When I finally got all-the-way banned from reddit it's because I was starting arguments in normie subs and responded to any mild disagreement with "I should fucking kill you." I thought it was a funny bit. I was only jokin'.
Since Jenna is fawkkking ghosting me **sniff**
I'll just speak generally. I can only moderate speech to the best of my abilitly. People have some grand ideas , but I need to know practically how that would work. How can I tell a joke, satirical post from something serious. As far as I can tell Jenna's solution is you can never joke about murder? But what does that even entail? Id like to see that played out in a proof of concept somewhere.
People wont believe this, but ill say it anyway. Im entirely open to suggestions on what to do differently. The issue is that I don't have any reasons to think those suggestions will work without a proof of concept, as i mentioned. I'm willing to listen to all your retarded suggestions, but why would I give them any weight without some type of evidence?
By proof of concept i mean a real functioning board with these requirements.
A Single admin and moderator. This is how I'm running things as everyone (Podcasters not included) are anonymous. I don't know any of you and I don't trust any of you with any responsibility by design.
A similar user base of kratom junkies, boomers etc. Cumtowns users would be close enough for comparison.
Not a buisness or actual job. So that's mr moons empire excluded.
Partially open registrations and public facing posts.
I realize the "single admin and mod" requirement is basically me setting up a cherry picked scenario that can't be achieved. I'm willing to see a proof of concept that could be implemented successfully.
If cumtowns moderation could be applied just by me, then I'm willing to use that as a template. I don't follow their drama , but haven't they been through several admins and they had to find a backup becuase he went nuts or something?
Say proof of concept again etc.