The only people against anonymity are people who make a living using their real name in the public, or those who think they will one day (see: S. Tomlinson, Patrick).
-
- Mr. Tomlinson's feud started after members of the now-defunct Reddit site r/opieandanthony got his Twitter account suspended, causing him to threaten some bored trolls who never heard of him with a libel lawsuit. The trolls responded predictably.
- Mr. Tomlinson has been instructed many times by friends, family, police, and attorneys to stop engaging with his trolls, and that continuing to provoke them will cause him to be trolled even more. Mr. Tomlinson wilfully ignores this advice.
- He would eventually file a defamation suit against 60 anonymous people which was dismissed with Mr. Tomlinson being ordered to pay $34,762.25 for opposing parties' attorney fees.
- He ended up paying $83,736.99 due to his unsuccessful attempts to dodge the court-ordered judgement, for which he faced jail time and contempt charges.
- He also filed 2 frivolous restraining orders against people who had engaged in First Amendment-protected behavior (one for texting him and another for attending his contempt of court hearing), both of which were dismissed.
- Early on in the lawsuit, Mr. Tomlinson vandalized his own motorcycle and submitted a false police report blaming the people he was suing.
- He accidentally sent surveillance video of the alleged vandal to a troll. The individual in the video is very obviously Patrick S. Tomlinson.
- Mr. Tomlinson has never submitted this video footage during any of his many media tours, and desperately tries to scrub it from the internet.
- Mr. Tomlinson claims that the surveillance video was initiated by his "motion-activated" camera, which only collects "30 seconds at a time", despite the video being 32 seconds long and beginning several seconds before the "vandal" enters into the frame.
- On 13 April 2023, the individual responsible for calling the fake emergences (SWATs) to Mr. Tomlinson's house, a SWAT-for-hire dealer named "Torswats", revealed that Mr. Tomlinson ordered the SWATs to his own house because he wanted to get in the news and sue the MPD for money.
- Torswats would repeat these allegations in private chats which were not intended for public view.
- Mr. Tomlinson has gone on multiple news tours since the SWATtings started in order to promote his victimhood brand, utilizing the services of Lenora Claire.
- He also recently sued the MPD for money.
I'll give Norton this, he's been consistent for 20 years.
- Thread starter Mr. Faggotry
- Start date
But he did so USING HIS REAL NAME
I don't care if it was bots or half a million soccer fans tweeting "nigger" in unison.
There is nothing surprising about this. Two weeks ago if I had mentioned that there were two teams playing soccer and it ended with a shootout, and that the coach put blacks in as a "diversity is our strength" play and they lost, what would the fans do?
I'm also sick of the "heads I win tails you lose" shit they do with diversity. You want to inject politics into faggot sports? Then you have to take the heat when it doesn't work out in your favor.
Seriously, what's the news here? That people get upset when their team who hasn't won since LBJ was president use racial epithets? That anyone uses racial epithets?
It's almost like having a diverse population doesn't actually unify people.
Imagine having such terrible opinions that you steal from Piers Morgan word for word for Twitter clout
G
guest
Guest
Personally, I don't think they should get racial abuse for missing a penalty but that's just me. Southgate, the manager, deserves the blame for giving the final decisive penalty to a 19 year old kid with no experience.
It’s part of their strategy. They want to appear like they’re on the side of the people standing up to the evil billionaire techies. None of these people are stupid enough (Patrick S Tomlinson included but barely) to not understand that there’s no way of fixing it. They just think they can trick dumber people into believing it. If you banned the word “nigger”as in instant account lock if you used it, you would have to ban all the iterations of it as well. Which means all of black Twitter would get suspended immediately. If you remove anonymity 90% of Twitter, would leave, a good portion of Facebook would leave, etc. Faggotry all around us in summation.
G
guest
Guest
There is something called First Amendment and some United States Supreme Court (ok maybe not USSC) rulings that disagree with Piers. And since most of the social media platforms are based in US his point isn't valid.