WWAW gooks stabbing robbers to death?

G

guest

Guest
PatrickIsAFag said:
Probably not after the Reddit obsessed Chink posted this:

[URL='https://ibb.co/FKGJqmC']
0-F7-CD66-B-BF68-4056-B79-D-DEE7-B9610865.jpg
[/URL]

He probably screwed his defense by stating this. This guy is a dummy.
Click to expand...
What are you talking about? How is stating that knowing your actions were "In the right" a bad thing for your defense?
 
NortheastPhilly

NortheastPhilly

Shock Jock
‎
‎
PatrickIsAFag said:
Probably not after the Reddit obsessed Chink posted this:



He probably screwed his defense by stating this. This guy is a dummy as the police could charge him at any time if they feel like it. They likely won’t but it’s fucking stupid to talk about shit publicly hours after it happens.
Click to expand...
Yeah, usually its helps to be able to state “I feared for my life”
 
G

guest

Guest
PatrickIsAFag said:
Castle Doctrine. If legally charged he would have to prove that he feared for his life. He admitted to having no fear.
Click to expand...
Not true...This happened in Las Vegas.

[URL unfurl="true"]https://thedefenders.net/blogs/castle-doctrine-and-nevada/[/URL]

Killing someone in Nevada is justifiable only if it is reasonably necessary to repel an imminent threat of death or substantial bodily harm. As a stand your ground state, Nevada requires no duty to retreat before killing in self-defense as long as the person fighting back:

  1. is not the original aggressor,
  2. has a right to be in the place where deadly force is used, and
  3. is not engaging in criminal activity.
In general, Nevada’s “Castle Doctrine” permits people in their homes or vehicles to fatally wound intruders even if the intruders had no violent intent.


*I couldn't find anything pertaining to being in a place of business , so perhaps castle doctrine doesn't even apply?
 
Say “Cookie”

Say “Cookie”

ShutYourCakehorn/gassers Alt
‎
‎
Bubbler said:
Not true...This happened in Las Vegas.

thedefenders.net

Castle Doctrine and Nevada | The Defenders Criminal Defense Attorneys

We take a look at NRS 193.240 and the "Castle Doctrine" in the state of Nevada. If you need a criminal defense attorney, call us!
thedefenders.net thedefenders.net

Killing someone in Nevada is justifiable only if it is reasonably necessary to repel an imminent threat of death or substantial bodily harm. As a stand your ground state, Nevada requires no duty to retreat before killing in self-defense as long as the person fighting back:

  1. is not the original aggressor,
  2. has a right to be in the place where deadly force is used, and
  3. is not engaging in criminal activity.
In general, Nevada’s “Castle Doctrine” permits people in their homes or vehicles to fatally wound intruders even if the intruders had no violent intent.


*I couldn't find anything pertaining to being in a place of business , so perhaps castle doctrine doesn't even apply?
Click to expand...


From what I understood when I lived in Las Vegas was that the “stand your ground” law applies wherever, you just have to show evidence that you feared for your life. He has the proof on video of the guy coming over the counter and not knowing if he was armed, he just should not have mentioned having no fear in the moment on a platform full of faggots who archive everything.
 
Last edited:
satanssockpuppet

satanssockpuppet

‎
‎
I wholeheartedly support this. Sometimes swift, blinding, retaliatory violence is absolutely called for. The wigger faggot wanted to play ghetto hard-guy gangster, and he paid the price for it. A few dozen more slaughtered wiggers might go a long way toward nudging white American youth away from black culture, something that we sorely, sorely need right now.
 
Patrick O'Neal

Patrick O'Neal

‎
‎
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top