• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

Gun Safety with Nana

Sue Lightning

<-- Never heard of Spankbang
Forum Clout
113,783
IMG_9394.jpeg
 
Forum Clout
4,149
And to harp on this last point because it is really important to Cumias entire psychology. You obviously can’t just shoot people for wronging you even in a “stand your ground” state.

We had a case here in Florida (notoriously pro gun and self defense) with this exact justification. A white dude was patrolling a gas station parking lot and noticed someone parked in a handicap spot without a tag. He confronts the woman and she apologizes. Her husband comes out, see’s the dude confronting his wife, and shoves him to the ground. After the shove he started walking back, and by that time the dude pulled his gun and shot him to death.

His argument was he didn’t know if the shove would turn into a fatal beatdown so he shot to protect himself. However, the prosecutors looked at a few things and came to a few conclusions.

Would he have approached the women if he never had the gun? No, and he even said this himself during the interrogation. Did the man plan to harm him further? No, in the security footage you can see him walking away before the gun even comes out. Was the force necessary? No. It does not matter if you THINK your life is endanger. The force was not equal. The black dude shoved him and walked away. For that he was shot and killed.

The guy was found guilty. Even in a “self defense” case where the guy was assaulted first and no less in a very gun friendly state. Now lets look at Anthony Cumia. If Cumia went down to the Black Israelites and called them a nigger, and they punched him in the face, and he shot them? He’d be going to jail for murder. The weapon he carries empowered him to put himself in that situation and he knows the consequences. Force not equal etc etc…or how about the Times Square Incident? After the prostitute slaps him, he shoots her. Same shit. He put himself in that situation only because he had a gun. Force isn’t equal.

So that literally makes Nanas shooting fantasies strictly confined to a mugging (which he’d never be a part of considering he doesn’t leave his home), or a home break in (which are statistically low anyway.)
Dumb ape parked in the handicap spot and was likely doing it forever, got called out for doing so and proceeded to violence. That guy should get the key to the city for taking care of the problem.
 

JoeBrotheChildSpitGuzzler

I Am Racist Man Leader of the Digital Ku Klux Klan
Forum Clout
46,965
No surprisingly not. Melissa (Melinda? Who gives a fuck) wrote it in her tell all blog. She wrote it as if it was endearing which leads me to believe its real. Nana probably thought, for the first time in his life, it made him look like a nut and decided not to tell it.
Well it's also the legal definition of Brandishing, and illegal, even stupid ant would be aware of that having had to take a gun safety course
 
Top