted their lawyers on the worthiness of his case, it was probably to a female lawyer who 'reasoned' with her emotions and allowed it through.

But I doubt they even asked their lawyer anyway. It's the Grievance Committee who grants the loan. And who was on the committee? Cat Rambo, someone who hates us and felt personally injured by the trolls. Oh.. she has a grievance alright. So of course the case would be greenlit.

Grievance Committee - SFWA

Griefcom is here to help. Maybe your publisher isn’t paying you royalties, or you have parted ways and now you can’t get a letter of rights reversion.

www.sfwa.org

They no doubt decided the case had merit because it satisfied qualification #3:

"To fund or contribute to the funding of court actions brought by others in issues which are of importance to SFWA’s members and the business of writing and which may help to raise SFWA’s profile as a pro-active writers’ organization."

Legal Fund - SFWA

The SFWA Legal Fund makes grants available to authors who must take a writing-related dispute to court. Grants are made on a case-by-case basis, after review by the Grievance Committee and the SFWA attorney. Donate SFWA Legal Fund Guidelines The SFWA Legal Fund does not seek to promote or...

www.sfwa.org

The beauty of their stupidity is that we could ostensibly get their charity status taken from them for this violation lol.

As Dusty says in Pure Country “let’s do it”

 

[CarolMaxheinie]

for a bunch of alleged “readers and authors”, they never bothered to read any Bad Friend Stock posts? I’d call that a $100k lesson learned…

 

[guest]

It takes work to keep up with her - but it's absolutely worth the effort.

Tag me in any time, brothaman.