Dr Disrespect is a tranny simping weirdo

[Sue2]

Those twitch guys are all massive LGBT covid vaccine faggots, I don’t care what they say.

Sooo what about Doc himself who admitted it? Why are you all bending over backwards to defend this dude? I’m not even asking sarcastically. It’s weird.

There’s also a difference between saying a 17 year old is cute than telling a 11 year old to send naked photos. If you think I’m condoning either you’re being obtuse.

Yeah thats what I just said. But again you’re downplaying it. Doc didn’t call a 17 year old cute and he got cancelled. He was sexting her. And asking her to meet up at Twitchcon. That is fucking grooming. I’d rather not start making the libertarian ebephilia defense of “Dude she was 17, not 12! Not a pedophile!”

 

[NoBacon]

Sooo what about Doc himself who admitted it? Why are you all bending over backwards to defend this dude? I’m not even asking sarcastically. It’s weird.

Yeah thats what I just said. But again you’re downplaying it. Doc didn’t call a 17 year old cute and he got cancelled. He was sexting her. And asking her to meet up at Twitchcon. That is fucking grooming. I’d rather not start making the libertarian ebephilia defense of “Dude she was 17, not 12! Not a pedophile!”

He said he bordered on inappropriate with a minor. They said the other stuff but you’d have to be retarded to believe anything they say. They clearly hate the guy.

I’m not defending him. You’re being histrionic. Is there anyone here who tries to publicly humiliate pedophiles more than I do? I hate them.

 

[Sue2]

What exactly did he say? Surely you're not talking about his tweet last week, right? Because if that's your reference you're a histrionic retard.

Oh you mean the tweet he made where he admitted to sexting a minor? Yeah man, just disregard that. Thats just me being histrionic. Even if full text logs leaked you’d be bending over backwards to defend those. “YEAH OK HE WANTED TO MEET UP WITH HER BUT WHERE DID HE SAY HE WANTED TO MEET UP TO FUCK HER??”

If you have a quote from him where he admits to soliciting a minor for sex on purpose than I'll literally leave the forum.

FUCKING. LOL. LOLLLLLLL. So now the intent is what matters. Good fucking lord the goalpost moving to defend a PEDOPHILE. So if I start sexting a child, but (SOMEHOW) I don’t know i’m talking to a kid, that means i’m innocent? You are a retard.

 

[Boq the Lonely Faggot]

Oh you mean the tweet he made where he admitted to sexting a minor? Yeah man, just disregard that. Thats just me being histrionic. Even if full text logs leaked you’d be bending over backwards to defend those. “YEAH OK HE WANTED TO MEET UP WITH HER BUT WHERE DID HE SAY HE WANTED TO MEET UP TO FUCK HER??”

FUCKING. LOL. LOLLLLLLL. So now the intent is what matters. Good fucking lord the goalpost moving to defend a PEDOPHILE. So if I start sexting a child, but (SOMEHOW) I don’t know i’m talking to a kid, that means i’m innocent? You are a retard.

Do you have the tweet where he admits to "sexting a minor on purpose" or not?

On purpose would mean he knew the minor was a minor.
Yes, I would argue the intent there would matter.

Edit: wait a minute, how would it NOT MATTER if he didn't know the person he was texting was a minor?
I don't understand.

 

[Sue2]

He said he bordered on inappropriate with a minor. They said the other stuff but you’d have to be retarded to believe anything they say. They clearly hate the guy.

Why would I have to be retarded to believe it? This is just like when Pat says “You can’t trust what those cyberstlakers say.” So the source of the info is more important than the info itself? Why was every Twitch streamer not surprised by this info coming out? Why did every Twitch employee confirm this and NOT ONE proclaimed this was all fake to slander his name?

Doc made millions for Twitch in his hayday. Then he’s banned for 4 years out of the blue. A company who’s motivation is making money would do that, right? Drop their biggest cashcow over nothing?

I’m not defending him. You’re being histrionic. Is there anyone here who tries to publicly humiliate pedophiles more than I do? I hate them.

Then why are you defending one?

 

[Sue2]

Do you have the tweet where he admits to "sexting a minor on purpose" or not?

On purpose would mean he knew the minor was a minor.
Yes, I would argue the intent there would matter.

Once again I will quote BOQ

“Mohammad wasn’t a pedophile because Aisha lied about her age.”

Oh ok, so the prophet couldn’t tell the 9 year old wasn’t actually 16.

WHO THE FUCK STARTS SEXTING WOMEN AND THEY DONT EVEN KNOW THEIR AGE

 

[NoBacon]

Why would I have to be retarded to believe it? This is just like when Pat says “You can’t trust what those cyberstlakers say.” So the source of the info is more important than the info itself? Why was every Twitch streamer not surprised by this info coming out? Why did every Twitch employee confirm this and NOT ONE proclaimed this was all fake to slander his name?

Doc made millions for Twitch in his hayday. Then he’s banned for 4 years out of the blue. A company who’s motivation is making money would do that, right? Drop their biggest cashcow over nothing?

Then why are you defending one?

Why are people as mad as this about it? What’s bothering you so much Sue?

 

[Sue2]

If I was innocent of this and didn’t know her age I would be screaming that in the fucking streets. I would be screaming that my name is being slandered. I would be defending myself visciously.

 

[Sue2]

Why are people as mad as this about it? What’s bothering you so much Sue?

Because you’re defending a fucking pedo. Are you serious? How about we start defending Eric or Anthony? Am I being trolled right now? Please say sike.

Biden showered with his children and grabs babies genitals. I would never say YEAH YEAH YEAH BUT BUT BUT. He’s a fucking creepy pedophile. See how easy that was?

 

[Boq the Lonely Faggot]

Once again I will quote BOQ

“Mohammad wasn’t a pedophile because Aisha lied about her age.”

Oh ok, so the prophet couldn’t tell the 9 year old wasn’t actually 16.

WHO THE FUCK STARTS SEXTING WOMEN AND THEY DONT EVEN KNOW THEIR AGE

Sue, calm down. You're making a scene.

I'm genuinely curious how, from a legal or moral stand point, it wouldn't matter whether he knew it was a minor or not.

I'm not even disputing that he knew it was a minor. I was disputing the possible contents of his messages, which is a separate issue. I'm now completely lost with this new declaration you've made that it doesn't matter whether he knew the minor was a minor. You lost me.

 

[Turry Precision ™®©]

Because you’re defending a fucking pedo. Are you serious? How about we start defending Eric or Anthony? Am I being trolled right now? Please say sike.

Biden showered with his children and grabs babies genitals. I would never say YEAH YEAH YEAH BUT BUT BUT. He’s a fucking creepy pedophile. See how easy that was?

Nice "psych", stupit

 

[Sue2]

I give up. Hate to be a Pat blowhard, but I know i’m absolutely in the right here. You guys can keep making fools out of yourself and defending a pedo. The more time that goes on and the more unsavory details that get said will just make you guys looked even stupider.

Actually, what am I talking about? Doc admits he did this and thats not enough. MSM reports on this (opening themselves to liabilities if its not true) and thats not good enough. Twitch employees come out and thats not good enough. So what difference would it make if the actual chats leak or the girl comes out? That too wouldn’t be good enough. Because only the people I don’t like are pedos. When the people I do like are pedos, it’s a witchhunt.

 

[NoBacon]

I give up. Hate to be a Pat blowhard, but I know i’m absolutely in the right here. You guys can keep making fools out of yourself and defending a pedo. The more time that goes on and the more unsavory details that get said will just make you guys looked even stupider.

Actually, what am I talking about? Doc admits he did this and thats not enough. MSM reports on this (opening themselves to liabilities if its not true) and thats not good enough. Twitch employees come out and thats not good enough. So what difference would it make if the actual chats leak or the girl comes out? That too wouldn’t be good enough. Because only the people I don’t like are pedos. When the people I do like are pedos, it’s a witchhunt.

We don’t know what he did, so I don’t know how to treat him. What’s the source on him knowing it was a minor and trying to fuck her at twitch con?

 

[Boq the Lonely Faggot]

We don’t know what he did, so I don’t know how to treat him. What’s the source on him knowing it was a minor and trying to fuck her at twitch con?

No don't ask him that, he'll get mad.

 

[Turry Precision ™®©]

I give up. Hate to be a Pat blowhard, but I know i’m absolutely in the right here. You guys can keep making fools out of yourself and defending a pedo. The more time that goes on and the more unsavory details that get said will just make you guys looked even stupider.

Actually, what am I talking about? Doc admits he did this and thats not enough. MSM reports on this (opening themselves to liabilities if its not true) and thats not good enough. Twitch employees come out and thats not good enough. So what difference would it make if the actual chats leak or the girl comes out? That too wouldn’t be good enough. Because only the people I don’t like are pedos. When the people I do like are pedos, it’s a witchhunt.

@NoBacon is defending adultery so even if we set his libertarianism aside he's still denying the law. Also his tits are YUUUUGE

 

[Sue2]

We don’t know what he did, so I don’t know how to treat him. What’s the source on him knowing it was a minor and trying to fuck her at twitch con?

Ok I said i’d give up but…

“The following day, Rolling Stone published an investigative article, which supported Conners' initial tweet; that The Verge and Bloomberg had corroborated the account with sources, who confirmed the sexual nature of the tweets—and that Beahm had asked about the minor's plans for attending TwitchCon.

Rolling Stone added an additional, unsavory detail from its own sources: that Beahm continued sending graphic, sexually-charged content to the minor after learning their age.”

I know, I know…how can we believe what Rolling Stone said?! Because it is a business. It loves money. If this shit weren’t true they are opening themselves up to a world of shit with lawsuits and thus losing money. They also did not look at the source and say “Well guess its true!” they looked at the source and corroborated it with other sources who also said it’s true.

If this is a conspiracy to take Doc down, it is one that would be shooting themselves in the foot. And why take Doc down anyway? Because he says tranny on his streams or something? (I honestly have no idea. Never watched the guy but apparently he’s “””alt right””” or something???) If i could just invent accusations like this you think they would use it to take down a real enemy like DAFFY DRUMPF or something.

Edit, in my best Columbo voice: Oh and uhhh just one more thing…So Doc says he had “bordering on inappropriate” interactions with a minor. He said this himself. Why is it such a far jump to believe it went farther than what he admitted? He could admit he sexted a child, but couldn’t admit he knowingly did it? Yeah, that sounds right. The latter sounds more heinous. When being forced to admit something horrible you’re going to sugarcoat it to protect yourself.

 

[Boq the Lonely Faggot]

@NoBacon is defending adultery so even if we set his libertarianism aside he's still denying the law. Also his tits are YUUUUGE

Summary of this thread:


Last week I said Doc probably sexted a minor but I hadn't seen proof of it.
Today I saw texts with a tranny so I called him a weirdo.


According to Sue, this makes me worse than the Prophet Mohammed.

 

[NoBacon]

Let’s say for the sake of argument he was flirting with a 17 year old - REEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!

An 18 year old is selling her self on onlyfans? Naked gay men are parading in front of infants? Preteens are cutting their genitals off? YAAAAAASSSSSS QUEEEEEEEN

 

[Sue2]

Let’s say for the sake of argument he was flirting with a 17 year old - REEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!

An 18 year old is selling her self on onlyfans? Naked gay men are parading in front of infants? Preteens are cutting their genitals off? YAAAAAASSSSSS QUEEEEEEEN

Both are wrong. At least I think both are wrong. If you’re trying to paint some hypocrisy from the media, fair, but thats not what I’M saying.

 

[NoBacon]

Both are wrong. At least I think both are wrong. If you’re trying to paint some hypocrisy from the media, fair, but thats not what I’M saying.

Yeah both are wrong, but I don’t know how wrong doc is. Look, he’s not worth anything as a man in my eyes now but does he deserve total no second chance? That depends on what he did.

If Eric Hildeman said he was wrong about his horrible “inactive pedo” views then he would deserve another chance.