He's fucked a lot of underage girls during his "music career."I like both this movie and Fight Club because he gets btfo'd in that one too. What a homo.
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
He's fucked a lot of underage girls during his "music career."I like both this movie and Fight Club because he gets btfo'd in that one too. What a homo.
I'm gobsmacked that someone from Hollywood would behave in such a manner.He's fucked a lot of underage girls during his "music career."
I'm gobsmacked that someone from Hollywood would behave in such a manner.
The real estate agent covers up his murders to make a sale because it would disrupt the flow of her life. Police do not inquire about a missing person only a private detective. The lawyer in the last scene tells Bateman he saw Paul Allen alive in London to give Bateman some evidence that he could not have murdered Paul Allen. They are all complicit in covering up the murders.Or he could've been imagining it all.
The opening of that scene is my favorite part of the movie.Well, we have to end apartheid for one. And slow down the nuclear arms race, stop terrorism and world hunger. We have to provide food and shelter for the homeless, and oppose racial discrimination and promote civil rights, while also promoting equal rights for women.
my ex says she had sex with him when he was touring conventions with his bandHe's fucked a lot of underage girls during his "music career."
Let me guess, Joker is your second favorite and and Falling Down is a close third (you haven't realised that you're not supposed to root for D-Fens)American Psycho is my favorite movie of all time,
Fun Fact: James Van der beek played Patrick's brother in Rules of Attraction.
I've read a few of Easton Ellis' books and they were all set in the same Universe and would make references to other characters/places in different books. Can't remember if Patrick mentions Camden College in the movie but I'm pretty sure he does in the book at least. Also, Robert Downey Jr's character in Less Than Zero is related to someone in Rules of Attraction (I think he was brothers with the gay guy).
EDIT: I think it's actually Andrew McCarthy's character, not Downey jr
Oh GOOD FOR YOUFun fact, Christian Bale based his character on Tom Cruise
Take that for what you will
The commentary is as good if not better than the art.My name is Patrick S. Tomlinson. I am 42 years old.
View attachment 11631
I live on 2611 N Oakland Ave, Milwaukee, WI in a half house next to a housing project.
I believe in not taking care of myself, with a unbalanced diet, in a rigorous Twitter routine. In the morning, if my face is a little puffy, I'll eat an entire Entemann's crumcake as I call people child on Twitter. I can do a thousand now.
![]()
After I finish calling people child, I then move on to calling people atalker. In the shower, I expel last night's four chilidogs into the shower drain and use my prediabetic foot to mash it down into the drain.
![]()
Then I apply the nigger pepperoni of the child I killed the night earlier onto my face as I prepare the rest of my routine.
There is an idea of a Patrick S. Tomlinson, some kind of fatbody, but there is no real me, only a Twitter account, something lazy, and though I can hide my cold gaze in endless selfies and you can shake my fat hand and feel flesh gripping you and maybe you can even sense our lifestyles are probably incomparable: I simply... am... fat.
![]()
I hate this movie. It's a sophomoric bleaching of a potentially intelligent, powerful idea. That idea is that the FORM of the narrative should convey the MEANING of the story. In its simplest iterations (Faulkner or Kafka) it deals with craziness and what has come to be called 'surreal'. More subtle exercises (Joyce, Nabokov) extend that to an emotional breadth and archetypal depth. But that results in hard work for the reader, so from time to time, lesser novelists recycle the idea at the high school level so that a larger and lazier readership can 'get' it.Interesting theory.
I can't say I'm a Brett Easton Ellis fan - his writing is a little too nihilistic and even fatalistic for my liking. But the work Gwin Turner did on adapting that story for film was exemplary; it turned a rather avant garde novel with chapter long tangents into a very watchable, and very distinct, film.
There's moments I remember questioning what's real and what isn't: the brief scene dragging Paul Allen's body where suddenly no blood is draining from the bag. The death of the women which would clearly have woken anyone nearby up. The discovery of the clean apartment. The crazy events one night after the ATM message. The co-worker telling Patrick he saw Paul Allen just recently, playing off the answering machine "confession" as a joke.
Now, one can view those things as a metaphor for yuppies being so conceited and selfish, that they would rather ignore and cover up such acts of others to keep their own noses clean, or for personal gain (like the realtor). Or you could even view the film in it's entirety as the progressive self destruction of an empty man, who slowly loses his mind. I take it differently myself: from the moment the movie starts, Patrick is completely gone. All the deaths are complete fantasies, an outlet for his rage issues and vapid existence of drugs and money. It's the simplest explanation for why, despite blatant and haphazard handling of killings that would've nailed anyone, he "gets away" with them. What you're actually seeing throughout the film is the facade of his personality, and the faux depth he has, being chipped away - i.e. the act falling apart. He has nothing to him and he knows it, but when the killer fantasies stop being enough, and he begins to see that they weren't ever real, his persona in real life fails, hinting that the fantasies might actually start becoming the reality.
It's why his secretary is such a focal point. She's the grounding rod, the one innocent that he tried to take advantage of but feels he can't. The potential victim he couldn't bring himself to kill, in a moment of rare, naked honesty where he practically begs her to leave - a moment where the fantasy was about to be the reality, but enough of his grasp on reality was still left to stop himself. She, in a way, was his last tether to humanity, and when she finds out just how crazy he is at the very end of the film, and breaks down crying, it represents that there was never a real Patrick, and he is now just an animal given to his fantastical impulses - further cemented by the final soliloquy of the film.
I haven't thought about American Psycho in a while, but that's what I think it represents: using the metaphor of shallow 80's capitalism to reflect a man's destructive psyche. Credit to Ellis, Bale, Turner, and the director of the film.
I'm not smart enough to sift through all this gobbledygook, but generally I agree that this movie is fun but also shallow and overrated. Christian Bale is a great creep, but his performance is just left hanging out there like a limp, unsucked dick while the director plays another Haircut 100 song so that she can be "ironic". "Remember the goofy 80's, y'all!"I hate this movie. It's a sophomoric bleaching of a potentially intelligent, powerful idea. That idea is that the FORM of the narrative should convey the MEANING of the story. In its simplest iterations (Faulkner or Kafka) it deals with craziness and what has come to be called 'surreal'. More subtle exercises (Joyce, Nabokov) extend that to an emotional breadth and archetypal depth. But that results in hard work for the reader, so from time to time, lesser novelists recycle the idea at the high school level so that a larger and lazier readership can 'get' it.
Films have a harder time with this problem, because they work with a more constrained imagination, and have a tighter integration with societal semiotics. Still, we have some intelligent work with the idea. Greenaway is my own favorite, who incidentally doesn't shy away from the edge of violence as is done here. (Why? To preserve the comic stance? If so, Turner and Harron are unwittingly like the society they think their poking fun at.).
A related problem is that Harron mistakes style in the costumes and actor's bearing for cinematic style. Really fucking shallow. This film is cleverness for dummies. The only intriguing element here is the probably unintended notion of Dafoe as an imagined Moriarty. This isn't taken anywhere, but Dafoe does have a haunting presence independent of this simple effort.
Has it really been 12 years since Paul Allen disappeared? I can’t believe I married Jean have a son am in the middle of a divorce the biggest deal of my life a custody fight and I’m out looking for sconces.I noticed that, while walking on auto pilot, I had found my way to the building where Pierce and Pierce still have their offices, the offices I haven’t been to since the “issue” made it better for all concerned if I went out on my own It’s about time The company will stake you It would be better if this were kept hush-hush.
This forum is dedicated exclusively to parody, comedy, and satirical content. None of the statements, opinions, or depictions shared on this platform should be considered or treated as factual information under any circumstances. All content is intended for entertainment purposes only and should be regarded as fictional, exaggerated, or purely the result of personal opinions and creative expression.
Please be aware that this forum may feature discussions and content related to taboo, controversial, or potentially offensive subjects. The purpose of this content is not to incite harm but to engage in satire and explore the boundaries of humor. If you are sensitive to such subjects or are easily offended, we kindly advise that you leave the forum.
Any similarities to real people, events, or situations are either coincidental or based on real-life inspirations but used within the context of fair use satire. By accepting this disclaimer, you acknowledge and understand that the content found within this forum is strictly meant for parody, satire, and entertainment. You agree not to hold the forum, its administrators, moderators, or users responsible for any content that may be perceived as offensive or inappropriate. You enter and participate in this forum at your own risk, with full awareness that everything on this platform is purely comedic, satirical, or opinion-based, and should never be taken as factual information.
If any information or discussion on this platform triggers distressing emotions or thoughts, please leave immediately and consider seeking assistance.
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (USA): Phone: 1-800-273-TALK (1-800-273-8255) Website: https://suicidepreventionlifeline.org/