• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

@admin can you PLEASE require approval of all posts by new users?

TheNanaDook

Forum Clout
5,268
Some faggot/tranny on Twitter replied to that jewy-looking journalist with the anglo last name and said which DDoS mitigation service @admin uses. How would someone figure this out? Is it based on what IP the domain resolves to, or is this information available in the whois lookup?
Yes, typical DDoS mitigation owns your DNS resolution so it can re-route or drop DNS requests/http connections if the source looks suspicious.
 

Chive Turkey

Erock Army Deserter
Forum Clout
32,437
I still don’t understand what it means. I use it for the most ribworthy posts but i think it was supposed to be used as a neutral reaction (fake/forced Nana laughter) and doesn’t actually increase your reaction score. Not that I really care.
I thought da whole thing was that Nana's hahaholeeshitting is fake and disingenuous laughter irl so I always used the reaction sarcastically.
 

Harry Powell

not a fan of comedy, I’m a fan of cruelty
Forum Clout
93,707
I still don’t understand what it means. I use it for the most ribworthy posts but i think it was supposed to be used as a neutral reaction (fake/forced Nana laughter) and doesn’t actually increase your reaction score. Not that I really care.
This is correct. Haha Holyshit is meant to designate fake laughter when someone tries too hard / a bit sucks. But no one uses it correctly.
 
G

guest

Guest
Some faggot/tranny on Twitter replied to that jewy-looking journalist with the anglo last name and said which DDoS mitigation service @admin uses. How would someone figure this out? Is it based on what IP the domain resolves to, or is this information available in the whois lookup?
Screenshot_2022-09-09-23-26-53-120_com.brave.browser.jpg
 

TheNanaDook

Forum Clout
5,268
That's just the certificate. That could be issued by any trusted CA. I didn't even know Cloudflare was a trusted CA. Usually it's Verisign or Digicert, or Let's Encrypt for people who don't want to pay.

The faggot on Twitter said it was some Russian CDN, not Cloudflare.
Amazon (AWS) does CA as well. Every cloud provider and/or DDoS host will eventually be a CA. Another way you can check is http response headers, they can give you a DDoS protection "signature", so to speak. Believe me, the trannoids know this stuff.
 

Gay Faggot.

When the frying pan hits just right.
Forum Clout
78,186
We need:

Car crash : -2
HHHS: 0
Ribs: +1
Something New: +2
It should be:

car crash: -1 not sure why it would be -2.
Worm Norton: is added as 0. It’s a tough one, man.
HHHS:+1 Since AntH would only haha holllliieeee shit at mildly amusing jokes. Something deserving of a slight guffaw.
Ribs:+2 The thing that keeps Nana fed, that’s made from Rick.
 

BudDickman

Forum Clout
41,881
Amazon (AWS) does CA as well. Every cloud provider and/or DDoS host will eventually be a CA. Another way you can check is http response headers, they can give you a DDoS protection "signature", so to speak. Believe me, the trannoids know this stuff.
I guess hiding the fact that a website has a particular CDN in front of it doesn't seem necessary if everything is secure and resilient to attacks by design. But the tranny attack of committing slander against a community with the help of faggots in the media and applying pressure to their CDN until they're dropped as a customer is not one that has been accounted for.
 

TheNanaDook

Forum Clout
5,268
I guess hiding the fact that a website has a particular CDN in front of it doesn't seem necessary if everything is secure and resilient to attacks by design. But the tranny attack of committing slander against a community with the help of faggots in the media and applying pressure to their CDN until they're dropped as a customer is not one that has been accounted for.
That's the hardest part of most of this. You can't really hide your DDoS protection, since they have to be front-and-center of your infrastructure stack in order to protect it. The tranny demon army is strong and autistic, it makes them a formidable foe. I've been trying to think of ways to help.
 

TheNanaDook

Forum Clout
5,268
That not just DDOS you can't hide whatever responds to requests from the internet...or....you couldn't make responses. Same with DNS. Onion domains try to get around that.

The domain returns an ip and then you do a whois on the ip and they are registered to cloudflare. Thats in addition to the cert. That's just becuase you can use cloudflares cert for free but you could upload your own if you pay for it. Or use cert bot, which is free, but requires automation.


The "hiding" aspect is just what is know as a reverse proxy. A proxy is anything that forwards along requests. So a forward (or normal) proxy is essentially what a vpn does.

forward proxy

your computer --> forward proxy ---> internet

so a reverse proxy is

your computer ---> internet ---> reverse proxy --> backend services


Cloudflare forwards the requests on to the back end server. Load balancers also do this. You can use ha proxy, nginx etc. as reverse proxies. Same with any SaaS load balancer like AWS ELBs.

Anything that acts as a reverse proxy can do that. It's not exclusive to ddos or anything cloudflare does. Cloudflare just had a very good buisness model and filled a the SMB (small and medium businesses) section of a market that was almost exclusively enterprise 100k contracts. Things like akamai. Cloudfront with AWS tried this but it was tied to aws, lacking features and several other reasons.

These are twitter retards who have no idea how anything works on the internet they live on.
Yep. Any front-door to your site that's on the public internet, is ... on the public internet. I've used Cloudflare, Cloudfront, and Akamai CDN. That's what sucks here. Anyway - DM any time you want to bounce around ideas.
 

Salted Earth Truffle

Eric Hildeman poked my no-no hole when I was 5
Forum Clout
40,712
That not just DDOS you can't hide whatever responds to requests from the internet...or....you couldn't make responses. Same with DNS. Onion domains try to get around that.

The domain returns an ip and then you do a whois on the ip and they are registered to cloudflare. Thats in addition to the cert. That's just becuase you can use cloudflares cert for free but you could upload your own if you pay for it. Or use cert bot, which is free, but requires automation.


The "hiding" aspect is just what is know as a reverse proxy. A proxy is anything that forwards along requests. So a forward (or normal) proxy is essentially what a vpn does.

forward proxy

your computer --> forward proxy ---> internet

so a reverse proxy is

your computer ---> internet ---> reverse proxy --> backend services


Cloudflare forwards the requests on to the back end server. Load balancers also do this. You can use ha proxy, nginx etc. as reverse proxies. Same with any SaaS load balancer like AWS ELBs.

Anything that acts as a reverse proxy can do that. It's not exclusive to ddos or anything cloudflare does. Cloudflare just had a very good buisness model and filled a the SMB (small and medium businesses) section of a market that was almost exclusively enterprise 100k contracts. Things like akamai. Cloudfront with AWS tried this but it was tied to aws, lacking features and several other reasons.

These are twitter retards who have no idea how anything works on the internet they live on.
Wow you curryskins really do know your tech stuff.
 

FurBurger

What would you do for a Klondike bar?
Forum Clout
22,495
I still don’t understand what it means. I use it for the most ribworthy posts but i think it was supposed to be used as a neutral reaction (fake/forced Nana laughter) and doesn’t actually increase your reaction score. Not that I really care.
I thought it was for the most ribworthy; I use it for the stuff that genuinely makes me laugh out loud.

t's not (just) about pushing kiwifarms and other message boards (that have alternating viewpoints to the mainstream) offline. You can say about Ponald Flump what you want, but he forced the DS's hand and they're trying to cram their agenda through at an accelerated speed, almost all at once.
The Don wanted to remove Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which would mean Facebook, Reddit, here etc. could be sued for defamatory user posts. Right now, they're considered a "carrier", and not responsible for offensive speech - although they still like to ban shit they don't like. All the privilege, none of the responsibility. The only way ending Section 230 will allow such companies to continue operating is if Reddit etc. have your Government name and details, so they can push any damages for libel on to you.

Fat Pat also wants an end to section 230; although he is stupid, and forgets this would mean that when he calls someone a "Nazi atalker" online he could be sued, as he's insulting a real person. If he does that to a German for example (and he has in the past) then that's a no-shit crime. The US has a rule where they won't extradite someone for speech protected by the 1st Amendment, but he'll need to be real fucking careful about leaving the US and setting foot in a country with an extradition agreement.

the cold war will move to the internet and it will be compartmentalized.
Already happened. When the West started kicking up a fuss about Huawei running their 5g networks, the Chinese just reconsidered what a "communication network" is, and pivoted to culture, and started buying control of sites. The largest shareholder in Reddit is "Tencent", which is China's Facebook. They are fully on board with the CCP's agenda, and as such China's happy to ban Facebook from the whole country and stick with Tencent. That's why they were so active in banning pro-Trump content on Reddit in the last election - Trump hated China, and was a bad pick for president from their perspective.

You might also know Tencent as the owners of Epic Games. Have you seen all those Epic Games giveaways? That's Tencent buying market share. They want that, because if they're big enough they'll get to dictate what stories games can tell. They've already banned pro-Taiwanese games from their shop; and the idea is if they can get to (say) a third of Steam's size, they'll be able to ban games with anti-China sentiments - after all, why make a game with the odd anti-Chinese joke in it if it'll be banned from their store and cost you 30% of your sales? I'm assuming they'll ban anti-Chinese sentiment in chat, too.

Tencent's also a film maker; you're going to see their imprint on a lot more films (they did "The Meg" recently, for example) and they'll make sure not to invest in anything critical of China or the CCP.

All those cheap, subsidised Chinese phones, tablets, routers, heaters, kettles, heaters, vacuum cleaners, anything with "TUYA" in the name, etc. will come into play, too. If it all kicks off, expect those things to start DDOSing military targets using your internet connection with a quickness.
 
G

guest

Guest
As most of you know, 1.7 recently sent himself a death threat:

View attachment 64184

The reason he did this was that Cloudflare's justification for removing Kiwifarms was a screenshot of an "immediate threat to human life" (which was removed by KF mods and the user banned within 13 minutes):

View attachment 64186

Thus, Patrick is sending violent threats to himself and tweeting at Cloudflare hoping that they will do the same thing to us. When Cloudflare inevitably does nothing in response to 1.7's oinking, he will once again come onto the forums and post violent threats to himself, screenshot them, and tweet them to Cloudflare. It does not matter how quickly they are removed because he will screenshot them immediately after posting them. He tried this last year during his failed lolsuit using the name "StealthyPussy" - creating the account, making 7 violent posts within 15 minutes, and never returning. All 7 appeared in his subsequent court filing.

View attachment 64187 View attachment 64189

Patrick undoubtedly has stealth accounts here and will shamelessly try this again if he doesn't get his way with his recent pathetic false flag attempt. He can easily be prevented from doing so by either disabling posting by new members, or requiring new posts to be approved.

What do yall think?
Isn’t it interesting that every time someone threatens him, they call him a faggot and throw in something about pedophiles. Like… every time.

Patrick is so unimaginative. And fixated. He thinks we’re fixated, we’re just making fun of a fat pig while taking a dump.

I’ll be coaching soccer this weekend for both of my kids, sparring with an old friend I haven’t seen in a long time who just won a big fight over in Europe, and lifting with my wife and making family dinner Sunday night with two neighbor families while all the neighborhood kids play in the big back yard.

This is what the fat pig doesn’t understand. Happy people don’t violently threaten other people. They don’t. They don’t need to pretend to be tough guys, they don’t need to pretend to be important, and they sure as fuck don’t threaten and SWAT people.

It’s the same thing with hate crimes. They just don’t happen often enough so people have to invent them.

It’s pretty clear that at least some of these are fake, some of the stuff he’s doing to himself, and he’ll try it again. In this environment, I think locking out new posts from new users is a great idea. I am a relatively new one, and if I have to go, so be it. I don’t want to see you guys lose this forum.

And it’s not just new posts, technically someone can come in and violently threaten him just in a reply. Maybe purging inactive accounts is a good idea also.

You know he probably has several and doesn’t use them very much.
 
Top