• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

I Wanna See the Courthouse Movie! - Part 3

RobertMewler

Forum Clout
98,839
Liars:

160f061e29956c927d0935f0a44152b0.jpg
 
G

guest

Guest
"It is not difficult to see that the video of the Court hearing was edited with additional graphics to make a mockery of Mr. Tomlinson."

hahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahaha
1F461317-2856-4B47-BFF8-5A1C5DE40A48.jpeg


that is an outrageous accusation. I didn’t record the hearing but I was there with many other people watching and at no time was anyone ordered to leave, nor should they have been. Which we know is true because there’s a recording of it… insane.
 

BudDickman

Forum Clout
41,878
He actually cited Wikipedia in a legal document, to malign the platform used to host the video that anyone with internet access could have posted. Judges love it when you obfuscate issues with irrelevant bullshit.

Notice that Jerry Jen does not say anything about the SFWA's history of supporting pedophiles, or the possibility that the SFWA funded Pat's lawsuit, or even the fact that Pat was recorded saying that he will never pay Quasi.

He focuses on the salient facts, which is that Pat has a debt that he has made no effort to settle, and that the SFWA has refused to produce relevant information about his financial situation. No speculation or nonsense.
 
G

guest

Guest
Can they use the Josiah tapes of Rick admitting that "an organization that I am a member of" was helping him? Or even Starship Fonzie or whatever the fuck that guy's name is saying that the SFWA bankrolled it, though that might be hearsay.
 
G

guest

Guest
I
He actually cited Wikipedia in a legal document, to malign the platform used to host the video that anyone with internet access could have posted. Judges love it when you obfuscate issues with irrelevant bullshit.

Notice that Jerry Jen does not say anything about the SFWA's history of supporting pedophiles, or the possibility that the SFWA funded Pat's lawsuit, or even the fact that Pat was recorded saying that he will never pay Quasi.

He focuses on the salient facts, which is that Pat has a debt that he has made no effort to settle, and that the SFWA has refused to produce relevant information about his financial situation. No speculation or nonsense.
I can’t believe this is real. They put the Apostlegate promo in a real legal document and cited it as an example of falsely accusing people of pedophilia. A video that shows mugshots and court cases/convictions for child sex crimes by their members. And their lawyer brought it up.

We got lost for a few days there. Thank you SFWA for putting the attention back where it belongs.
 

Cuphead

Formerly know as Fat Abbot
Forum Clout
51,618
It's always funny how Patrick and the SFWA try to drag in a bunch of stuff unrelated to what the actual hearing is about and think it will somehow convince the judge to side with them. Something tells me the hearing next week is going to be a laugh riot!
 
Top