- Forum Clout
- 111,136
Hersch da ting. Not providing the info would increase the likelihood of them getting harassed anyway, and the easiest way to not get harassed is to totally sell out Patrick.
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
I still can't wrap my head around the fact that the SFWA are unable to provide a copy of payment from Pat to the SFWA for union dues. Especially if Pat's doing revolving annual transactions on his card. I'm not an accountant and I've never really worked in accounting, but I understand that any basic accounting software can pull a copy of a transaction. At the minimum they can get it from a credit card processing merchant. I'm curious if Jen brings this up and how/if Sohn can explain it.BDJ request:
Sohn modification:
BDJ accepted this form, but when Sohn took it to SFWA for approval they balked at providing a declaration. They were less secure about "reasonable" doing the heavy lifting. ("In connection with its search" hinges on Sohn's "reasonable" search rather than BDJ's "all [...] information [...] responsive to the subpoena.")
BDJ noted his client wondered why the declaration that records were diligently searched is difficult to produce without a protective order. (Sohn now absurdly claims any SFWA officer signing it might face harassment. All SFWA officers are listed on their website AFAIK.)
It seems Sohn expected to exploit the proposed declaration's "reasonable" technicality by skipping categories of documents he doesn't like. After all, Sohn argues in the latest Reply that "The Subpoena is overbroad on its face. It seeks records containing information that go well beyond Mr. Tomlinson’s finances and assets." Sohn goes on to characterize what he supposedly diligently searched as "uncalled for [...] sensitive [...] not relevant [...] say nothing [...] would not reveal [...] egregious [...] improper fishing expedition [...] How is this demand “tailored” [...] no justifiable grounds."
I trust Jerry isn't going to go down without a fightI still can't wrap my head around the fact that the SFWA are unable to provide a copy of payment from Pat to the SFWA for union dues. Especially if Pat's doing revolving annual transactions on his card. I'm not an accountant and I've never really worked in accounting, but I understand that any basic accounting software can pull a copy of a transaction. At the minimum they can get it from a credit card processing merchant. I'm curious if Jen brings this up and how/if Sohn can explain it.
Unless they're constantly wiping their history to cover up traces of pedophiliaAlso I guess the SFWA never did pay Pat, they presumably just got invoiced the legal costs on his behalf
It's good to see, even as the case wears on, they're still remembering what's important.Anthony Cumia is in BLATANT DENIAL about being a PEDOPHILE
But I would have to assume this opens them up to become liable for paying Quasi's judgement. Otherwise, you could just have rich people fund bullshit lawsuits and bankrupt defendents over 1st Amendment issues. That's exactly what anti-SLAPP laws are designed to prevent.Also I guess the SFWA never did pay Pat, they presumably just got invoiced the legal costs on his behalf
I'm not a lawyer, but it is such a weird fucking legal response.My fucking ribs
View attachment 42185
Why are all the women in the patverse built like wild pigs?
Pure speculation, but maybe they inducted Patrick for free at some point - being a special boy. If the transaction actually happened after 2020 (within the main scope of the subpoena), their registration process maybe had a step where the system needed the card info either set or updated, so they just recorded the updated card info, did a test transaction or manually returned an actual payment made.I still can't wrap my head around the fact that the SFWA are unable to provide a copy of payment from Pat to the SFWA for union dues. Especially if Pat's doing revolving annual transactions on his card. I'm not an accountant and I've never really worked in accounting, but I understand that any basic accounting software can pull a copy of a transaction. At the minimum they can get it from a credit card processing merchant. I'm curious if Jen brings this up and how/if Sohn can explain it.
I understand your speculation, but I read their membership rules https://www.sfwa.org/about/join-us/sfwa-membership-requirements/Pure speculation, but maybe they inducted Patrick for free at some point - being a special boy. If the transaction actually happened after 2020 (within the main scope of the subpoena), their registration process maybe had a step where the system needed the card info either set or updated, so they just recorded the updated card info, did a test transaction or manually returned an actual payment made.
That said, Sohn never outright mentions the date or context of the AMEX card info, so it can very well predate 2020 while still being active membership information on Patrick's profile or whatever.
There was a public Twitter conversation with Mary Three Names that showed Patrick rejoined SFWA just before the lawsuit was filed; there seemed to be tensions and Patrick was implying he was owed the membership. Sohn, on the other hand, says Patrick has been a member for more than a decade and fails to explain that episode.
So it's possible that he was just switched as a member internally without needing to pay dues after previously ragelapsing because he didn't feel SFWA was doing enough for his internet persona. There's no shortage of ballwashers around.
Jen is really bending Sohn over a table a fucking him up that ass with his huge 7.5-inch Asian cock.I'm not a lawyer, but it is such a weird fucking legal response.
JJ: We need your financial info about Pat.
SFWA: Look at this bitchute account!
It's a complete non-sequitur.
Good point. Jen wants to arrange quasis payment and it requires not just their payment history. He doesnt give a shit about what we think or want. Im sure there are a few people getting financial requests in order to resolve this since pat is refusing a court order to pay. Us laughing about it is just a byproduct of their frivolous failed lawsuit.Jen is really bending Sohn over a table a fucking him up that ass with his huge 7.5-inch Asian cock.
The judge's eyes must glaze over when the Bitchute/Adam Rakunas stuff comes up because it's so unrelated to the matter. It seems like a total admission that Sohn's not confident.
It's been so confusing to me too. Pat had a madeup address for the lolsuit. Like the address didn't exist.Good point. Jen wants to arrange quasis payment and it requires not just their payment history. He doesnt give a shit about what we think or want. Im sure there are a few people getting financial requests in order to resolve this since pat is refusing a court order to pay. Us laughing about it is just a byproduct of their frivolous failed lawsuit.
They are so worried about what a few rascals think. If everything is on the up and up then their books should show his $100 annual payment and thats pretty much it. If they were secretly funding a shifty $100k lawsuit that has pats financials tied to a contract. Then Jen will need to factor all that into his report and there might be some taxes owed to the IRS on someones end for that amount of money changing hands.
Either way Jen is there for just a small part of his case that he is building. Its not all aimed at the SFWA specifically. Pats publishers will need to provide what they pay pat also and so on. They are so caught up thinking its a personal attack when its just routine debtor collections from a legal stand point.
ThaT doesn’T maTTER, Judge liTTle one.Can they use the Josiah tapes of Rick admitting that "an organization that I am a member of" was helping him? Or even Starship Fonzie or whatever the fuck that guy's name is saying that the SFWA bankrolled it, though that might be hearsay.
This forum is dedicated exclusively to parody, comedy, and satirical content. None of the statements, opinions, or depictions shared on this platform should be considered or treated as factual information under any circumstances. All content is intended for entertainment purposes only and should be regarded as fictional, exaggerated, or purely the result of personal opinions and creative expression.
Please be aware that this forum may feature discussions and content related to taboo, controversial, or potentially offensive subjects. The purpose of this content is not to incite harm but to engage in satire and explore the boundaries of humor. If you are sensitive to such subjects or are easily offended, we kindly advise that you leave the forum.
Any similarities to real people, events, or situations are either coincidental or based on real-life inspirations but used within the context of fair use satire. By accepting this disclaimer, you acknowledge and understand that the content found within this forum is strictly meant for parody, satire, and entertainment. You agree not to hold the forum, its administrators, moderators, or users responsible for any content that may be perceived as offensive or inappropriate. You enter and participate in this forum at your own risk, with full awareness that everything on this platform is purely comedic, satirical, or opinion-based, and should never be taken as factual information.
If any information or discussion on this platform triggers distressing emotions or thoughts, please leave immediately and consider seeking assistance.
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (USA): Phone: 1-800-273-TALK (1-800-273-8255) Website: https://suicidepreventionlifeline.org/