We don’t know what he did, so I don’t know how to treat him. What’s the source on him knowing it was a minor and trying to fuck her at twitch con?
Ok I said i’d give up but…
“The following day, Rolling Stone published an investigative article, which supported Conners' initial tweet; that The Verge and Bloomberg had corroborated the account with sources, who confirmed the sexual nature of the tweets—and that Beahm had asked about the minor's plans for attending TwitchCon.
Rolling Stone added an additional, unsavory detail from its own sources: that Beahm continued sending graphic, sexually-charged content to the minor after learning their age.”
I know, I know…how can we believe what Rolling Stone said?! Because it is a business. It loves money. If this shit weren’t true they are opening themselves up to a world of shit with lawsuits and thus losing money. They also did not look at the source and say “Well guess its true!” they looked at the source and corroborated it with other sources who also said it’s true.
If this is a conspiracy to take Doc down, it is one that would be shooting themselves in the foot. And why take Doc down anyway? Because he says tranny on his streams or something? (I honestly have no idea. Never watched the guy but apparently he’s “””alt right””” or something???) If i could just invent accusations like this you think they would use it to take down a real enemy like DAFFY DRUMPF or something.
Edit, in my best Columbo voice: Oh and uhhh just one more thing…So Doc says he had “bordering on inappropriate” interactions with a minor. He said this himself. Why is it such a far jump to believe it went farther than what he admitted? He could admit he sexted a child, but couldn’t admit he knowingly did it? Yeah, that sounds right. The latter sounds more heinous. When being forced to admit something horrible you’re going to sugarcoat it to protect yourself.
