• Recently, onaforums has taken to opening a substack. You can subscribe to this substack to get email notifications when the site is down, gets a new domain name, or is otherwise running into trouble. We are not accepting donations at this time, so please skip the part where it asks if you would like to contribute. Subscribe at onaforums.substack.com

  • Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators. If you want your account deleted, or have other on-site inquiries, send a private message to @BlackTransLivesMatter or @BlackQueerLivesMatter.

    Do not post IRL pranks here without including the source

    For DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

Wwaw nuclear fusion

FranksWirecutters

Glow nigger. Got any of those IPs for me?
Forum Clout
35,771
Whoever here writes for Cosmos just doxxed themselves.

1000009113.jpg
 

quasi101

the $83,736.99 fugitive
Forum Clout
83,227
Every five years they come out and say there is a breakthrough and it ends up being nothing new.
its almost like mainstream science reporting is no different from any other news media that creates misleading sensationalized titles to drive traffic?

does the headline "cancer treatments slowly increase survival rates by a few percentage points each decade" generate any traffic vs "has the cure for cancer finally been solved" and its some shit in a lab that is promising but in early stages so it will take 10-20 years of grants and research to see any practical implementation. But 99.9% of the time promising leads end up no where.

WHYCOME THE NON SCIENTIFIC NEWS SOURCE THAT GENERATES REVENUE BASED ON OUTRAGEOUS CLAIMS ISN'T ACCURATELY REPORTING ON REALISTIC BORING INCREMENTAL IMPROVEMENTS THAT TAKE A GENERATION TO MATERIALIZE??!!!!
 

Racist Google Intern

Please watch the Itchy and Scratchy Friends Hour!
Forum Clout
28,722
its almost like mainstream science reporting is no different from any other news media that creates misleading sensationalized titles to drive traffic?

does the headline "cancer treatments slowly increase survival rates by a few percentage points each decade" generate any traffic vs "has the cure for cancer finally been solved" and its some shit in a lab that is promising but in early stages so it will take 10-20 years of grants and research to see any practical implementation. But 99.9% of the time promising leads end up no where.

WHYCOME THE NON SCIENTIFIC NEWS SOURCE THAT GENERATES REVENUE BASED ON OUTRAGEOUS CLAIMS ISN'T ACCURATELY REPORTING ON REALISTIC BORING INCREMENTAL IMPROVEMENTS THAT TAKE A GENERATION TO MATERIALIZE??!!!!
That was a long post when you could've just called me a retard, who's smart now einstien?
 

Riccardo Bosi

has janny powers
Forum Clout
72,898
Top