Cumtown.org is afraid of Fat Jackie

[guest]

What if a Nazi was gay?

Hahahahaha hell yeah, dude.

 

[retard]

using kant's distinctions of normative vs hypothetical imperatives

faggot nerd

 

[guest]

god damn it ... fine consider me trolled.



Don't make universal statements. It detracts from whatever point you're trying to make. All i need is one counterexample to counter your point. you should rephrase this.


Yes, they can. If you want to quibble about disturbing the peace, then someone can just stab you in the neck to stop you. The reason I mentioned the police is because your language is sloppy and you equivicate on terms and move the goalposts. I addressed this with the police example. It's moving the goalposts because your counter was. "Yeah but like I mean a specific example where that doesn't apply". This misses the point. Stop using universals and you won't have this issue.


In what sense? Are you on a quiet train car? Then the ushers can kick you off. Are you in the NYC subway? The armed police can and have arrested people. Be more specific. Your argument is a tautology because its true by definition. You're moving the goalposts to be "in the examples where no one can make you be quiet, then no one can make you be quiet".


You're making a normative statement, using kant's distinctions of normative vs hypothetical imperatives, this needs more clarification on the goal. "but it is still best to not be a loud, obnoxious nigger." if what? It's better stated as something like "but it is still best to not be a loud, obnoxious nigger...if you want to not get punched in the face stabbed? If you want to not have white pussies quietly cope and seethe but then do nothing?"

The problem with your statements if you are jumping between categorical and hypothetical norms. make a case for the categorical norm then, but don't use partial hypothetical language. The categorical concept doesn't really make sense to me in reality, but at least make your case for it.


I didn't address that point because who cares? Are you arguing for a categorical imperative to be polite? Who gives a shit. If that was your point you made it really badly. I was addressing this aspect


Is your entire point then that the cumtown admins are saying "pweeesh don't mention our site or we'll call you impolite?" that's an even dumber argument than I thought you were making. I had given you more benefit of the doubt than I should have.


Define your terms and be more clear with your language.

 

[Dog Eater]

god damn it ... fine consider me trolled.



Don't make universal statements. It detracts from whatever point you're trying to make. All i need is one counterexample to counter your point. you should rephrase this.


Yes, they can. If you want to quibble about disturbing the peace, then someone can just stab you in the neck to stop you. The reason I mentioned the police is because your language is sloppy and you equivicate on terms and move the goalposts. I addressed this with the police example. It's moving the goalposts because your counter was. "Yeah but like I mean a specific example where that doesn't apply". This misses the point. Stop using universals and you won't have this issue.


In what sense? Are you on a quiet train car? Then the ushers can kick you off. Are you in the NYC subway? The armed police can and have arrested people. Be more specific. Your argument is a tautology because its true by definition. You're moving the goalposts to be "in the examples where no one can make you be quiet, then no one can make you be quiet".


You're making a normative statement, using kant's distinctions of normative vs hypothetical imperatives, this needs more clarification on the goal. "but it is still best to not be a loud, obnoxious nigger." if what? It's better stated as something like "but it is still best to not be a loud, obnoxious nigger...if you want to not get punched in the face stabbed? If you want to not have white pussies quietly cope and seethe but then do nothing?"

The problem with your statements if you are jumping between categorical and hypothetical norms. make a case for the categorical norm then, but don't use partial hypothetical language. The categorical concept doesn't really make sense to me in reality, but at least make your case for it.


I didn't address that point because who cares? Are you arguing for a categorical imperative to be polite? Who gives a shit. If that was your point you made it really badly. I was addressing this aspect


Is your entire point then that the cumtown admins are saying "pweeesh don't mention our site or we'll call you impolite?" that's an even dumber argument than I thought you were making. I had given you more benefit of the doubt than I should have.


Define your terms and be more clear with your language.

nikocadoavocadopenis.jpg

 

[guest]

nikocadoavocadopenis.jpg

imagine this picture except instead of langoliers its nicocados asshole. i havent seen the nico asshole posted in a while so I couldnt make it a reality for you

 

[fenrir]

Retard said


tiny minority of niggers whose behaviour is so egregious you get arrested for it.



Perhaps more then that.

I was going to compliment you for spelling "egregious" correctly, but you said "then" instead of "than" so fuck you!

 

[TorqueWheeler]

If you think a simple board feud is beneath you, this forum has definitely passed you by

These guys would not have survived the Board Wars of old.

 

[DMAN]

I am ready for the forum war

 

[TorqueWheeler]

I am ready for the forum war

Haven't heard this in years and years and it still hit me hard.

 

[TheGhostOfBernellTrammell]

A lot of good rules are completely unenforceable. Nobody can force you to be quiet and polite in public. It is your prerogative if you want to play music on your sail foam and talk above a necessary volume, but it is still best to not be a loud, obnoxious nigger.

who is this nigger

 

[LoomisBuckby]

faggot nerd

Read Kant, cunt

 

[retard]

Read Kant, cunt

I have read Kant. He was literally the worst faggot nerd imaginable. He only proposed to a single woman -- by letter -- after he met her once at a dinner. She rejected him. His tombstone should read "he never scored".

All the German idealists were pedophiles or complete losers, I completely reject the philosophy of anyone who lives a pathetic and meaningless life. Philosophy, particularly moral philosophy, is personally transformative. When you start to concede the legitimacy of a specific kind of thought, you begin to become more like the people that adhere to it.

The most important question that I ask in the evaluation of philosophers, poets, and statesmen is thus: did they lead a heroic life? If the answer is no, then they are useless and you should burn their works. Cattle die and kinsmen die.

 

[Faggot Boqposter]

god damn it ... fine consider me trolled.



Don't make universal statements. It detracts from whatever point you're trying to make. All i need is one counterexample to counter your point. you should rephrase this.


Yes, they can. If you want to quibble about disturbing the peace, then someone can just stab you in the neck to stop you. The reason I mentioned the police is because your language is sloppy and you equivicate on terms and move the goalposts. I addressed this with the police example. It's moving the goalposts because your counter was. "Yeah but like I mean a specific example where that doesn't apply". This misses the point. Stop using universals and you won't have this issue.


In what sense? Are you on a quiet train car? Then the ushers can kick you off. Are you in the NYC subway? The armed police can and have arrested people. Be more specific. Your argument is a tautology because its true by definition. You're moving the goalposts to be "in the examples where no one can make you be quiet, then no one can make you be quiet".


You're making a normative statement, using kant's distinctions of normative vs hypothetical imperatives, this needs more clarification on the goal. "but it is still best to not be a loud, obnoxious nigger." if what? It's better stated as something like "but it is still best to not be a loud, obnoxious nigger...if you want to not get punched in the face stabbed? If you want to not have white pussies quietly cope and seethe but then do nothing?"

The problem with your statements if you are jumping between categorical and hypothetical norms. make a case for the categorical norm then, but don't use partial hypothetical language. The categorical concept doesn't really make sense to me in reality, but at least make your case for it.


I didn't address that point because who cares? Are you arguing for a categorical imperative to be polite? Who gives a shit. If that was your point you made it really badly. I was addressing this aspect


Is your entire point then that the cumtown admins are saying "pweeesh don't mention our site or we'll call you impolite?" that's an even dumber argument than I thought you were making. I had given you more benefit of the doubt than I should have.


Define your terms and be more clear with your language.

Thank you for correcTing the record.

 

[CompoundBasement]

I have read Kant. He was literally the worst faggot nerd imaginable. He only proposed to a single woman -- by letter -- after he met her once at a dinner. She rejected him. His tombstone should read "he never scored".

All the German idealists were pedophiles or complete losers, I completely reject the philosophy of anyone who lives a pathetic and meaningless life. Philosophy, particularly moral philosophy, is personally transformative. When you start to concede the legitimacy of a specific kind of thought, you begin to become more like the people that adhere to it. There is a deep hazard here, because Kant was an autistic German worm. I refuse to cede legitimacy to any of these scatophilic German freaks. Hegel, Kant, Goethe -- these men turned Germany into a place of godless autistic degeneracy that was trivially manipulated by Jews.

The most important question that I ask in the evaluation of philosophers, poets, and statesmen is thus: did they lead a heroic life? If the answer is no, then they are useless and you should burn their works. Cattle die and kinsmen die.

"The most important question that I ask in the evaluation of philosophers, poets, and statesmen is thus: did they lead a heroic life?"

I want to easily see via "Early Life" if they're jews, and they usually are.

 

[guest]

god damn it ... fine consider me trolled.



Don't make universal statements. It detracts from whatever point you're trying to make. All i need is one counterexample to counter your point. you should rephrase this.


Yes, they can. If you want to quibble about disturbing the peace, then someone can just stab you in the neck to stop you. The reason I mentioned the police is because your language is sloppy and you equivicate on terms and move the goalposts. I addressed this with the police example. It's moving the goalposts because your counter was. "Yeah but like I mean a specific example where that doesn't apply". This misses the point. Stop using universals and you won't have this issue.


In what sense? Are you on a quiet train car? Then the ushers can kick you off. Are you in the NYC subway? The armed police can and have arrested people. Be more specific. Your argument is a tautology because its true by definition. You're moving the goalposts to be "in the examples where no one can make you be quiet, then no one can make you be quiet".


You're making a normative statement, using kant's distinctions of normative vs hypothetical imperatives, this needs more clarification on the goal. "but it is still best to not be a loud, obnoxious nigger." if what? It's better stated as something like "but it is still best to not be a loud, obnoxious nigger...if you want to not get punched in the face stabbed? If you want to not have white pussies quietly cope and seethe but then do nothing?"

The problem with your statements if you are jumping between categorical and hypothetical norms. make a case for the categorical norm then, but don't use partial hypothetical language. The categorical concept doesn't really make sense to me in reality, but at least make your case for it.


I didn't address that point because who cares? Are you arguing for a categorical imperative to be polite? Who gives a shit. If that was your point you made it really badly. I was addressing this aspect


Is your entire point then that the cumtown admins are saying "pweeesh don't mention our site or we'll call you impolite?" that's an even dumber argument than I thought you were making. I had given you more benefit of the doubt than I should have.


Define your terms and be more clear with your language.

Cmon V.

Where do I start?

How many things can you possibly have wrong? Especially after being part of the inside for so long . Are you feigning being so misinformed in the hopes you won’t get Dox’d?

Let’s not get ahead of ourselves.

Let’s go one issue at a time:

JEFF Ross, not Jack... A hack? Watch a friars roast dummy. He’s a master at what he does. Neither here nor there... ok. David Duke... ahhh! That old gag!! Context means nothing with you ladies, does it?

I was going to skip addressing your second paragraph altogether. Your lack of information and overt anger only makes you sound desperate to lambaste me. Do you actually think my priorities in life include becoming “famous”? Holy shit are you clueless. I’m a guitarist that plays a guitar for money. FINALLY. After many years of chasing the pipe dream (prior to having a family to support) I “CREATED MY OWN MUSIC MMMMAAAAAAAAAANNNNN!”

Creativity is awesome, but if you allow it to become your selfish obsession at the cost of your families security and happiness, YOU’RE ONLY BEING A DICK. A creative DICK, but a dick nonetheless. Therein lies your assholic hypocrisy. I’m not writing music and trying to sell my own, so I’m a “coattail rider”, but if I was only playing original music I wouldn’t be doing the right thing with my family, so I’d be the horrible Dad and Father that you dummies claim I am.

So- which is it?

I play cover music to pay the bills, in order to keep my family happy, healthy and well provided for, or I play original music in the elusive search for fame and fortune and REALLY be a shitty human being (not by the subs standards (which will paint me that way forever... that’s “the bit”.) but by MY OWN STANDARDS, The particulars of which you have no clue about.

You sound to me like a “never-was-wanna-be”. You might play a little , but never quite figured out how to make any real $$ doing it. Unfortunate. I see it all too often. That’s called ego getting in the way. Once you actually learn anything about the entertainment industry, no matter how big or small your business may be, you begin to understand that making money is the #1 priority. Write, record, produce and shop your creations all you want. The bigger question is: Do you want to do that in your spare time while you’re not making sandwiches at Panera bread? or would you rather be playing cover tunes to support the people you’re responsible for? (or, in your case, probably just yourself. You sound like someone who has nobody in his life. Very bitter. I can just tell) My choice was remaining a HVAC mechanic, or becoming a full time guitarist. I chose the latter. You’re trying to fault me for that? No one’s buying into your reasoning, or logic..more accurately, your lack of logic.

Your last paragraph... Wow. All I have for you is this:

Your transparent attempt at getting me to engage in a hostile way was a total failure. There is NOTHING this sub can do to ruffle my feathers anymore. If you’re who I’m pretty sure you are, I understand your embarrassment and shame. So shameful were your actions at Anthony’s that you’ve decided to divorce yourself from everyone there. I don’t blame you. What you did was reprehensible and selfish. Then you lied about it and it took your “friend” who came over with you to get you to confess. You’re a thief, liar, sore loser at poker and you always wanted to bang my GF. She was physically appalled by you and she politely told you to fuck off on more than one occasion. You’re a sloppy drunk that sucks at darts and needs to feel famous around Dec. 25. How’s the beard going?

Yeah. I know who you are.

 

[JumboYumYums]

god damn it ... fine consider me trolled.



Don't make universal statements. It detracts from whatever point you're trying to make. All i need is one counterexample to counter your point. you should rephrase this.


Yes, they can. If you want to quibble about disturbing the peace, then someone can just stab you in the neck to stop you. The reason I mentioned the police is because your language is sloppy and you equivicate on terms and move the goalposts. I addressed this with the police example. It's moving the goalposts because your counter was. "Yeah but like I mean a specific example where that doesn't apply". This misses the point. Stop using universals and you won't have this issue.


In what sense? Are you on a quiet train car? Then the ushers can kick you off. Are you in the NYC subway? The armed police can and have arrested people. Be more specific. Your argument is a tautology because its true by definition. You're moving the goalposts to be "in the examples where no one can make you be quiet, then no one can make you be quiet".


You're making a normative statement, using kant's distinctions of normative vs hypothetical imperatives, this needs more clarification on the goal. "but it is still best to not be a loud, obnoxious nigger." if what? It's better stated as something like "but it is still best to not be a loud, obnoxious nigger...if you want to not get punched in the face stabbed? If you want to not have white pussies quietly cope and seethe but then do nothing?"

The problem with your statements if you are jumping between categorical and hypothetical norms. make a case for the categorical norm then, but don't use partial hypothetical language. The categorical concept doesn't really make sense to me in reality, but at least make your case for it.


I didn't address that point because who cares? Are you arguing for a categorical imperative to be polite? Who gives a shit. If that was your point you made it really badly. I was addressing this aspect


Is your entire point then that the cumtown admins are saying "pweeesh don't mention our site or we'll call you impolite?" that's an even dumber argument than I thought you were making. I had given you more benefit of the doubt than I should have.


Define your terms and be more clear with your language.

 

[Chive Turkey]

Friendship ended with Kant.

Now Hume is my best friend.