• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

I Wanna See the Courthouse Movie! Updated Schedules, Links to Casefiles

G

guest

Guest
What is a pretext (in legal terms)? Does it carry special legal weight?

Not a lawyer but this is essentially what is going on

[URL unfurl="true"]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretext[/URL]

In [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_the_United_States']US law[/URL], a pretext usually describes false reasons that hide the true intentions or motivations for a legal action. If a party can establish a [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prima_facie']prima facie[/URL] case for the proffered evidence, the opposing party must prove that these reasons were "pretextual" or false. This can be accomplished by directly demonstrating that the motivations behind the presentation of evidence is false, or indirectly by evidence that the motivations are not "credible".[URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretext#cite_note-uslegal-1'][1][/URL]

Plaintiff is saying that prima facie is established based on the pedo comment. Defendant says this is a pretext to obtain the petitioners identity, not that they didn't establish the prima facie basis. It is pretty obviously a pretext as the plaintiff literally says this is what they are doing lol.
 

FranksWirecutters

Glow nigger. Got any of those IPs for me?
Forum Clout
32,398
Could you just once try and satisfy Krinsky instead of getting off in a sock?


DeadbedroomKrinsky.jpg
 
G

guest

Guest
Not a lawyer but this is essentially what is going on

[URL unfurl="true"]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretext[/URL]



Plaintiff is saying that prima facie is established based on the pedo comment. Defendant says this is a pretext to obtain the petitioners identity, not that they didn't establish the prima facie basis. It is pretty obviously a pretext as the plaintiff literally says this is what they are doing lol.
Not to mention we’ve heard him say on the phone he wants to publicly shame and ruin everyone
 

PeteRose

Forum Clout
7,372
Here's a direct link to the PDF:


"Because Petitioner’s additional fees are reasonable and supported by evidence, the Court should award those fees in the amount of $6,529.25 in addition to the $17,210 previously requested."

$23,739.25

Oopsie doodles.
rick never expected this shit. the sfwa isnt covering any of that money fat boy.
 
Top