• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

HOLY SCIENCE! OH MY NATURE!

Forum Clout
2,557
It makes no sense. Warnock is a religious Democrat from Georgia.

There’s also another religious Democrat from Georgia though who actually has a backbone.

View attachment 237012
Abortion approved by good ol' Jimmy if caused by rape or incest. Good for you, Jimmy. Those babies are not innocent and should certainly be destroyed.

Nice rationalizations, faggot.

Edit - To be clear: Jimmy being the rationalizing faggot, not sue.
 
Last edited:

T-t-t-Terry!

"I meant don't rib @T-t-t-Terry"
Forum Clout
37,250
It's bullshit because a thousand embryos just sitting in some inorganic container reeks of meddling with shit we shouldn't.
But they're human lives regardless of how they were formed. That's the crux of Pat's thought experiment - how do people who say life begins at conception reconcile saving the child over the embryos? It's retarded for the reason I pointed out; saving any of them is an act of virtue regardless of whether it was the most "rational" way to approach it.

Personally I'd grab the kid despite believing that all the embryos are human lives because a kid would be easier to save and I'm a pussy who doesn't want to burn to death.
 
Forum Clout
2,557
They may be innocent but on the other hand they’re retarded so they stink, its a tough one man :image_9248:

Then again if we aborted all rape babies we would have never gotten Michael Richards 2006 Laugh Factory
Forget Carter's bullshit rationalization, how about his pragmatism if his view were law? How does that work for rape?

And what's the rationale for incest? It was consensual incest (or it would be covered by "rape"), so why does that get a pass? Because of the possibility of genetic defect? No, because "genetic defect" wasn't an exception given by Carter.

Cater said what he said because he's at his core a politician spewing political buzzwords for his bullshit rationalization.
 
Top