I Wanna See the Courthouse Movie! Updated Schedules, Links to Casefiles

[Gay Faggot.]

Didn’t the fat pig have to set up a payment plan for it? How poor are you that you can’t pay a court fine for speeding in one go?

Let’s not get our Fistory wrong here. He did not need a pay plan for the amounT was Trivial. He just need to know exactly how long he had to pay it. As all people who make 6 figures are concerned about. Instead of just paying it as soon as you get home and not caring.

 

[RobertMewler]

Anyone know if that audio of Pat saying "when I find them they're dead" is admissible in court? I've read the latest submission and they don't use it.

The recording would not be allowed in a Wisconsin civil court proceeding: https://www.karplawfirm.com/can-wiretapped-evidence-be-used-in-the-courtroom/

However, there's nothing wrong with playing said recording to an attorney for his review and advice on next steps.

 

[AntSucks]

Likely not as it’s recorded secretly ?

But didn't he fat finger his phone and called an answer service? That's got to be admissible. It is in my court of my opinion. I rule, he's fat.

 

[Pringle Can Lothario]

The oopsie doodles at the end would give Fatrick's lawyer reason to say the recording was doctored.

 

[LockedHDD__Pot]

If a user gets locked out of OnA Forums (including because they forgot their fake email address or the password reset function was not working), they just make a new account to access the service.

damn straight, nigga!

 

[guest]

But didn't he fat finger his phone and called an answer service? That's got to be admissible. It is in my court of my opinion. I rule, he's fat.

It would probably be admissible. Federal court has ruled that "butt dials" do not have an expectation of privacy. However, why try to fight with if it is allowed, and then more questions about who it was sent to. The context etc without the person who received the voicemail able to be deposed.

Basically there seems to be enough evidence from his own words, so why make things more complicated

[URL unfurl="true"]https://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/Huff%20v%20Spaw%206th%20Circuit%20opinion.pdf[/URL]

~~not a lawyer~~

 

[IGotATreeOnMyHouse85]

Watching Pena effortlessly wipe the floor with that chubby little goblin that Patty had assigned to him was hilarious. The judge declaring that Patty was raising his hand was a truly great moment too. Just the thought of him beet red with anger to the point that he felt the need to to Kool Aid Man himself into the middle of a live court hearing will never fail to inflict damage on my ribs.

That will never not be funny, you know he was trying so hard to keep it together. He was def on the verge of tears and screaming. I bet some damage was done to the half house that day.

 

[Guest]

Likely not as it’s recorded secretly ?

Secretly? He fucking called and left it on a voicemail.

I think the issue would probably be that it was left for spaceedge not quasi, and would be difficult to prove the provenance and veracity of it

edit was wrong it was left for dan

 

[guest]

The oopsie doodles at the end would give Fatrick's lawyer reason to say the recording was doctored.

If anyone needs the original, all you have to do is ask...

 

[Guest]

The recording would not be allowed in a Wisconsin civil court proceeding: [URL]https://www.karplawfirm.com/can-wiretapped-evidence-be-used-in-the-courtroom/[/URL]

However, there's nothing wrong with playing said recording to an attorney for his review and advice on next steps.

But it’s not wiretapping- the fat retard left it on dan’s voicemail

oops forgot it was Dan not Thomas apostle

 

[Udders]

If anyone needs the original, all you have to do is ask...

View attachment 2752

Nice Christmas Eve, stupid.

 

[Pringle Can Lothario]

Thanks, Mr. Chicopee. Wasn't meant as an insult.

 

[Guest]

Secretly? He fucking called and left it on a voicemail.

I think the issue would probably be that it was left for spaceedge not quasi, and would be difficult to prove the provenance and veracity of it

edit was wrong it was left for dan

Oh yeah lol, I’m confusing it with the hooligans call

 

[Nick_Carpinelli]

What about his "if I ever do any see of them" threat? Is that too incoherent to be admissible?

 

[RoTheHo69]

What about his "if I ever do any see of them" threat? Is that too incoherent to be admissible?

About as incoherent as big fat roland esq.

 

[guest]

What about his "if I ever do any see of them" threat? Is that too incoherent to be admissible?

That’s what i thought they were talking about the whole time. What was on the voicemail?

 

[Getoffmylawn2]

That’s what i thought they were talking about the whole time. What was on the voicemail?

It was him saying "As soon as I figure out who they are, they're dead"

 

[guest]

It was him saying "As soon as I figure out who they are, they're dead"

Ok then that’s what I thought the Hooligans call was. Im missing one or the other apparently

 

[IGotATreeOnMyHouse85]

What about his "if I ever do any see of them" threat? Is that too incoherent to be admissible?

Unfortunately, speaking like a lying fat retard is not admissible in a court of law. No matter how hilarious it is.

 

[Nick_Carpinelli]

Ok then that’s what I thought the Hooligans call was. Im missing one or the other apparently

I was referring to his comments made during the Strictly Stalking podcast. He tried to talk like a tough guy but flubbed his line and said "any see of them" instead of "see any of them." This thread has the video.